Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times chairman held talks to take co private-report
MarketWatch ^ | Nov 30, 2006 | MarketWatch

Posted on 11/30/2006 9:59:36 PM PST by mdittmar

New York Times Co. (NYT) Chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and other members of the family that controls the newspaper publisher held talks with a trusted financial adviser about taking the company private, according to a report on the Web site of BusinessWeek magazine.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arthursulzberger; nytimes; oxley; pinch; sarbanes; sarbanesoxley; sulzberger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
How odd.

Why would a "a leading media company with 2005 revenues of $3.4 billion, publishes The New York Times, The International Herald Tribune, The Boston Globe and 15 other daily newspapers" want to go private?

1 posted on 11/30/2006 9:59:37 PM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

"For personal financial planning reasons".


2 posted on 11/30/2006 10:02:02 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

If they have to answer to shareholders, they have to face embarrasing questions like how their editorial bias is turning off readers. If privately held, they don't have to answer any questions.


3 posted on 11/30/2006 10:02:32 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Democracy: The worst form of government, except for all the others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Yeah think about it if they turn NY Times private that mean no stockholder to answer to


4 posted on 11/30/2006 10:05:43 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Because they want to be free of oppressive regulation like Sarbanes-Oxley, which they advocate for thee.


5 posted on 11/30/2006 10:06:15 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Milhous

Pinch hopes to create a false take over value unrelated to the Slimes' terrible financial five year record...


6 posted on 11/30/2006 10:07:58 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Because it may not be a crime to dump your newspapers into the trash unless your a publically traded company trying to hide your loses from your advertisers and wall street.

Yes please take your wretched treasonous enterprise private so that the future torment will be your own and not the unsuspecting duped shareholders.


7 posted on 11/30/2006 10:08:14 PM PST by samadams2000 (Somebody important make....THE CALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Xacly.


8 posted on 11/30/2006 10:09:50 PM PST by samadams2000 (Somebody important make....THE CALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Because they can operate without interference from Wall Street. Simple, really.


9 posted on 11/30/2006 10:10:52 PM PST by Wormwood (Enjoy this post while it lasts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
Yes please take your wretched treasonous enterprise private so that the future torment will be your own and not the unsuspecting duped shareholders.

It would be better this way. The true enemies of America would be more clearly identified.

10 posted on 11/30/2006 10:14:54 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Democracy: The worst form of government, except for all the others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GSlob; Mad_Tom_Rackham; SevenofNine
Take the money and run.

They'll start a "New and Improved Version" for the suckers later.

11 posted on 11/30/2006 10:15:25 PM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Well, I'm not an owner [unless through an index fund], so I could not "take the money and run". I do not know how much they could get for it, given the high fixed costs and the generally uncertain prospects of the genre - but probably it would be quite a chunk. What would Murdoch make out of it?


12 posted on 11/30/2006 10:24:30 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

ROFL that so true new improved version for suckers LATER ROFL


13 posted on 11/30/2006 10:25:59 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Pinch will win and the employees will lose.


14 posted on 11/30/2006 10:28:31 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Why is the Viagra car in NASCAR a Ford and not a Stretch Limo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

There is a hostile takeover move by a guy from AIG and he is a big R supporter who the NYT drug through the mud. Drudge had his name two days ago but I can't find it.

This is a trick to stop an R from taking over.


15 posted on 11/30/2006 11:09:20 PM PST by Goldwater and Gingrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
What would Murdoch make out of it?

A bazillion I imagine,if he was to take NWS private.

16 posted on 11/30/2006 11:17:55 PM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Probably I did not make myself clear. I imagined him buying it from the Sulzbergers and then of course cleaning the augean stables - root and branch.


17 posted on 11/30/2006 11:26:43 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

so they'll still have jobs from which to spew their venom? Leastwise til they go bankrupt away


18 posted on 12/01/2006 12:19:50 AM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Why would a "a leading media company with 2005 revenues of $3.4 billion, publishes The New York Times, The International Herald Tribune, The Boston Globe and 15 other daily newspapers" want to go private?

Because the shareholders are biting their a**es, demanding impossible things like profits.

19 posted on 12/01/2006 12:23:23 AM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar; george76; Milhous; dead

20 posted on 12/01/2006 7:57:17 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The Bush haters on both sides have elected the government they have dreamed of!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson