Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU Launches Campaign Against Random Searches
Stop The ACLU ^ | 21-Nov-06 | John Stephenson

Posted on 11/21/2006 10:35:50 AM PST by Jay777

Since the ACLU thinks random searches are so terrible, and no one came to them to complain about the MBTA, they have decided to advertise in search of some clients.

Civil liberties activists yesterday launched an advertising campaign to question the MBTA’s random bag inspections and collect customer complaints that could lay the groundwork for a lawsuit.

The advertisements, which ask customers to tell their stories of being searched, will run on the T’s subway system during the next 10 weeks.

“We’re trying to have the public serve as our eyes and ears to see how this policy is being implemented and to see if it’s leading to an unconstitutional infringement on people’s rights,” said Carol Rose, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts.

The T reinstituted random bag inspections in October after a pair of federal court rulings that upheld the constitutionality of a similar inspection program in New York City. The T has also trained its police officers and front-line personnel to use behavioral recognition techniques to spot suspicious activity in passengers.

The ACLU is against any kind of search no matter how it will protect us. They are against profiled searches, random searches, and searches across the board. If it were left to the ACLU there wouldn't be any kind of searches allowed. Strange that the NYCLU has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search.

It seems the searches are not the only security enhancement the ACLU is worried about. The complaint could not be complete without the race card being played.

(Excerpt) Read more at stoptheaclu.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aclu; aclutreason
MORE AT STOP THE ACLU
1 posted on 11/21/2006 10:35:51 AM PST by Jay777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jay777
The ACLU would demand Islamofascists have the right to carry nuclear bombs. Why not? America is eevil.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

2 posted on 11/21/2006 10:37:32 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepCath; Liz; IronJack; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; Iris7; wkdaysoff; EdReform; Nick Danger; ...

PING!


3 posted on 11/21/2006 10:38:50 AM PST by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Instead of random, how about searches based on profiling?


4 posted on 11/21/2006 10:40:34 AM PST by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

Follow the links, they oppose those too.


5 posted on 11/21/2006 10:44:05 AM PST by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

...in a related story, Google's stock falls 98%...


6 posted on 11/21/2006 10:45:14 AM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Here is the hypocrisy of the ACLU...apparently atht e ACLU HQ in New York City, before visitors are allowed to enter the premises of the ACLU's office there is a sign that reads "All visitors are subject to search"

This, as was previously reported by the folks at Stop The ACLU:

http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/


7 posted on 11/21/2006 10:50:33 AM PST by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
If random bag searches are banned and there is a
subway bombing, then the SOB lawyers at the ACLU
better watch their backs. They will have made some
hardcore enemies amongst the public....JJ61
8 posted on 11/21/2006 10:50:57 AM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

I like that idea. Why doesn't the ACLU complain about them checking your bag and jacket when you enter a Bruins game?


9 posted on 11/21/2006 10:51:19 AM PST by Holicheese (Beerfest could be the greatest movie ever made!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Good work. Thank you for posting this, and all you do.


10 posted on 11/21/2006 10:55:28 AM PST by PghBaldy (Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
The devil visited an ACLU lawyer's office and made him an offer. "I can arrange some things for you, " the devil said. "I'll increase your income five-fold. Your partners will love you; your clients will respect you; you'll have four months of vacation each year and live to be a hundred.

All I require in return is that you spend your life doing everything within your power that you possibly can (including lying, cheating, coniving, misrepresenting facts and even fabricating false evidence if needed) trying to destroy the very fabric of the U.S. government and everything it stands for.

The ACLU lawyer thought for a moment. "What's the catch?" he asked.

11 posted on 11/21/2006 11:01:16 AM PST by Traditional Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Time to launch a campaign against the ACLU...


12 posted on 11/21/2006 11:12:20 AM PST by Maeve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

They complained and won to get rid of searches at Tampa Bay Bucs games and also sued the Chicago Bears. Not sure what that outcome was.


13 posted on 11/21/2006 11:25:31 AM PST by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

How much do you want to bet that if one of these asshats got stabbed in the spine, they would be the first to sue because the stadium didn't keep them safe.


14 posted on 11/21/2006 11:29:18 AM PST by Holicheese (Beerfest could be the greatest movie ever made!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
"Grabauskas said, 'Racial profiling is absolutely useless to us. This is training that points us in the direction of someone who may be acting suspiciously.'"

Um, what????????????????? What a moron. And I mean moron in it's true definition. That's not 'racial profiling,' that's acting on someone being shady.

So more about the ACLU. My bf's boss is completely conservative and they were at a business dinner. One of the attendants of the dinner told him, not sure why, that he is a member of the ACLU and my bf's boss got up and left the table. The guy was a little confused about that reaction and every else left sitting there replied with something to the effect "um, most people feel that the ACLU doesn't represent anything America is based or founded on. Real Americans don't like the ACLU or it's members." The guy was flabbergasted as though he lives on Mars or something. Can we say CLUELESS??
15 posted on 11/21/2006 11:52:56 AM PST by panuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
The ACLU is against any kind of search no matter how it will protect us.

No surprise there. I wonder if that applies to security to get into their headquarters.

16 posted on 11/21/2006 12:05:03 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Here is the hypocrisy of the ACLU...apparently atht e ACLU HQ in New York City, before visitors are allowed to enter the premises of the ACLU's office there is a sign that reads "All visitors are subject to search"

Searched by New York City Police, or by a private entity? Blackbird.

17 posted on 11/22/2006 4:37:36 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson