Skip to comments.
Rove May Leave Within Weeks
U.S. News & World Report ^
| November 17, 2006
Posted on 11/17/2006 12:00:02 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 421-423 next last
To: dead
LOL. The advisor's name: Luis Lipps.
81
posted on
11/17/2006 12:29:50 PM PST
by
My2Cents
To: West Coast Conservative
Bush isn't running for anything, so what good is Rove now????
His time is up, and I for one, think he has done a very good job....
WTG ROVE!!!
82
posted on
11/17/2006 12:30:00 PM PST
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: Lead Moderator
I LOVE THE SMELL OF OZONE AND FRIED TROLL!
LLS
83
posted on
11/17/2006 12:30:31 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: West Coast Conservative
>>>>.... Rove will leave sometime next year are being bolstered with new insider reports that his partisan style is a hurdle to President Bush's new push for bipartisanship.Rove maybe a partisan, but he's no conservative.
So, Rove is leaving in order for Bush to hold hands with Democrats and capitulate to their desires. Wow.
84
posted on
11/17/2006 12:30:36 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: West Coast Conservative
The
rumors that chief White House political architect Karl Rove will leave sometime next year are being bolstered with new insider reports
[read: unsourced] that his partisan style is a hurdle
[blatent bias] to President Bush's new push for bipartisanship. A key Bush advisor
[read: unsourced] tells the US News Political Bulletin, "Karl represents the old style and he's got to go if the Democrats are going to believe Bush's talk of getting along."
[this is an opinion of one individual (not Rove), not an action] The advisor said a departure
might come in "weeks, not months."
[read: purposely vague] A Rove ally
[read: unsourced], however, noted that he has a record of out-witting his critics.
[read: irrelevant opinion] So what does this article really say?
Someone, although we're not going to say who, doesn't think Rove works well with democrats. And that certain someone thinks that Rove is going to leave.
Of course no attempt was made to ask Karl Rove.
85
posted on
11/17/2006 12:31:38 PM PST
by
kidd
To: West Coast Conservative
I can think about six explanations for this story.
1. Bush has gone through is last election and Rove wants to get on to fresh pastures.
2. This anonymous insider is one of Rove's rivals for the inside track.
3. Some other insider is trying to push Rove out.
4. Bush is getting tired of Rove.
5. Bush is sending Rove to manage the campaign of his replacement in the White House.
6. This reporter is mistaken.
7. This reporter is lying, and made the whole thing up.
Oops, that's seven. And I could probably think of ten more.
86
posted on
11/17/2006 12:32:25 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: West Coast Conservative
Rove should leave because, well, W. is not running for anything in 2008. He should hitch his wagon to a good candidate's cart and help them win in 2008.
To: Lunatic Fringe
Bush has always been a closet Democrat So was his dad. I wish more voters had realized this in 2000. Heck he even told them he was such and they still didn't believe him. As for Rove. Wish it had been 5 years ago. His resignation this afternoon would be nice
88
posted on
11/17/2006 12:34:00 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: jrooney
i hope your right.
Bush did not win in 2000 and 2004 by flip-flopping and by giving in to the Dims!
To: pgyanke
IMHO part of being a Statesman is getting along with the Democrats. The President is the President of the United States not just he Republican Party.
90
posted on
11/17/2006 12:35:05 PM PST
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: STARWISE
Okay....I do NOT understand this..or believe it.
SOMEONE is advising President Bush all wrong...if they are telling him he NEEDS to be bipartisan...because the dems are NOT going to be...
BTW...did you take me off your ping list??? Please don't...I love your pings...
91
posted on
11/17/2006 12:35:05 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
To: harpu
I think your response is way out of line.
92
posted on
11/17/2006 12:36:26 PM PST
by
Buck W.
(If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
To: edsheppa
What are you on about they did Roberts and Alito
93
posted on
11/17/2006 12:36:29 PM PST
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: cva66snipe
Bush, by this time in 1998, had more money in is pocket to run with than any other candidate in history. The conservatives didn't "make" Bush, my FRiend. He is the creation of the RINO Country Club Rockefeller types, the CFR, NE Olde Money, the Bildebergers, the Trilateral Commission, etc, etc, etc...
94
posted on
11/17/2006 12:37:30 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(Democracy = Anarchy)
To: Howlin
Seems that a lot of people were happy tht the election turned out the way it did just so they could say I TOLD YOU SO.
Kind of breaks my heart to know the troops were thrown under the bus by spite-mongers.
95
posted on
11/17/2006 12:38:12 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(WEAKNESS IS A PROVOCATION, AN INVITATION TO OUR FOES TO CONFRONT US)
To: paudio
Pushing a dream of bipartisianship is just that: a dream. Cue fantasy music.
96
posted on
11/17/2006 12:38:37 PM PST
by
sarasota
To: West Coast Conservative
Meh... don't read to much into this. Rove is likely leaving to work on somebody's 2008 campaign.
97
posted on
11/17/2006 12:39:10 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
To: OldFriend
They're not our "troops"........you can bet that.
98
posted on
11/17/2006 12:39:30 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: OldFriend
I'm trying to figure out why some here still act like President is running for reelection?
99
posted on
11/17/2006 12:39:56 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
To: snugs
Are you suggesting that our President is the President of all the people, not just a certain group?
/s/
100
posted on
11/17/2006 12:40:51 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(WEAKNESS IS A PROVOCATION, AN INVITATION TO OUR FOES TO CONFRONT US)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 421-423 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson