Skip to comments.
Diabetes Breakthrough(scientists cure disease in mice)
National Post ^
| Tom Blackwell,
Posted on 12/15/2006 8:44:37 AM PST by kellynla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-203 next last
To: kellynla
Well, I certainly hope this is true. But hold onto your grains of salt. Canadian research is right up there with Korean and Mexican.
To: austinmark; FreedomCalls; IslandJeff; JRochelle; MarMema; Txsleuth; Newtoidaho; texas booster; ...
Type I Diabetes Ping ListFR mail me to add yourself! (Type IIs welcome, too.)
62
posted on
12/15/2006 9:35:43 AM PST
by
IslandJeff
(FR mail me to be added to the Type I Diabetes ping list)
To: r9etb
My son has type 1 and it is very difficult, if not impossible to maintain HC1A levels which a normal person would have. Maintaining proper blood sugar is vital is reducing the possible ill affects of diabetes, but I think most doctors would say you can reduce the chances in type 1 diabetics, but never to the level of a non diabetic.
63
posted on
12/15/2006 9:38:23 AM PST
by
milwguy
To: rednesss
That was my immediate thought. How are the Pharma.. co.s going to get by without my over $250.00 monthly I spend for Insulin? Second thought was will they actually allow it to happen?
64
posted on
12/15/2006 9:38:32 AM PST
by
rock58seg
(NO McCAIN, NO STAIN, NO PAIN, ONLY GAIN)
To: Minn
I am a Type I. I am 42, and have been diabetic since 1980. I have a little stomach neuropathy, but after 26 years my feet, kidneys and eyes are fine. Good control
can delay complications well into the later stages of life. There is still some random variation (some people with poor control get few complications, some with great control get them early), but control is a big factor. Despite my diabetes, I have had a largely normal life and am a happily married father. Good control and regular contact with a good internist who knows about Type I are extremely important. (Have I mentioned good control yet? :))
The research is interesting, but this kind of "very exciting, five years away from a cure" thing has been around since I first got sick.
Ironically, insulin itself was first isolated in Toronto.
To: kellynla
This will never work for pharmaceutical companies since they can't patent it.
To: kellynla
67
posted on
12/15/2006 9:45:07 AM PST
by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: Aggie Mama
They could pretend they're software IP vultures and patent the idea of curing someone's diabetes by giving them a treatment that would cause the diabetes to go away. Hey, maybe I'll patent that right there.
68
posted on
12/15/2006 9:48:24 AM PST
by
MichiganConservative
(The US is so full of domestic enemies, maybe all we can do is slow the inevitable ascent of tyranny.)
To: kellynla
69
posted on
12/15/2006 10:03:15 AM PST
by
altura
To: Romish_Papist
Any treatment that may emerge to help at least some patients would likely be years away from hitting the market." That last sentence is just plain unsat.
This ain't AIDs, so there will be no push.
70
posted on
12/15/2006 10:06:58 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
To: FastCoyote
I note idly that it took WAY too many posts for this one to come up. Whatsa matta you peoples?
71
posted on
12/15/2006 10:09:32 AM PST
by
thulldud
("Para inglés, oprima el dos.")
To: kellynla
Michael J. Fox will be upset that the cure didn't involve putting fetuses into a meat grinder and feeding them to the mice.
To: kellynla
If the Canadians have actually cured diabetes, then Hillary will quote it as proof socialized medicine works.
73
posted on
12/15/2006 10:16:31 AM PST
by
T.Smith
To: r9etb
Ho. Lee. Crap. I hope and pray that this works for my kid. Ditto.
74
posted on
12/15/2006 10:29:17 AM PST
by
toast
To: rednesss
"...thought the only promising thing out there was Byetta..."
Have you tried Byetta? How does it work?
75
posted on
12/15/2006 10:38:15 AM PST
by
Monterrosa-24
(...even more American than a Russian AK-47 and a French bikini.)
To: Gay State Conservative
This will make a major dent in Wilford Brimley's income. No more diabetes commercials for him. Now what are those mail order drug companies going to push to seniors in those annoying commercials?
76
posted on
12/15/2006 10:40:06 AM PST
by
Comstock1
(If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry point 45 caliber miracle.)
To: IslandJeff
Thanks for the ping...this is amazing..and I will look forward to seeing what happens with human tests.
77
posted on
12/15/2006 10:40:25 AM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Bolton/Cheney (that would be Lynne) 08)
To: kellynla
PLEASE, GOD, LET THIS ONE BE FOR REAL!........
78
posted on
12/15/2006 10:43:37 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
To: Comstock1
>>>...mail order drug companies going to push to seniors in those annoying commercials?
Incontinence products.
79
posted on
12/15/2006 10:44:41 AM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
To: milwguy
The CBC story you linked suggests that the treatment would only prevent susceptible people from getting type I, and maybe cure people who have only had it for a little while (i.e., islet cells are damaged but not destroyed yet). No use for people like me: ten years since diagnosis, islet cells long dead. Still, I wouldn't have to worry as much about my boys getting it.
80
posted on
12/15/2006 10:47:24 AM PST
by
kalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson