I agree. Which is why I questioned your (incorrect) statement, "the pills work on people in a PVS".
"The terms "brain dead" and "PVS" have medical and legal meaning."
Yes, and so do the terms "brain damaged", "severly brain damaged", "vegetative state", and "persistent vegetative state".
"A "brain-dead" person is dead. A person in a PVS is not."
Correct. But they do have things in common. Neither will recover. Both are on artificial life support. Neither has consciousness or ever will again.
And both are using valuable and precious hospital resources that can be better used to keep alive someone who has a chance at living.
"Correct. But they do have things in common. Neither will recover. Both are on artificial life support. Neither has consciousness or ever will again.
And both are using valuable and precious hospital resources that can be better used to keep alive someone who has a chance at living."
PVS patients have a chance at recovery. PVS patients breath on their own, hence the only "artificial support" is water and food. PVS patients have been proved by EEG tests to have a highlevel of brain activity.
I am sincerely glad I'm not related to you and you have no chance of ever being involved in a life changing decision that would pertain to me.
This is your opinion. It is not fact.
If it were fact, then patients in a PVS would never regain consciousness, but sometimes, yes, sometimes, they do. You've made a blanket statement and try to apply it to all cases.