Posted on 12/10/2006 11:40:56 AM PST by lowbridge
Posted by Noel Sheppard on December 9, 2006 - 13:07.
Fox News correspondent and comedian Dennis Miller was at it again Friday night. In his Real Free Speech segment, Miller took on Iraq War defeatism, and wisely explained why winning over there is important for Americas future (video available here courtesy of our friend at Ms Underestimated). As always, this works best if you read along while watching or you will miss the marvelous sight gags:
Hey there, folks. Tonight I'm going to talk about defeatism about the war here on the home front. Ah, but what good would it do me to talk about defeatism? It's not like it's going to change anything. You see how whiney that tone sounds? You think our enemy loves hearing that? Of course they do.
Now the recurrent through line of the naysayers in this country is that this is our Vietnam. Well, if it truly is, just Google Dr. Hang Noor to remind yourself what happened after we split there.
Each week we place a different burr under our saddle to work ourselves into a negative lather. Last week, it was which media outlet would be the first to catch the civil war bouquet. Ernie Powell must be spinning in his grave like Earl Monroe in the lane.
This week, we'll use the leaked Rumsfeld memo, citing the need for a major adjustment in the Iraq. By the way, federal government employees leak more often than a frat pledge with a caper-sized bladder.
You know, I always thought the reason we went into Iraq was to look scary again. There's a reason people didn't want to go across the middle on Ronnie Lott, and a lot of had to do with rep. Ostensibly, we're in Iraq to reinvigorate our brand.
But here at home we're proving ourselves soft, and the enemy knows it.
What's wrong in Iraq, quite frankly, is that we're not brutal enough to the insurgents. Now, if a majority of Americans decide that they're willing to continue down that path, because as Billy Crystal's Fernando character reminded us...
BILLY CRYSTAL, COMEDIAN: It is better to look good than to feel good.
MILLER: If that's the approach we're going to use against an enemy that's quintessentially evil, well, so be it. Majority rule. I'll go along for the ride because you are my peeps, and I'm here all the way to the results show.
But you know, as well as I do, that if we don't fight back, it will be the end of us.
And I think it's hard to get your head around the fact that your country might have to destroy some folks. I know I found it unsettling when it first crept into my frontal lobes. And I was even late to the table. I know people who thought it was go-time after the attack on the Cole. Not me. I signed on after 9/11, which around half of you out there did.
If we choose defeatism, I assume that more of you will RSVP after the inevitable next incident. You know where to find the rest of us.
Until then, all I ask of my country is that we don't beat ourselves and that we remain a place where Gwyneth Paltrow refuses to live.
Back to you, Heckel and Jeckel.
Go for a year without television and report back. Unless you've experienced it for yourself, you have no idea what you're talking about.
We have "enjoyed" them for years, in hotel rooms and during stays in at the homes of relatives. We have enjoyed their programs on DVD and video, on our own terms. I don't judge people who make it a daily habit to watch hours and hours of television -- but I will certainly and quickly flock to and identify with the rare folks who have experineced what I have -- life in America without TV -- not for a week, not for a month, but for YEARS. It is simply amazing and indescribable how it enriches your life. That is, simply, the way it is. I sincerely, passionately recommend it to any thinking person or family.
Anything you can learn on the History or Discover channel, you can learn BETTER by reading books or taking classes. More important, you can TAILOR IT to your individuality. Sure, "... if one uses their time learning and enjoying other things," as you way, but the thing is, when you can sit passively and have pre-packaged edu-tainment delivered for the cost of cable per month, you will never desire to use that time learning and enjoying other things on your own unique terms.
The thing that happens is that touchy people immediately take offense when people like me talk about how great life is without TV. Touchy people immediately assume I'm taking an "elitist moral high-ground." I say, that's their problem, their perception, their choice to be offended.
I hated Miller on Monday Night Football, but he's great as a political commentator. The best part of his segments is the sour look on commie colmes' face when Miller finishes.
bttt
There's no valid excuse for not having a working television in your home today.
It's medieval.
Rather, I am amused.
I've lived BOTH ways. You've only lived one way. Your pronoucement that living without TV is "medieval" reveals self-imposed intellectual limitations. The fact that you seem to think that being without TV will harm you in some way is ... not worthy of you, my friend!
I'm saying that I can watch a great program on the stars and sun while cooking dinner and eating, cleaning house.
You can't multi-task very well reading the same information.
You seem to have a mental picture of people sitting in a darkened room...one hand on a remote and the other inside the waist of their pants...ala Al Bundy.
And for all you television challenged out there....that's a character in a sit com, Married with Children.
??????????????
So how do you watch the NFL? Go to a local bar? LOL!
Hard to imagine a person without at least a small 13" tv in the house but I suppose on some days when I feel like throwing my shoe through the screen it may not be a bad idea. But still....
You know what's really funny, is that in my past 30 years of experience, successful entrepreneurs and self-employed people who make their livings in creative endeavors and work they love, don't care much about television, for the most part. If they had to go without, they wouldn't particularly miss it, and they certainly do not view it as a neccessity for getting by in the modern world!
In my experience, people who think TV is neccssary to modern life are those with unchallenging boring work; folks who work under the thumbs of other people; folks who come to our eccentric little house and marvel at what a cool place it is (the reason they don't invite people to their own places is because they spend all their time sitting on their asses "being educated" in front of the TV instead of making and doing neat things for themselves); folks who have never experienced the enrichment that life without TV can give them -- in short, people who have no idea of the productive and creative energy they have within themselves, folks with no idea of the really super-cool things they're capable of, because from the time they were children, they have invested the majority of their leisure TIME in watching TV.
Honestly, Patriot, what have you got to lose? One lousy year!!! Of what???? *sheesh!!!* While what you potentially have to gain -- is immeasurable. It is ridiculous to write it off so cavalierly as you do.
When is this on? I miss his old show and caught him on Jay recently where it's obvious he's lost none of his wit ... Fridays at what time?
Thanks for the info in advance.
Once you watch a baseball playoff game in hi-def, all bets are off. ;^)
Radio or radio drama/comedy tapes are my choice. TV is made for watching -- because I love good film as much as anybody, I sometimes cook and iron and do housework with a documentary on the VCR/DVD in much the say way you're talking about here -- but I am aware that it doesn't challenge my imagination the way that listening to the radio or music or a tape does. Really, again, the only thing I can say is, you have to experience the alternative long-term, like a year, to appreciate the profound but subtle difference. Audio, like reading, invites you to imagine your own imagery; TV doesn't invite you to do that -- it invites you to pause what you're doing and look at the screen. Listening to TV without watching is like tasting wine without swallowing. If you didn't have TV, you'd have to find alternatives -- listen to some unexpected radio (AM radio is simply wonderful, enlightening, and the immense variety on a long-distance radio receiver is incredibly entertaining and enlightening), or radio drama on tape, or music. I've been there -- I know the difference.
You got me there ... I do love the World Series often enough.
I was more ahead of the curve. It was go-time back in 79, when the took over the embassy.
Sorry for assuming you were male...(my use of 'buddy') ;^)
My son has no TV in his house in Seattle. Of course, he's just 1/2 a mile from Duke's Clam Chowder Emporium...
I havent the slightest idea. I havent got cable tv, so IU dont even know what channel he is on, much less when.
Well, the graphic attached to the article says "Fox News" so I'm guessing we have the channel nailed down. :)
I always though that he went by train. History really is something!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.