Posted on 12/10/2006 2:22:58 AM PST by goldstategop
We will still win this war but we are going to absorb some horrific damage before we let loose the nukes, and we will do that- when there is a Democrat in the WH with his Democrat Congress. It will be done in panic and anger, anger at the betrayal by the Democrats' allies whom the Democrats have done so much for and now the Stab In The Back as the third or fourth WMD device destroys a major portion of an American city. The will have finally realized that the perps are not just individual renegades that have eluded control by those wonderful mullahs and all the FBI work in the world is not going to do anything useful.
you are correct...jsut ask G W Bush's grandfather prescott...he was on par with carter/baker/joe kennedy!!!!
Well, we surely won't be so lucky.
The MSM and Liberals will be promoting this as the necessary "fix" for Iraq - every single hair-brained recommendation in a seamless web. It will be touted for the Iraq War as the 9/11 Commission Report is touted as the definitive document on 9/11 and the WOT, the Holy Grail of answers and solutions, until "nobody" questions it and any thinking or acting otherwise is evidence of "incompetence" and grounds for impeachment, or worse.
Well, it is Sunday and as long as we're quoting:
"...and women and children will lead them" Isaiah
While I agree the absurdity of the ISG, tagging Baker for the "f'ing Jews" comment in light of shrillary's "f'ing Jew Bastard" as well as the shrill anti-semitism of the modern left remarkably excused by the American Jews tendency to do so much to "f" themselves, brings a red herring to an otherwise sound premise, i.e; the ISG is among the most dangerous pieces of "work" to be visited on the world in the past 100 years.
ISG = Incredibly Stupid Group
1. The ISG doesn't have any paths to victory.
2. The Administration doesn't either, and will likely be incoportating 'some elements' of the ISG themselves. (In the interests of bipartisanship, of course. No more than half, though. Honest. Probably. Maybe.)
So, laugh while we can. These senile old coots may outfox us all, in the end.
:o)
79 is their cumulative IQ.
Bush Lite, of course, that name is already used for something else...
ISG = Israel Should Go.
"Oh, but lest you think there are no minimum admission criteria to James Baker's "Support Group," relax, it's a very restricted membership: Arabs, Persians, Chinese commies, French obstructionists, Russian assassination squads. But no Jews." That's got to cause some Liberals to pause. This is a sell out of the Iraqis first with Baker ready to throw the Jews in next. When will these people get it through their heads that we're all in this fight for civilization together and that Syria and Iran are on the other side?
It would be hard to argue otherwise. Check out this article that also comments on the Iran and Syrai as helpers nonsense: Iraq Study Group: A Substitute for Victory.
It suggests that the entire exercise was not about winning the war, but about saving Beltway ass, does it not?
No other conclusion is possible.
The ISG's plan is the 21st Century's version of the Munich Agreement
As I thought those two boobs Baker and Hamilton were on MTP this morning! Will someone please escort these idiots from the stage? And file their report in the dumpster!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.