Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KEATING FOR PRESIDENT?
Real Clear Politics ^ | December 02, 2006 | Robert Novak

Posted on 12/02/2006 9:47:29 AM PST by FloridianBushFan

Former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating, in a recent lunch with veteran Republican political consultant Ed Rollins, explored the prospects of his making a run for president. Rollins replied that he should run only if he could raise a sufficient war chest.

Snip...

The rationale for Keating's presidential ambitions is the absence of a clear and viable right-of-center presidential candidate now that Sen. George Allen has been eliminated by his defeat for re-election in Virginia. Keating is a conservative and a prominent Catholic layman who at one time was a prospect to be George W. Bush's running mate in 2000.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: 2008election; electionpresident; gop; keating; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: kjo

If Torie doesn't like him, that's a sign that he's a REAL conservative.


61 posted on 12/02/2006 12:17:24 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Are you kidding. Allen's political career is over. His next jig will be as a pundit for FOX News IMO.

Or failing that, maybe he can find a job as a stand-up comedian.

62 posted on 12/02/2006 12:23:58 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
New Mexico was also extrmely close in 1960--less than 3,000 vote margin.

For the record, the electoral vote count in 1960 was:

Illinois, 27
Texas, 24
South Carolina, 8
New Mexico, 4
Hawaii, 3

The electoral vote totals were 303 for Kennedy, 219 for Nixon, and 15 for Harry F. Byrd (one of those was a Republican who should have voted for Nixon). 269 votes were needed to win (the total was 537--the House had 437 members because Alaska and Hawaii each had one Congressman, having been admitted after the 1950 census...the 3 votes for DC were first cast in 1964).

63 posted on 12/02/2006 12:25:42 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard

I believe Nixon was the liberal Republican candidate in the primary in 1962, and that his conservative opponent (Shell) is still alive. How close was the general election?


64 posted on 12/02/2006 12:28:04 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

I don't know anything about him except his name. That said, I don't think he's the one I'd vote for because if I ever thought he was worth the Presidency, I'd have remembered him more than I do now...


65 posted on 12/02/2006 12:29:57 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
100% Christian Coalition rating
Law and Order guy
Flyover country values
Pro-marriage
Pro-repatriation for illegals

Rats disliked him too

"The Legislature has yet to get religion," Keating claimed Monday night. "That's to be expected, since two-thirds of them are Democrats."

"During his five years in office Gov. Frank Keating has repeatedly insulted Democratic officials, school teachers and Oklahoma citizens in general," Benson responded. "He has a long history of disparaging remarks about anyone who disagrees with his point of view.

I like the guy.

66 posted on 12/02/2006 12:31:31 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Repeal the 17th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

I like him too. This might be really exciting.


67 posted on 12/02/2006 12:32:45 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The republicans lost a dozen seats because of corruption. I'm not saying Keating is corrupt but we don't need any candidates with Sugar Daddies.

BTW, Army is tied with Navy late in the second quarter. Oohrah!

68 posted on 12/02/2006 12:36:27 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
Are you trying to be an e-thug or is it just your lack of personality?
69 posted on 12/02/2006 12:46:12 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Just one day without polls would be nice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan

I'd sure volunteer to support a double 'Okie ticket of Frank Keating and J.C. Watts!


70 posted on 12/02/2006 12:55:12 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan
Rollins replied that he should run only if he could raise a sufficient war chest.

Someone ping Captain Obvious.

71 posted on 12/02/2006 1:07:13 PM PST by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

At the present time, I have no favorite for the '08 race, aside from current non-candidates SC Gov. Mark Sanford and Business Exec Herman Cain. The rest are damaged, or are phonies. You have a particular pick ?


72 posted on 12/02/2006 1:09:52 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

Yeah, brilliant. Try checking the Constitution which bans just such a ticket. Ronaldus Magnus. hahahaha


73 posted on 12/02/2006 1:10:01 PM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy

Keating is a solid conservative. I wouldn't have a problem voting for him for President. Much easier than McCain or Guiliani for sure.

I just don't think he'll have the money to compete with McCain or Rudy unless he finds a sugar daddy to back him early.


74 posted on 12/02/2006 1:13:59 PM PST by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan

The biggest problem with Keating is that too many people in that big mindless voting rabble out there would confuse him with "The Keating Five". Ironically, that same bunch of morons would make no similar connection with McCain.


75 posted on 12/02/2006 1:14:21 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
The MSM "Macaccaed" Allen.

No, Allen "Macaccaed" himself by getting defensive and apologizing all over the place. I'm surprised he didn't sit down with that Macacca (with a retired judge present) and offer a cash settlement. That would have helped his image. Yeah.

76 posted on 12/02/2006 1:20:02 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan

I still think Dr. Rice would be an ideal candidate!


77 posted on 12/02/2006 1:24:54 PM PST by zeaal (SPREAD TRUTH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; calcowgirl

IL & TX alone were enough to flip it, the rest were superfluous.

I never heard of any fraud in SC on behalf of Kennedy, and it's doubtful the Democrats running the state at the time were going to bother giving him a boost (Sen. Thurmond surely wasn't).

Hawaii in 1960 was still a semi-GOP state (albeit in transition to 'Rat since the mid '50s), and how much fraud that went on there is questionable, and there was a GOP Governor at the time.

As for NM, just a bit of fraud was needed in the southern tier counties along with heavily Hispanic northern ones (like Rio Arriba, which has had corruption for years) to flip the state, although a Republican (and former Governor, Ed Mechem) did beat the incumbent Dem Governor in that election, so one might wonder how come fraud didn't help John Burroughs win a 2nd term.


78 posted on 12/02/2006 1:25:44 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Rudy, but then I am a social moderate (except when I am not), and part of that wing of the party. Rudy however casts a wider net. McCain is too old, and lacks the temperament to be a judicious choice for POTUS, but I do admire Romney, but he would be less likely to win, and has been disingenuous about the abortion issue. I don't mind abortion moderates, I am one, but flip flopping from one end to the other, as the political need arises, on such a life and death issue, as Romney has, just does not set well with me. It just seems like the power imperatives, trumps a bit too much. Not all ends justify means. It suggests a lack of candor, and to use a psyhcobabble term, "centering." Bush for all his faults, of which there are many, is "centered."
79 posted on 12/02/2006 1:28:42 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
Yeah, brilliant. Try checking the Constitution which bans just such a ticket. Ronaldus Magnus. hahahaha

Nice try republicanwizard, but no dice!!! Although it is debatable whether it would ever really matter that under the twelfth amendment the electors from Oklahoma would not be able to vote for J.C. as vice-president, in either case J.C. is now the chairman of J.C. Watts Companies and I believe lives just outside of D.C. in Virginia. Otherwise he could just change his residency a few months before the election like Dick Cheney did. Please feel free to Freepmail your apology to me instead of posting it here to save yourself the embarrassment!

80 posted on 12/02/2006 1:29:51 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson