Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Gibson Finds Eternal GORY in 'Apocalypto' Movie
New York Daily News ^ | 12/8/06

Posted on 12/08/2006 4:56:23 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta

Mel Gibson is sicker than we thought.

As his new film "Apocalypto" makes clear, he's not just a drinker and a raving anti-Semite, but a man with a grotesque appetite for human suffering and an enormous talent for exploiting it.

There was great violence in "Braveheart," too, but it was cloaked in historical context. And the stripping of Jesus' flesh in "The Passion of the Christ" had the cover of Scripture. But "Apocalypto" exists solely as an action-adventure and a deft cinematic demonstration of man's capacity for cruelty.

This is the true passion of Mel.

If you can take unflinching views of throats being slit, heads being caved in, a man's face being eaten by a panther, beating hearts torn from men's chests and decapitated heads bounding down the steps of a pyramid, you're in for a first-rate spectacle of inhumanity.

"Apocalypto" is set in the final days of the crumbling Mayan civilization, when drought and disease have driven warriors farther into the Mexican rainforest to collect natives for the sacrificial altar. As no one knows better than Gibson, the gods must be appeased.

One captive is Jaguar Paw (Rudy Youngblood), a gentle hunter/gatherer who hides his pregnant mate and child in a dry well before being led away. At the temple atop a massive stone pyramid, Jaguar Paw is about to meet his maker - or the Mayans' maker, or at least the priest's knife - when fate intervenes.

A total eclipse of the sun convinces the priest that the gods' thirst for blood has been sated, sparing Jaguar and the other captives. But not for long. They're taken to a field and told to run for freedom while Mayan warriors shower them with spears and arrows.

Somehow, Jaguar clears the gauntlet and races into the jungle toward home and his family, with a band of angry, tattooed spear throwers hot on his trail and a tropical storm brewing overhead.

Is Gibson making some kind of comment about the inhumanity of non-Christian cultures - first the Jews, now the Mayans? "Apocalypto" suggests that the pagans are about to be tamed, if not have their souls saved, by Gibson's Catholic forebears rowing ashore from the Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria.

More and more, Gibson's personality problems seem beyond the scope of movie reviews.

In any case, "Apocalypto" is the real deal as a jungle thriller. Its digital cinematography is gorgeous, its makeup and costumes are stunning, and its mostly nonpro cast - speaking in obscure Yucatec and translated with subtitles - is as authentic as the jungle of Veracruz where the film was shot.

Now that "Apocalypto" is being seen, four months after Gibson's arrest and tirade in Malibu, some in the media are asking whether Hollywood can forgive him by bestowing an Oscar.

What an ironic possibility! This is a movie dedicated to bloodlust (forget the gods, can the audience's thirst be sated?) and not the sort of thing Academy voters typically honors with awards.

An Oscar would not be forgiveness; it would be blindness.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: apocalypto; film; films; gibson; mel; melgibson; movies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
There be knees jerking on all sides of this.

If anyone really feels the need to see throats cut up close just google some of the Chechen atrocities for the real thing. If after that you haven't had enough then by all means give Mad Mel your money.

61 posted on 12/08/2006 9:18:58 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
It sounds awful!

There's only 2 movies I've seen where a heart is lifted from a live person....

..Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom..(hated that movie)...

..and Last of the Mohicans...Loved the movie, hated the heart scene.

Even in the Mohican movie, essentially you see the victim's eyes open very wide, but barely see the Indian cutting out the heart.

In Jones movie, the music & drums add to the suspense, but it doesn't DWELL on it for long.

I will pass on this movie....

There is too much happening in real life too horrifying....

..and potential for real horror from the mideast.

62 posted on 12/08/2006 12:41:53 PM PST by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President....2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: randita

Yeah, and Hollywood loves Quentin Tarantino's movies, as well. Maybe Mel should change his name to Sam Peckinpah, Jr.


63 posted on 12/08/2006 12:47:15 PM PST by rabidralph (The pajama-wetters are at it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"Apocalypto" is not for children and several times I just looked away. It has too much realism for some people. But it was mesmerizing, kept me on the edge of the seat, and not a single dull moment. Surely an Oscar contender.
64 posted on 12/08/2006 1:19:52 PM PST by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lx

the reason these guys are so good is that south Park speaks the truth, often pointing out the Emporer who has no clothes. they also target everyone and everything ..so they are fair and have much more material to use in their humor.


65 posted on 12/08/2006 3:01:45 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Yeah--and how about the Tarantino movies? Gore as high camp.


66 posted on 12/08/2006 3:04:06 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
If being an anti semite and saying this movie shows how Bush sacrifices our sodliers in a war that's wrong...that's a conservative?

That sentence didn't make any more sense than your criticism.

nah, Mel just makes snuff films for the massess. the guy is an arrogant self centered violent-loving jerk.

"Snuff films for the masses." Yeah, that's his genre all right. He's never done light comedy or romance or adventure. Nope. Just "snuff films."

Get out more.

67 posted on 12/08/2006 4:16:04 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Gore as high camp.

Exactly. Not that this movie is campy, but if gore serves a purpose, then it shouldn't be avoided any more than any other film element. And the bloody truth is, the Mayans were utter savages.

68 posted on 12/08/2006 4:19:35 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

The usual story is that the Mayan relgion ws not as bloodthirsty is the Aztec. Indeed, it is claimed that the Spanish story about the Aztecs was a lie. But the temples in Mexico smelled like slaughter houses, and horrified even soldiers hardened in war with the Moors.


69 posted on 12/08/2006 4:20:59 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore; Chieftain

Uh, yeah, sure. I suppose Hitler and Stalin were doing the same....just ran out of time to make the connection to Jesus.


70 posted on 12/08/2006 4:53:15 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

You need to take more care in distinguisihing between fantasy and reality. Apocalypto is a movie, no one actually dies. Hitler and Stalin actually killed millions of people.


71 posted on 12/08/2006 5:12:17 PM PST by TexanToTheCore (DE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain

The hypocracy of Hollywood is stunning...there is more raw violence in an episode of The Sopranos than there was THE PASSION. Hollywood thrives on violence...ask Mr. Tarrantino what he thinks of Mel's films. When it comes to Gibson, all of a sudden everyone gets so puritanical. It's incredible.


72 posted on 12/08/2006 5:14:58 PM PST by Hildy ("Death plucks my ear and says - LIVE - I am coming.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Now_is_The_Time
Wouldn't Mayans have been able to accurately predict when eclipses would occur? We are supposed to believe that all of a sudden one happens without them knowing and surprises them enough to alter their ritual practices.

Maybe they started working to figure out when the eclipses would occur after this happened a few times, ruining all their human sacrifice party plans.

73 posted on 12/08/2006 5:15:41 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
WARNING Sarcasm alert for the following (in the spirit of NY Daily News)!

"Oh my fellow white non-papist gentile brothers. If such defense were written for the dead and dying Nazi brothers against the grotesque displays of violence in Roman Polanski's "Pianist" or Spielberg's "Schindler's List", then we wouldn't be burdened under mortal discernment for knowing what is right and what is clearly wrong! Oh! if only the scenes of women being shot in the head/face had been cut! Then we and our actions could have remained ambiguous under the eyes of men and escape history's judgment! Such an ode to violence portrayed on film! If these violence porn loving men receive any honors for reproducing the truth of human cruelty than shame on mankind for honoring the victims of evil!"

END SARCASM

Viva Cristo Rey!
74 posted on 12/08/2006 5:21:54 PM PST by SaltyJoe ("Social Justice" for the Unborn Child)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
I found the film mesmerizing. There were many elements I liked about the film such as the expressions on the actors' faces, the photography, the scenes, and above all the suspense with not a dull moment.

The others with whom I went to see the film plan to go back a second time.

I do not like gore and at spots just looked away. But this is what the Mayans were liked.

75 posted on 12/08/2006 6:01:41 PM PST by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: spanalot
Where in the world did you get your information. Yes the Indians of old ran buffalo over cliffs and then butchered them for the meat to survive. That was before horses and guns. As far as only eating the tongues, that only happened by white hunters that took the hides and the tongues as it was a delicacy to white people. You might try reading a book or two before making a comment like that.
76 posted on 12/08/2006 6:20:05 PM PST by fish hawk (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cap'n Crunch

Babies don't count with Libs.


77 posted on 12/08/2006 6:22:55 PM PST by fish hawk (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I saw the preview for this film last month and it creeped me out. I believe Gibson needs psychiatric help.

Grand Guignol
http://www.grandguignol.com/

 

78 posted on 12/08/2006 6:30:34 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Mel has designated the wrong group as "the enemy" if his rant about the Jews being at fault for all the wars is any indication of his views. It's pretty evident that the Isalmic terrorists are the "enemy", that evil and the devil are the "enemy", so he needs to think that through. Germany had a great resource in the talented and productive Jewish people; what a horrible waste of humanity, from those lost in the Holocaust, not to mention the loss of life among the non-Jewish people of the world. My father survived the war, but it affected our family adversely in spite of all we could do to rise above it. - I'm so sick of the megalomaniacs and egotists of the world, from the politicians to the Hollywood so-called "intelligentsia" imposters.


79 posted on 12/08/2006 6:37:41 PM PST by Twinkie (Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Youre watcfhing too much TV - the conventional wisdom re: indians is largely myth.

..............................

Similarly, where game was plentiful, Indians used only the choicest cuts and left the rest. When the buffalo hunting tribes on the Great Plains herded hundreds of animals over cliffs in the 18th and early 19th centuries, tons of meat were left to rot or to be eaten by scavengers - hardly a result consistent with the environmental ethic attributed to Indians. Samuel Hearne, a fur trader near Hudson's Bay, recorded in his journal in the 1770s that the Chipewayan Indians would slaughter large numbers of caribou and musk ox, eat only a few tongues, and leave the rest to rot.

Indians also manipulated the land to improve hunting. Upland wooded areas from east to west were burned to remove the undergrowth and increase forage for deer, elk, and bison. Indeed, because of this burning, it's possible that fewer "old growth" forests existed in the Pacific Northwest when the first Europeans arrived than exist today.


80 posted on 12/08/2006 6:50:42 PM PST by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson