[Gaffer]

The question is: Did these aborted unborn have the capacity to grow into anything OTHER than a human being?

[avacado]

---
The question is: Did these aborted unborn have the capacity to grow into anything OTHER than a human being?
---

Grand slam reply! BINGO!

[Ultra Sonic 007]

I actually noted this point. :)

[Sacajaweau]

Does this human being have the DNA of both parents? Of course!!

The idea that the "claim of right to kill" belongs to the female alone is an absurdity of this.

Kinda like "A pound of flesh but not one drop of blood". Take anything you want that contains ONLY the DNA of the mother. Everything else (for want of a perfect definition) has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

[MarkL]

The question is: Did these aborted unborn have the capacity to grow into anything OTHER than a human being?

And not just "a human being," but a specific human being. Remember that DNA is used to uniquely identify a human being, and even while in the womb, a fetus has unique DNA, different from both the mother and the father.

This is why the people who claim that the fetus is nothing more than a growth or a bunch of cells are wrong. If that were the case, the fetus would have the same DNA as the mother.

Mark