Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brain-damaged woman must be given 'wake-up' pill, orders judge
Daily Mail ^ | 11/20/06 | LUCY BALLINGER

Posted on 11/20/2006 1:49:59 PM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: sgtbono2002
Just let me go: I dont want to be only able to stand and clap my hands and I dont want to make paupers of my family by adding expense after expense in keeping me alive.

From the end of the article: "She smiles broadly and can even use a keyboard to communicate with people, telling them how she now hopes to speak again." No details on how sophisticated that communication is; there are plenty of instances of people deluding themselves into thinking that they're hearing from loved ones, from Ouija boards to the dubious "facilitated communication" with autistics.

If I had a life like Stephen Hawking's, I'd want to stay alive. But if I were fully conscious and aware, incapable of movement or communication, I can't imagine anything closer to hell on Earth. Especially if I had no or limited sensory input.

People in conditions of complete sensory deprivation suffer a mental crisis in a matter of minutes -- our brains are hard-wired to absorb information about our surroundings, and when deprived of input, they start making up their own. Horrid hallucinations in all five senses, intense panic; imagine the worst nightmare you've ever had, and then imagine that you can't wake up and it doesn't ever stop.

41 posted on 11/20/2006 2:43:39 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
If she wakes up and wants to go back to sleep, she can then make the decision herself on whether she wants the drug or not.

Only if she can communicate the decision. The article isn't clear on how likely that is.

42 posted on 11/20/2006 2:45:44 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
heoretically the patient could then spend the rest of her life severely disabled and aware of her condition.

I was refering to this

43 posted on 11/20/2006 2:48:02 PM PST by CindyDawg (Lord, please open eyes and touch hearts and provide us with Christian Leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: California74

I have it written down and I have named my brother as the Judge as to when it is to be carried out. I picked him because he knows how I feel and has the guts to carry it out. My wife and kids shouldnt have to make that decision they would let their emotions rule them ,I feel my brother is capable of making the best decision.


44 posted on 11/20/2006 3:16:27 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

It's a big enough difference that the pills work on people in a PVS -- they don't work on the brain dead.


45 posted on 11/20/2006 3:21:12 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
"It's a big enough difference that the pills work on people in a PVS"

No, it hasn't been determined whether or not they'll work on a PVS patient.

46 posted on 11/20/2006 3:36:50 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
"they don't work on the brain dead."

My guess is that they won't work on PVS patients either.

This is starting to cross over into the Dr. Frankenstein arena -- actually worse, the monster had a functioning brain.

47 posted on 11/20/2006 3:43:43 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Precise word usage is critically important. The terms "brain dead" and "PVS" have medical and legal meaning. It's analogous to the difference between the terms "baby" and "fetus". The issues are complex enough without confusing things even more through careless misuse of terminology.

A "brain-dead" person is dead. A person in a PVS is not.
48 posted on 11/20/2006 3:57:37 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

Oh "House" that's a real good authority.


49 posted on 11/20/2006 4:13:44 PM PST by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: conservative blonde

didn't say it was a good authority, just said it was featured.


50 posted on 11/20/2006 4:14:52 PM PST by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: billbears

So are you an anarchist who doesn't believe there should be a state, or do you simply think that invalids have no due process rights? This woman HAS NO LIVING WILL, HER FAMILY ISN'T EVEN SAYING SHE WOULD WANT TO DIE. Who are you to say that this pill might not cure her?


51 posted on 11/20/2006 4:22:46 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
"Precise word usage is critically important."

I agree. Which is why I questioned your (incorrect) statement, "the pills work on people in a PVS".

"The terms "brain dead" and "PVS" have medical and legal meaning."

Yes, and so do the terms "brain damaged", "severly brain damaged", "vegetative state", and "persistent vegetative state".

"A "brain-dead" person is dead. A person in a PVS is not."

Correct. But they do have things in common. Neither will recover. Both are on artificial life support. Neither has consciousness or ever will again.

And both are using valuable and precious hospital resources that can be better used to keep alive someone who has a chance at living.

52 posted on 11/20/2006 4:24:13 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Amen to that!


53 posted on 11/20/2006 4:44:37 PM PST by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor
The researchers think the reason that those with PVS come out of it has something to do with the Ambien which apparently blocks GABA, some kind of hormone or chemical that shuts the brain down to allow it to recover from trauma.

Thank you for answering my question!

54 posted on 11/20/2006 4:46:50 PM PST by syriacus (Millions in South Korea are free because 30,000 US troops DIED in 3 years under TRUMAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

55 posted on 11/20/2006 4:47:19 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

(snort)


56 posted on 11/20/2006 4:49:42 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

I believe this drug was featured on a recent episode of House.




Holy crap! You're kidding right? You don't actually use a TV for medical information. Please tell me you're kidding...


57 posted on 11/20/2006 4:52:31 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Whoa, everybody. I merely mentioned it was featured. I DID NOT say it was a place to get medical information, or that it was a reliable source, or even to what context the show featured it. It was just an observation, and a coincidence seeing it there, meaning I was familiar with the name of the drug. that's all!
58 posted on 11/20/2006 4:58:54 PM PST by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I hope the pill helps her.


59 posted on 11/20/2006 5:07:04 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Does anyone care what the 53-year-old woman wants done? This is her call and as she cannot speak, her spouse if she has one makes the call...then her family. The courts, the church, the rabble on FR should have no say.
60 posted on 11/20/2006 5:18:52 PM PST by Drango (Earth first, we'll strip-mine the other planets later!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson