Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Apparently Sullivan has expanded his definition of Christianist, and continues to slip down the slope towards insanity.

I honestly can't tell from this article if Sullivan favors a federalist approach to addressing the marriage issue or not. I presume he's rather displeased with the recent election results from many states on the issue.

1 posted on 11/22/2006 10:11:02 AM PST by Deut28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Deut28

Has Sullivan formally given up his facade of pretending to be a Christian?


2 posted on 11/22/2006 10:12:56 AM PST by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28
Andrew Sullivan is gay. He doesn't like gay marriage bans and while I don't agree with him, I understand his position.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

3 posted on 11/22/2006 10:13:53 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28
As with most Christianists, the idea of allowing different states to try different solutions to the same problem is dispensable when moral absolutes are involved.

I suspect that Mr. Sullivan is hypocritical on this issue, because I highly doubt he takes a state's rights position on slavery and other moral absolutes.

5 posted on 11/22/2006 10:26:44 AM PST by Jibaholic (Whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Have the rats issued a press release demeaning Romney the way they did when McCain and Giuliani set the wheels in motion for "exploaratory" committees? That will be interesting to see. I have a feeling the rats would prefer to see Romney get the nomination.


11 posted on 11/22/2006 10:51:20 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Sullivan is an idiot, but he is right that there is a certain section of the base that cares about federalism only when it suits their ends and not otherwise.

That said, he exaggerates that section's size and distorts the extent of their positions and oversimplifies the Gay Marriage issue far too much.


12 posted on 11/22/2006 10:53:38 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Sully sealed it for me,

Where do I get my Romney bumperstickers?


13 posted on 11/22/2006 10:55:24 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Sulllivan is so blinded by his obsession with the male anus, that he can't see anything else.


14 posted on 11/22/2006 10:55:25 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

How on earth do you handle this issue federally? Let me explain the problems with doing this one on a state by state issue:

1. People move. If two guys get married in Vermont and later move to Oklahoma are they still married?

2. The IRS. Does the Vermont couple file jointly as married and the Oklahoma couple not?

3. That 14th Ammendment. Yes, we don't care for it, but it'll mean the courts will decided this on a one size fits all matter.


18 posted on 11/22/2006 10:57:52 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

John McCain has made a deal with the radical gay activists to support gay marriage. This agreement give cover to some of the gay Republicans who were being threatened by the rabid, gay activists. I am thinking specificly of Lindsey Graham, who became a target during the impeachment, but was given a pass, once he joined the McCain camp.

The support of Andrew Sullivan should be a red flag for any Republican candidate. Sullivan is a one issue kind of guy. Sex is apparently all the man can think about.


20 posted on 11/22/2006 10:59:23 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Better a christianist than a butt-piratist, Andy.


22 posted on 11/22/2006 11:01:40 AM PST by Antoninus (I refuse to vote for a liberal--regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

It doesn't take a Christian to be disgusted by sexual deviancy and the high cost of medical support required by the deviants. Even the Muslims find this behavior reprehensible, not to mention a myriad of others.


26 posted on 11/22/2006 11:04:13 AM PST by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Andrew Sullivan is a Homosexualist.


29 posted on 11/22/2006 11:06:20 AM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28
Apparently Sullivan has expanded his definition of Christianist, and continues to slip down the slope towards insanity.

Towards insanity? Hell, he beat me there by at least a country mile!

Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

40 posted on 11/22/2006 11:16:27 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Republicans are told to court "the base," which translates to Arabic as "al-Qaeda.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28
Michael Savage has said something in the past on gays and "missing the mark" regarding sexual sin as well as positions aside of those taken in the sexual life.

To paraphrase him:

"Look how close you can be and still have it make all the difference. Consider the gays. They are only about an inch and a half off the mark, but look at all the difference it makes."

51 posted on 11/22/2006 11:38:31 AM PST by dersepp (I Am A Militia Of One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

If the Supreme Court ruled tomorrow that all states must recognize gay marriage, do you think Andrew Sullivan would be upset?

Me neither.

He's in favor of federalism when it suits him, not otherwise. But see, that's better than "Christianists" having the same attitude, because, uh, they're meanies.


59 posted on 11/22/2006 12:00:04 PM PST by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28

Since Mormons are not Christians, his basic premise goes bad before he even begins his argument.


65 posted on 11/22/2006 1:52:14 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deut28
[ As with most Christianists, the idea of allowing different states to try different solutions to the same problem is dispensable when moral absolutes are involved. ]

What a queer statement from a normalphobe..

70 posted on 11/23/2006 7:53:34 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson