More found here
It's Official: Media Body Burning Story is Bogus (Shiite vs. Sunni)
http://newsbusters.org/ ^ | November 27, 2006 | Greg Sheffield
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1744813/posts
Posted on 11/27/2006 5:41:07 PM CST by lowbridge
Iraq's War of Perception: "Who is Jamil Hussein?"
http://www.strategypage.com/on_point/20061128212619.aspx
by Austin Bay
November 28, 2006
In 1980 Washington Post reporter Janet Cooke wrote a story entitled "Jimmy's World," the startling tale of an eight-year old "third-generation heroin addict" living in Washington, DC.
Cooke's expose' captured several volatile issues in one tear-drenched package. "Jimmy's World" had drugs, race, poverty, "fast money and the good life."
In 1981 Cooke won the coveted Pulitzer Prize for journalism.
Fine and dandy -except she should have won the Pulitzer for fiction.
"Jimmy's World" was a complete crock. Little Heroin Jimmy didn't exist. The Washington Post, its publisher Donald Graham, and Cooke's editor, Bob Woodward, were all duly embarrassed when Cooke's fraud was exposed. Her Pulitzer was withdrawn.
Woodward (of Watergate fame) admitted he failed to confirm the story. "I believed it, we published it," Woodward said.
In 1973, The National News Council was created to serve as an "independent forum" for encouraging responsible journalism and investigating allegations of press misconduct. My mentor, Norman Isaacs (a Pulitzer Prize-winning editor) served as Council chairman for five years. Major press organizations -especially the New York Times-- dismissed the National News Council as superfluous, arguing it had a "chilling effect" on aggressive reporting. The Council published a thorough study of Cooke's debacle - an examination that was ignored by the great press powers. Shortly thereafter, in 1983, the Council shutdown, due to lack of support.
We now move from Jimmy's World to Captain Jamil Hussein.
Now, if I were "writing hot" -writing for sensational effect-- I would have led with the alleged Jamil's blazing claim: that six Iraqi Sunnis were dragged from a mosque in Baghdad last week, doused with kerosene, and burned to death by a Shia mob. Four mosques were also (allegedly) burned.
The Associated Press ran the dousing story on November 24 and the story was repeated world-wide. (I read it on-line in the International Herald Tribune, a publication owned by the NY Times.)
Sensational, "headline-generating" elements absolutely jam the story: gruesome savagery, mob action, chaos in Iraq.
The AP identified "Police Captain Jamil Hussein" as its source for the story, with a second source identified as "a Sunni elder."
On November 25, the press office of Multi-National Corps-Iraq (MNCI) published press release No. 20061125-09 (see mnf-iraq.com). The MNCI stated that investigation showed only one mosque had been attacked and found no evidence to support the story of the six immolated Sunnis.
The US-based website FloppingAces (floppingaces.net) has published an email from MNCI to the AP that states "no one below the level of chief is authorized to be an Iraqi Police spokesperson." The email also addresses the story of the Sunnis being burned alive.: "neither we nor Baghdad Police had any reports of such an incident after investigating it and could find no one to corroborate the storyWe can tell you definitively that the primary source of this story, police Capt. Jamil Hussein, is not a Baghdad police officer or an MOI employee." The letter is attributed to US Navy LT Michael Dean.
I contacted CENTCOM's Baghdad press office and received an email confirming that Hussein is not a policeman nor does he work for Iraq's Ministry of the Interior (MOI).
FloppingAces noted that the AP has quoted "Jamil Hussein" in at least eight stories since April 2006.
So who is Jamil?
At this point we really don't know. The AP hasn't provided definitive details. Jamil's "burning Sunnis" story now appears to be rather dubious smoke. However, its horrifying headline has magnified a perception of sectarian terror, one advantageous to Saddam's "former regime elements" and Al Qaeda terrorists.
MNCI could be wrong, but the distinct possibility exists that the AP has been misled by its own stringers or duped by an enemy propaganda operation. The AP insists it reported the basic story accurately. However, if Jamil is another "Jimmy," the AP's story -as a weapon in a war of perception-- is far more damaging than Janet Cooke's Washington fiction.
Jamil and his various stories require investigation and substantiation; an AP self-investigation will strike many as inadequate. 25 years ago the NY Times dismissed the National News Council as unnecessary. "Jimmy's World" proved the Times wrong. We need to revive the National News Council - and have it investigate "Jamil's World" muy pronto.
Can someone explain why these reporters and editors are not on trial or charged with treason. I just don't get it.
Take them out or get them out now or else this war is over and it goes down in the history books as another Vietnam in which we never lost a battle in either places.
bump to self
Enemedia bump and ping!
The print media are suffering financially and are reacting, not by being better journalists, but by cutting their newsroom staffs. Notice nearly any newspaper and most national and international news are reprints of articles from AP, Reuters, and to a lessor extent UPI.
That means the left need only control three sources, not hundreds, in order to keep their biased propaganda reported as news.
We already know about CNN and other leftist TV journalism paying off the enemy with favorable reporting just to have "access."
Check also the excellent summaries this evening on the Belmont Club. Wretchard has a great summary and the comments are really great. The comment signed the "Captain and Jamil" made me laugh out loud.
Francis
Judging by the ungracious response from the AP, I'd say that the collusion was knowing and willing.