Posted on 11/26/2006 4:06:45 PM PST by SolidWood
snip
In other action today in Iraq, coalition forces operating near Baqubah engaged and killed four armed terrorists and detained 11 suspected terrorists during a raid that targeted individuals associated with al Qaeda.
...
One of the 11 terrorists detained was hiding in a house dressed as a woman, pretending to nurse a baby, officials reported.
snip
(Excerpt) Read more at defenselink.mil ...
The way I do it, when I want to draw attention to something the title doesn't indicate, is I add it in paranthesis after the title. That way people searching by the title can find it, but it also includes the particulars I want people to notice.
BTW -- this was a good catch on your part.
While it is indeed hilarious -- it also points out, what our troops are facing. If they kill a woman accidentally, because terrorists masquarade as women, our troops are "at fault" according to the MSM, if they don't, they may get killed by the terrorist, when the woman is really a terrorist pretending to be a woman.
Shades of Vietnam, when women or VietKong dressed at women holding a baby, lobbed granades at our soldiers and when they shot back, the MSM was touting that our soldiers were "baby killers", killing women and children.
The terrorists must be eradicated -- otherwise thousands and even millions of innocents may die.
It also puts in double jeopardy, the next Mother/child; who happen to be caught in a cross-fire. And our soldiers, as well and of course. Words cannot describe the low-life classification that these terrorists fit. They are not fit to win; not fit to live. . .period.
Thanks Fair Opinion.
I had already posted the whole press release on The Threat Matrix and noticed that incident, too.
OMG. . .hilarious. 'Laugh alert' on that one.
"I had already posted the whole press release on The Threat Matrix and noticed that incident, too."
As always, you are always way ahead of everyone else. :)
Go ahead and laugh.
Every time something like this happens, we get a whole bunch of new "rules".
Well, you never know, I could miss something.
Smiling
Sorry; these people are NOT about to send us packing.
If we leave; it is not because our Military cannot 'take' this enemy; it is because too many Americans can no longer remember why 'victory' is a 'value'; and no longer understand that 'wars cost lives'; and that they ARE hell; not a Sunday walk in the park. It is because they are forgetting that we have real enemies in the world; and too many Americans no longer want to be reminded of the threats we face from radical Islamists/terrorists.
If we go packing; it is because America lost it's WILL; and because the Liberals and politcal correctness killed it.
Oh, for shame -- a faux lactivist -- belittling and denigrating the efforts of real lactivists everywhere all over the world.
Oooh, a ratback with cleavage!
You don't get it. This isn't about who's the bad ass. It's about who wins and achieves their goals. They know how to break Americas will. They are winning; about to send a superpower packing.
No kidding! ;> I'm surpised that as of yet, whole armies of Terrorists haven't been marching in the streets in Burka and lactating dolls, as they move their op to the next point of IED implantation. MSM would be thrilled if they did, I'll wager. They'd be selling titty shots all over their broadcasts, and the buyers would pay up primo dollars for ad spots.
ping
The bee-keeper suit should be outlawed from all non-muslim societies.
BTW, I never understand why feminazis here don't protest against this obviously anti-human insult (the hijab/burkha/veil, i.e.)?
How does Java The Hut tack without capsizing the boat?
Because the feminazis consider the demise of western culture more important that woman's rights? They, the ACLU, and the muzzies have the same goals; there's just a different method to their madness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.