[BenLurkin]

Yes, that would be racist.

Also pointless and irrelevant.

[vetsvette]

"Yes, that would be racist.

Also pointless and irrelevant."

Pointless and irrelevant is in the eye of the beholder. But, if you think that it would be racist, perhaps you need a dictionary for Christmas. It's not even remotely racist to publish accurate statistics about anything.

[Riverman94610]

Those who like to see the stats broken down by race do so because they get a perverse kick out of showing that blacks and Mexicans have higher rates of unwed mothers.
Then they can infer without saying so that white females are somehow more virtuous than those"other women because they are more "responsible and moral" which is nonsense to anyone who has spent any time with the current crop of women of ANY ethnicity whose morals are dictated by MTV and the whole Sex and the City ethic.

[little jeremiah]

Actually, not pointless and irrelevant, because the last figures I saw stated that among blacks, the figures for illegitimate births were around 75-80%. If that doesn't scare people, I don't know what will.

The black family has been almost destroyed by welfare. And a few other things. But when there are few intact families, things go to he!! in a handbasket very quickly.

[WorkingClassFilth]

No, that would be informative. In fact, because they didn't break it down by race except to note an increase in illegitimate hispanic births is racist by design in that it deliberately fails to completely inform the reader what group is driving this shift. Obviously, we have a problem in black America and that is where the greatest problem lies. Black America is looking at nearly 75% illegitimacy and that is a problem for us all that will only get worse if we avoid the facts and play some phony PC game where we ignore the monstrous disorder in American under classes.

[I still care]

I don't think it is irrelevant.

Granted, some people will draw racist conclusions, but some cultures are less likely to marry than others. My thought is, those will also vote heavy democrat.

When you have no helpmate to help you rear your children, which is really a two person job, then you often turn to the government to help you with your family. It's the foothold in the door the libs have.

I think that is a relevant point.

[albie]

Yes, that would be racist.

Also pointless and irrelevant.

...you are kidding aren't you? "pointless and irrelevant"?
90% are black/african americans/negroes. The welfare state and the nanny state are both to blame for this. Instituted by Lyndon Johnson and known as the "Great Society". Enacted to eventually guarantee votes to dems for years to come. Which it has and will continue. This is why blacks always vote dem. They are dependant on the government. They have no responsibilities...don't need to.