To: Mo1
It reminds me a bit of the Major government in Britain. No one expected them to win the General Election - things were even being said in local party headquarters along the lines we do not stand a chance of winning so do not want to put a better candidate in as leader. They had thrown the towel in and were preparing for the next election when a better candidate was to be chosen.
How wrong they were; Major got elected and then wrecked the Tory Party, scandal after scandal appeared and he was an ineffectual and weak leader which has caused the last 9 years of socialist government.
I just hope the Republicans do not follow this pattern thinking they cannot win in 2008 so put forward a weak candidate to concentrate on 2012. This spells disaster and makes people even less likely to vote for a Republican in 2012.
255 posted on
12/10/2006 7:58:18 AM PST by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: snugs
"I just hope the Republicans do not follow this pattern thinking they cannot win in 2008 so put forward a weak candidate to concentrate on 2012. This spells disaster and makes people even less likely to vote for a Republican in 2012." I share your concern, because of the RNCs incomprehensible choices of congressional/gubernatorial candidates to concentrate on this year compared to those they left completely out in the cold. They seem to be preparing to bow to Hitlary in '08.
286 posted on
12/10/2006 8:15:19 AM PST by
cake_crumb
(When "bipartisan study groups" try to prosecute wars, you get Viet Nam)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson