Has Iran's dictator Mahmoud Ahmedinejad put himself beyond the pale by associating with the KKK's David Duke? We'll see.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
To: All
2 posted on
12/14/2006 12:28:11 AM PST by
Cindy
To: goldstategop
You know in a way this is funny.
Iran and it's little runt of a dictator pull all of this crap, the calling for the destruction of Israel, the United States, the anti-Semitic screeds, the insane drive for nuclear weapons, etc., etc., but the presence of David Duke at a Holocaust Denier's Convention in Tehran is supposed to be the straw that broke the camel's back.
There is a simple and effective answer to Iran's troublemaking, and it involves nothing more complicated than pulling a B53 warhead (yield = 9 megatons) out of our inventory and dropping it on Tabriz, and then sending a message to the little bearded wonder asking him if he'd like to keep Tehran intact while pursuing a new hydroelectric power program, as his nuke program will be on the way out.
4 posted on
12/14/2006 1:03:07 AM PST by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: goldstategop
David Duke, I didn't know that he was that important. How many followers does he have?
6 posted on
12/14/2006 1:16:20 AM PST by
garylmoore
(Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
To: goldstategop
That's one heck of a circle-jerk he's got going on over there. I'd call it a "target of opportunity".
So... any way we can convince them to take Duke hostage?
9 posted on
12/14/2006 1:32:43 AM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: goldstategop
Well, let have Chris Matthews weigh in on the subject. . .
Farrah pops the Libs here; a good one. . .
10 posted on
12/14/2006 1:37:23 AM PST by
cricket
(Save a Terrorist - join the Democrats/Live Liberal Free; or suffer their consequences)
To: goldstategop
"Has Mahmound Ahmedinejad gone too far?"
Nah. Sheets Byrd doesn't seem to have been invited to the shindig.
11 posted on
12/14/2006 1:37:37 AM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(Only liberals and RINOS can escape full speed through crevices that would challenge a cockroach.)
To: goldstategop
The fact is that this nonsense, including the nuclear issue with Iran has been going on for over a decade, especially ever since the end of Iran-Iraq War in late 80's! Who stood up to the Mullahs? No one! Who tried to prevent Hezbollah in Lebanon to be established as early as approx. 1982 by Khomeini? No one! Ahmadi Nejad isn't a new player; has been around for nearly 28 years now including his direct involvement in the U.S. Embassy hostage taking. KKK is just the latest on the smorgasbord. Who will stand up to this and DO something about it rather than utter some rhetoric? Mullahs have Russia, China and most of EU on their side. When and why should these players care, let alone do something, about KKK, human rights, student or otherwise protests in Iran, when they each have multimillion dollar business deals with the Mullahs & their cohorts? What is the incentive to not support the Mullahs?
Ahmadi Nejad does what he does because he can. It is that simple.
The real questions should be why he and the Mullahs are given the latitude to do what they do and have for nearly 28 years? Why haven't they been stopped? And, what is the strategy now, if any, to stop them before it is too late?
12 posted on
12/14/2006 1:38:36 AM PST by
odds
To: goldstategop
As long as he keeps slamming Bush and threatening Isreal I think the left will stick with him.
13 posted on
12/14/2006 1:49:20 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Ego chatters endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
To: goldstategop
The history of the Ku Klux Klan was 100% democrat except for a few rabid nut cases of late.
19 posted on
12/14/2006 3:26:22 AM PST by
tkathy
(Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
To: goldstategop
As Mike Wallace stipulated after his interview with Ahmedinejad "He doesn't dispute that the Holocaust never happened just the number of the claimed dead and tortured, so what's the big deal?".
-!
20 posted on
12/14/2006 5:14:29 AM PST by
poobear
(Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
21 posted on
12/14/2006 5:56:12 AM PST by
SJackson
(had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
To: goldstategop
The fact that Adminanutjob and David Duke are together comes as no surprise to any rational thinking person. What they both have in common is a pathological hatred of anything Jewish and American and so they are both birds of a feather.
Also remember 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' applies here.
To: goldstategop
What his hilarious is not that Ahmedinejad finally went over the edge by associating with Duke, but that Duke has reached a new level by associating with Ahmedinejad.
David Duke is a wacko fraud and a joke. Ahmedinejad is the dangerous one.
24 posted on
12/14/2006 6:40:07 AM PST by
AmishDude
(I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson