Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raids in 6 states may be largest ever (ICE & Homeland Security make 'SWIFT" move.. 1,282 arrests)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 12/13/06 | Jennifer Tanhelm - ap

Posted on 12/13/2006 11:32:02 AM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - More than 1,200 people were arrested in meatpacking plants in six states during raids that federal officials said amounted to the largest-ever workplace crackdown on illegal immigration.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Wednesday the investigation uncovered a "disturbing front" in the war against illegal immigration, in which illegal immigrants are using the identities of U.S. citizens to obtain jobs.

"Violations of our immigration laws and privacy rights often go hand in hand," he said. "Enforcement actions like this one protect the privacy rights of innocent Americans while striking a blow against illegal immigration."

The raids at Swift & Co. plants across the country resulted in 1,282 arrests, including 1,217 on immigration charges and 65 on criminal charges such as identity theft. Chertoff said the investigation is continuing into several groups that may have sold identity documents to illegal immigrants.

The arrested workers were from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Peru, Laos, Sudan, Ethiopia and other countries.

During a raid Tuesday at the Swift plant in Greeley, Colo., a frustrated Tony Garcia watched as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents swarmed inside to arrest illegal immigrants. "We need help, we need answers," he said, questioning who would take care of the children whose parents were arrested.

The raids followed a 10-month investigation into illegal immigrants suspected of buying or stealing other people's identities to secure U.S. jobs. The scheme may have had hundreds victims, officials said.

Immigration officials last month informed Swift that it would remove unauthorized workers on Dec. 4, but Swift asked a federal judge to prevent agents from conducting the raid, arguing it would cause "substantial and irreparable injury" to its business.

The company estimated a raid would remove up to 40 percent of its 13,000 workers. Greeley-based Swift describes itself as the world's second-largest meat processor with sales of about $9 billion.

After a closed hearing, a judge on Thursday rejected Swift's request, clearing the way for Tuesday's raids at the plants in Greeley; Grand Island; Cactus, Texas; Hyrum, Utah; Marshalltown, Iowa; and Worthington, Minn.

The six plants represent all of Swift's domestic beef processing capacity and 77 percent of its pork processing capacity.

Advocates of stricter immigration control praised the raids and pointed out that they targeted people suspected of committing other crimes in addition to being in the U.S. illegally.

"I'm glad that ICE is enforcing our immigration laws in light of the illegal immigration crisis we face across the country," Sen. Wayne Allard (news, bio, voting record), R-Colo., said in a statement.

Others called the raids heavy-handed and criticized the effect on families.

"They are taking mothers and fathers, and we're really concerned about the children," said the Rev. Clarence Sandoval of St. Thomas Aquinas Roman Catholic Church in Logan, Utah. "I'm getting calls from mothers saying they don't know where their husband was taken."

United Food and Commercial International Workers union spokeswoman Jill Cashen told the Post workers taken from the Worthington, Minn., plant were bused to South Dakota.

She said Tuesday that attorneys for the union would ask federal judges in all six states for injunctions to halt the raids.

Mexico's Foreign Relations Department also pledged to ensure that any Mexicans caught up in the raids have "their human rights fully respected, and are given all the necessary assistance, orientation and consular protection."

No charges were filed against Swift.

In a written statement, President and CEO Sam Rovit said the company has never knowingly hired illegal workers and does not condone the practice.

Swift uses a government pilot program to confirm whether Social Security numbers are valid. Company officials have raised questions about the program's ability to detect when two people are using the same number.

Immigration agents have also staged immigration raids at poultry plants in the South. In July 2005, nearly 120 people were arrested at an Arkadelphia, Ark., facility. Three months ago, agents raided a poultry plant in Stillmore, Ga., arresting a similar number who worked there or lived in surrounding counties and busing them to immigration courts in Atlanta, 189 miles away.

___

Associated Press Writer Kim Nguyen contributed to this story.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; alienwoes; crimaliens; crybabyalien; identitytheft; idtheft; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; largest; raids; swift
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: NormsRevenge

LOL ... I be if the bus had stopped and the door had open and two agents had stepped off the bus, Hector Angel's a$$ would've been seen fleeing in the other direction.


121 posted on 12/14/2006 10:32:27 AM PST by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
these perps could have been temp workers, not Swift employees

it is the employment agencies responsibility to verify legal working status. They also provide medical insurance in case of job related injury
with an option to co-pay more comprehensive coverage

the company pays the temp agency $10.00 bucks an hour,
the employee makes $6.50 per hour,


Seems Swift could avoid prosecution this way

and if things got too hot for the temp agency, they'll disappear and restart under a new name
122 posted on 12/14/2006 11:09:16 AM PST by daku ("Behold this creature that walks like a man. It wants ketchup on its hot dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
"Swift uses a government pilot program to confirm whether Social Security numbers are valid. Company officials have raised questions about the program's ability to detect when two people are using the same number."

... "The 40% figure may have resulted from information the feds either gave to Swift or gave to the court when Swift filed for relief. It doesn't make sense to me that a Swift manager would openly admit that Swift breaks the law in 40% of its hires.

I agree completely Bonaparte. I worked in Human Resources for 30 years, and one never would admit that kind of legal culpability unless the number were given to them by the Feds. Besides which, it looks like Swift officials are the ones who raised the red flag on the use of double Social Security numbers. Swift discovered a flaw in the system that could help the US capture even more illegals in the future!

Most here seem to see "shades of Enron", where I do not. If I were Swift, I would have filed suit to delay this, too, so that I could hire legal workers to take their place. If you own a business of any size, you'd realize too, that losing 40% of your workforce all at once could easily shut you down. I don't know if Swift is publicly held, but if it is, the CEO could easily be fired for "fiscal irresponsibility" if he didn't see that suit was filed! Swift got screwed here worse than anyone -- and it was their own proficiency in questioning whether "the SSN's were being duplicated" that led to this. Swift management ought to get a medal for protecting their country ahead of protecting their company. I, for one, will buy Swift brands wherever I can!

Re "hiring workers at half the wages", there was no allegation of "Swift paying these workers under the table"--and if they had been paid under the table, it would have never led to Swift uncovering this scam. You don't think that these captured illegals & their families wouldn't be screaming their heads off about "Swift's illegal practices", if they had? We should assume that these captured were making at least "minimum wage" unless proven otherwise. But as to the "wages being lower than they'd pay other Americans" -- that's the capitalist system, find workers who will do the job to your satisfaction as cheaply as you legally can -- there is nothing wrong with practice that unless you are a socialist! And if you are, what are you doing on a conservative message board?

123 posted on 12/14/2006 11:55:21 AM PST by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
In a written statement, President and CEO Sam Rovit said the company has never knowingly hired illegal workers and does not condone the practice.

I guess they won't miss a few criminals being apprehended then...

124 posted on 12/14/2006 2:46:02 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
I thought the constitution was for American "Citizens"

The Constitution is for everyone under the jurisdiction of the United States government, citizen or not.

125 posted on 12/14/2006 4:30:36 PM PST by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman

[Put up tent camps with guards!]

Joe? Is that you? Give em all pink sheets, clothes and underwear and charge em for their meals.

I'm all for it. I understand there is a fence project that we could use some labor for.


126 posted on 12/14/2006 4:45:08 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: JTN

I learn something new everyday... didn't know that. Thanks.


127 posted on 12/14/2006 6:10:13 PM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Excellent post, Bokababe!


128 posted on 12/14/2006 6:10:20 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Does she really look like she needs her mommy?---I'd say that woman is at least in her 20s.


129 posted on 12/15/2006 10:27:23 AM PST by brooklyn dave (Dhimmis better not be Dhummis!!!!------or else!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

I really think we need to change out citizenship laws. The only way you should become a citizen by birth is if one parent is already a citizen (not even a legal greencard holder). If a child is born of a greencard holder they if they are under 18) become citizens automatically when & if the parents do. There should be no thing as anchor babies. Plus make the English language proficiency much harder for citizenship.


130 posted on 12/15/2006 10:31:52 AM PST by brooklyn dave (Dhimmis better not be Dhummis!!!!------or else!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson