Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YaYa123
Am I right that last time he did not even vote for his own bill or was that someones re the draft?

How are you feeling and are you up to freeping ? Not scolding just concerned.
63 posted on 11/26/2006 6:28:32 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: snugs

You're right, snugs... The GOP brought up Rangel's draft bill and it was shot down something like 420-2. Even Charlie voted against it. ;)


72 posted on 11/26/2006 6:31:27 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: snugs

You are right snugs.

http://www.hillnews.com/news/100604/rangel.aspx

"October 6, 2004 THE HILL

Rangel votes against own draft measure
By Michael S. Gerber

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) did something a little unusual yesterday. First he protested when Republican leadership scheduled his own bill for a vote.

Then he sent out a letter encouraging his Democratic colleagues to vote against it.

Rangel’s bill, which the leadership had placed on the suspension calendar, would create a national-service draft under which all 18- to 26-year-olds would serve in the military or perform two years of national service as determined by the president. Rangel has been advocating a draft for several years, but he argued yesterday that the bill was too important for the suspension calendar, “which is reserved for non-controversial items,” he said in a statement.

Bills on the suspension calendar cannot be amended on the floor and require two-thirds of the House to clear the chamber.

Rangel accused Republicans of using his bill to assuage fears that President Bush had plans to reinstate the draft, stating, “The Republican leadership decision to place the draft legislation on the suspension Calendar is a political maneuver to kill rumors of the President’s intention to reinstate the draft after the November election.”

He went on to urge Democrats running for reelection to vote no.

“I am voting no, because my bill deserves serious consideration,” his statement continued.

“It should be subject to hearings and to expert testimony. The administration should come and tell us about our manpower needs, about recruitment and retention, about the extent to which out troops are overextended. And they should give us their views about shared sacrifice. If they did all of those things in a serious way, they would have to admit that my bill is an option.”

Democrats said Republican leaders gave them no notice that the Rangel bill was headed to the floor."


398 posted on 11/26/2006 3:15:13 PM PST by YaYa123 (yaya123@No Whining.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson