Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAN FRANCISCO: Navy scuttles plan to commission warship here, citing local politics
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 12-02-06 | Carl Nolte

Posted on 12/02/2006 10:17:05 AM PST by jazusamo

Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter vetoed plans to commission the Makin Island, the Navy's newest and most powerful warship, in San Francisco in 2008 because of a perception that the city is anti-military.

Retired Marine Corps Maj. Gen. J. Michael Myatt, chairman of a high-powered committee that was to support a commissioning ceremony for the Makin Island, said he has been informed that the ship would not be commissioned in San Francisco, as scheduled, but in San Diego.

Myatt said he had been told that the Navy was concerned about San Francisco's refusal to provide a homeport for the retired battleship Iowa, which would be turned into a museum, and for the city school board's decision to abolish junior ROTC training in San Francisco high schools.

One of the factors that turned the Pentagon against San Francisco, he said, was widely quoted anti-military remarks made by various city politicians. Some of the remarks got considerable attention, especially ones made by Gerardo Sandoval, a member of the Board of Supervisors, who was quoted on national television as saying national defense should be left to "the cops and the Coast Guard.''

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antimilitary; california; gerardosandoval; gonavy; homosexualagenda; militarysupport; sanfrancisco; sanfranciscovalues; sanfransicko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2006 10:17:10 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Perception?


2 posted on 12/02/2006 10:19:02 AM PST by Dahoser (It's going to be a long and miserable two years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

HA! Go Navy.


3 posted on 12/02/2006 10:20:26 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I don't think we should worry about ever placing ships or service people in SF and certainly not ever worry about defending it in the event it is attacked. The citizens there seem perfectly happy to go it alone.


4 posted on 12/02/2006 10:22:28 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I'm afraid I don't get it. What's the problem? So some San Francisco trust-fund babies will have to fly down to San Diego to protest and hook up with each other. Big deal.


5 posted on 12/02/2006 10:25:12 AM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

LOL!...It'll be interesting to see what Pelosi, Feinstein and Boxer have to say about this.


6 posted on 12/02/2006 10:25:39 AM PST by jazusamo (Murtha still owes the Haditha Marines an apology-See DogMurtha.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

what goes around comes around...


7 posted on 12/02/2006 10:27:41 AM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Myatt said the Navy had mistaken the views of some political leaders for the views of the majority of citizens in the Bay Area.....
I don't think there was any mistake. The decision to turn down the battleship and stop ROTC were taken by elected officials. They represent the official policy position of the Bay Area. If the voters throw the bums out, then the Navy should reconsider.
8 posted on 12/02/2006 10:27:52 AM PST by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

9 posted on 12/02/2006 10:29:43 AM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Thanks for posting the photo, She's a beauty.


10 posted on 12/02/2006 10:32:21 AM PST by jazusamo (Murtha still owes the Haditha Marines an apology-See DogMurtha.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

WOW!! Impressive!!


11 posted on 12/02/2006 10:36:33 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Nice pic. Thanks.


12 posted on 12/02/2006 10:38:38 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
LOL!...It'll be interesting to see what Pelosi, Feinstein and Boxer have to say about this.

My guess is this brain trust will call for a congressional investigation. Heads will roll.

13 posted on 12/02/2006 10:38:54 AM PST by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
yeah, compared to Pelosi or Boxer, she [the USS Makin Island] is a Prom/Homecoming Queen.
14 posted on 12/02/2006 10:39:37 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

San Fran Nan and her "City by the Bay" will be last on my list of U.S. cities and citizens to defend.


15 posted on 12/02/2006 10:42:36 AM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What type of ship is the USS Makin Island ?


16 posted on 12/02/2006 10:43:50 AM PST by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

"...not ever worry about defending it in the event it is attacked."

And, correctly perceived as our weakest link, it will be attacked.


17 posted on 12/02/2006 10:45:09 AM PST by Let's Roll ( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

She's an amphibious assault ship. Marines, helicopters and landing craft, I believe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Makin_Island_(LHD-8)


18 posted on 12/02/2006 10:49:00 AM PST by jazusamo (Murtha still owes the Haditha Marines an apology-See DogMurtha.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pelosi should keep her hatch shut and for Botoxer and FineSwine, it's still California.


19 posted on 12/02/2006 10:49:32 AM PST by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Bremerton, WA will welcome the ship.
20 posted on 12/02/2006 10:51:53 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson