Why Would Gays Want Children?

Townhall ^ | 12/10/06 | Kevin McCullough

[wagglebee]

Is there a more obvious product of heterosexual behavior than the creation of children? If so then isn't it somewhat peculiar that those who shun the behavior of heterosexuality so deeply crave the product that it brings?

This week as I read the news that Mary Cheney, the 37 year old daughter of the Vice-President, was pregnant, I had many such questions running through my head.

I'm not supposed to mind you.

I'm not supposed to be allowed to think such things.

I'm not supposed to openly wonder what such conclusions might mean. Such wondering might bash the belief structure that men and women are completely interchangeable with one another. Yet I wonder them nonetheless. (Call it an ever growing desire to know the truth of the matter.)

Let's face it in America today if we bring up such obvious inconsistencies we are immediately branded and labeled a bigot. I was repeatedly labeled such this week for asking six additional questions arising from the fake act of two women supposedly "becoming parents." Argue with me all you like - the truth is Mary Cheney's baby will share DNA with Mary and the male DNA donor. Genetically he/she will share nothing with Cheney's partner Heather Poe.

So here's the next item I'm not allowed to bring up... Two women who desire children can not achieve satisfaction, because their sexual union is incapable of producing it. And this is fully true - even if all parties involved have healthy, fully functional reproductive biology.

When I mentioned this earlier in the week homosexual bloggers like Andrew Sullivan took exception with the notion and accused me of being hypocritical of the issue when it comes to infertile couples. Yet it is the critics who are being inconsistent.

If a man and wife struggle with infertility, it is because of biological breakdown. What God designed to work a certain way short circuited. He has low sperm count. She doesn't produce eggs as she should. They have trouble getting the two together. The biological dysfunction is not voluntary, they attempt sexual intercourse, time and time again but because of the faulty genetics in the machinery they are unable to complete the conception. And should medicine ever develop a cure for whatever that specific breakdown might be - there will be no problem for the couple, through natural sexual engagement to have another child.

Not so with Cheney and her partner. If they were to choose to engage in sex acts a thousand times over, their biological machinery would never produce what is needed - but for a different reason. There is no dysfunction in this case. Instead the reason the sexual engagement does not work is because the necessary parts are not even present. It is the equivalent of screwing a nut onto a bolt, by using a hammer. They just don't fit.

So after a cacophony of naughty e-mails being sent to me describing thousands of positions a male participant or a turkey baster can be used to impregnate a woman who only has had sex with women, I'm supposed to be intimidated so as to no longer ask these questions.

But they're good questions.

And doesn't the sick attempt at humor reveal what the purpose of my questions was from the very beginning?

In normal relationships the privacy and intimacy of the act of procreation is a spiritual and beautiful thing. In the sexual acts of women who sleep together that adequacy will be something they always long for and never have the satisfaction of knowing, thus undermining the fidelity of what they believe their relationship to be.

In our culture we don't think about our actions from the viewpoint of the One who created us. Rather we obsess about our rights to do what we want, how we want, and as often as we want.

But children are never about what we want. Raising them is about supplying what they need. Britney Spears does no one a service when she gets pregnant on the cheap in a marriage that doesn't last only to end up not providing a father for her children while flashing her nether region for paparazzi. Like wise how moral is it for Mary Cheney to bring a child into society who from the outcome is told that her second mommy is the equivalent of a true father?

There is a reason for homosexual activists to have kids; it is part of the great deception that no one is to question. By having children in the picture the attempt to complete the circle and to convince the world that such a family unit is normal is all important.

Since we do not live in a theocracy it is unreasonable to maintain that Americans will not all make the same choice when it comes to morality and sexual behavior. However that reality has nothing whatsoever to do with whether sexual behavior should be considered moral that extends beyond moral boundaries.

And since homosexuals insist upon desiring limitless sexual activity, not governed by provincial rules and traditions, why would they want children?

Children are the undeniable product of the superiority of heterosexual engagement. And since homosexual behavior in large terms wishes to throw off the weight of conventional sexuality, I am curious as to why they would desire to reinforce the inferiority of their sexual behavior.

And no amount of hate-mail from small minded radical activists will stifle the curiosity from which I seek to learn.

[scripter]

You know what. Some people will never be persuaded by bigotry and prejudice. I doubt you will understadn what I am saying - but I'll give it a try - for the record.

I posted some facts (#21) and you call it bigotry and prejudice. Apparently you can't respond to the facts.

[Howlin]

You know, people who defend human decency aren't necessarily pro-gay. I'm not sure you can make that differentiation, but I thought I'd add it to the thread in case anybody is reading it that might take your posts as authoritative.

[Howlin]

I am wondering exactly what morals and ethics your own parents taught you.

My parents taught me "Judge not, lest you be judged."

[durasell]

Only gays have unlimited "pings." They've even opened trendy stores with names like "Pings & Things" to market them.

It's a degenerate thing,those pings.

[scripter]

Why thank you. In the words of John Adams:

Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.

[Howlin]

I think it does! :-)

[onyx]

LOL

[paulat]

Pingy Dingy would be gay.

DANG! My signature has been "Ping-a-ding-ding!"

(rolling over and nudging) "Boyfriend, does that queer the deal?

"Nope....mmmfflghhhh....zzzzzzzz"

....there you have it....

[gidget7]

Yes quite perfect. Incomplete, however, in that he doesn't state the fact that by having children, these family units and indeed these children themselves are the very tools needed and used to foist homosexual, transgendered, and homosexual parenting teaching on the public school system, and the public in general, including the government. Each time these teachings are objected to by parents of school children, the parents are told, "we must be inclusive, we have all these children who have same sex parents, and we mustn't have them feeling leftout". Before the public and government officials, they cry about how they cannot visit their children in the hospital, (a lie) How sad that these children are used as tools to further a political agenda.

When society allows these sexual practices to take center stage, and allow the people practicing them to raise children, society itself is feeding into their version of reality, a false reality. In America, at least when it comes to sexual pleasures, it seems one can invent whatever reality they so choose. However, the government needs to draw the line at laws and ordinances that force others to believe that alternate reality. Thought control, belief control is a very dangerous policy, ask any who fought Hitler. Societies cannot be forced to believe what it doesn't believe, nor can it be forced to ignore reality in favor of some PC alternate belief system that makes absolutely no sense.

[69ConvertibleFirebird]

So they can pretend they are normal.

We have a winner!!!

[Sunsong]

I am not getting the love the sinner, hate the sin here. We should probably just stone all the homosexuals, like the adulterers. That will fix the marriage problem, old testament style.

smile - yes - I live in Utah - and one of these types actually suggested years ago - that all people with AIDS be painted read and banished to an island on the Great Salt Lake.

Good grief - and these people actually wonder why the electorate rejected them. They either have no idea how they come across or they don't care - which is worse.

[gidget7]

"Incorrect. There have been several articles on FR talking about how scientists are developing ways to turn female eggs into sperm and vice versa. So down the road it could be conceivable for two women to "create" a kid with their own DNA."


Thus a genetically engineered child.



"Oh please. This smacks of Hiterly's "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" charges."


You have it quite backwards.

[dogbyte12]

, the government needs to draw the line at laws and ordinances that force others to believe that alternate reality.

I agree. Enough of that Creationism crap in schools just to please some parents who are into a reality that is alternate to science. You said it well.

[scripter]

Here ya go: You know, people who defend facts aren't necessarily obsessed. Yet facts are still facts.

[Tijeras_Slim]

Does this mean Chuck Berry is gay?


When I was a little biddy boy
My grandma bought me a cute little toy
Two Silver bells on a string
She told me it was my ping-a-ling-a-ling

My Ping-A-Ling My Ping-A-Ling won't you play with My Ping-A-Ling
My Ping-A-Ling My Ping-A-Ling won't you play with My Ping-A-Ling

When I was little boy In Grammar school
Always went by the very best rule
But everytime the bell would ring
You'd catch me playing with my ping-a-ling

Once while climbing the garden wall,
Slipped and fell had a very bad fall
I fell so hard I heard birds sing,
But I held on to My ping-a-ling

Once while swimming cross turtle creek
Man them snappers right at my feet
Sure was hard swimming cross that thing
with both hands holping my pingaling

Now this here song it ain't so bad
Prettiest little song that you ever had
And those of you who will not sing
must be playing with your on Ping-a-ling

[Howlin]

What you're posting couldn't be construed as "facts" on your best day.

[durasell]

What some people don't realize is that for every gay guy/gal there is a family -- mother, father, sisters, brothers, etc. -- who vote.

That wasn't always the case, but it is today.

[gidget7]

"For the same reasons heterosexuals want children, I would guess. "



I know a couple of homosexuals. Their words not mine: If I wanted children I wouldn't be gay7"

[69ConvertibleFirebird]

this stuff is hysterical.

Yes, it is. And since male homosexual behavior takes, on average, 20 years off of one's life it's even funnier! With our great senses of humor we should be teaching children to smoke cigarettes because that only take a few years off of one's life. What a great laugh we can have encouraging children to smoke!!! Oh... hysterical!!! I'm laughing along with you...

[scripter]

What you're posting couldn't be construed as "facts" on your best day.

That's why you've been able to discredit everything I've posted. Uh-huh. Sure. Go ahead. Try. You can't. I know it, you know it, and soon everybody reading this will know it. You're going to back down and/or make up excuses because what I've posted is fact. I can't wait to see what you're going to say next.