LOL! The Old Grey cathouse keeper of liberal democrat party "values", are chucking nancy under the Bus.
Pinchy Salzberg is having a hissy fit, over nancy's machinations.
It seems he knows that the ruse they propagated is coming asunder.
1 posted on
11/17/2006 8:34:42 AM PST by
Dane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Dane
To: Dane
Has Bela Pelosi even BEEN ELECTED speaker yet?
You got to wonder if maybe they'll choose someone else.
3 posted on
11/17/2006 8:37:45 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Dane
The NYT shows itself to be on the side of...Hillary!
5 posted on
11/17/2006 8:38:09 AM PST by
Bahbah
(Regev, Goldwasser and Shalit, we are praying for you)
To: Dane
"The well-known shortcomings of Mr. Murtha were broadcast for all to see"
I don't remember seeing this in the MSM before the elections.
To: Dane
The New York Times (aka:The old Gray liar) clearly does not understand the SanFranValues coming to the table from the new Speaker.
7 posted on
11/17/2006 8:38:46 AM PST by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Dane
Yeah, but Rush pointed this out the other day.....
If Murtha's past actions raise ethics questions about his fitness to be Majority Leader, why is he even a Congressman in the first place? Too corrupt to be leader, but not corrupt enough to be defeated by Irey.
8 posted on
11/17/2006 8:38:48 AM PST by
edpc
(Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
To: Dane
The RNC would have been smarter to lay low, let the Murtha nomination proceed, then let the dogs loose on him at a more opportune time.
11 posted on
11/17/2006 8:40:06 AM PST by
Michael.SF.
(Note: Sell Diebold Stock.................NOW!!)
To: Dane
Boy, Pelosi didn't waste any time sowing discontent in her ranks, did she? And she hasn't even taken office yet!
12 posted on
11/17/2006 8:40:29 AM PST by
blitzgig
To: Dane
>>As incoming speaker, Ms. Pelosi will be dogged by skepticism from within the party and without about her political smarts and her ability to deliver a galvanized agenda.<<
No surprise. She is a genuinely stupid person.
13 posted on
11/17/2006 8:40:58 AM PST by
SerpentDove
(It's not rocket surgery.)
To: Dane
keeper of liberal democrat party "values", are chucking nancy under the Bus.Nancy will not serve the full two years.
14 posted on
11/17/2006 8:41:23 AM PST by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: Dane
Cronyism trumps most things in "in house" politics. Pelosi
had to back Murtha. Murtha is the one who should have realised he was damaged goods, but Murtha was arrogant enough to try anyway and Pelosi takes most of the damage. It is fine by me!
To: Dane
"Mr. Murtha would have been a farcical presence in a leadership promising the cleanest Congress in history."
Were they writing this before the election?
I'm shocked...shocked that there is hypocrisy the the NYT's!
To: Dane
We all know that the recent loss of congress is a major blow for the wellbeing of the nation. The rats new ability to obstruct any judicial appointments (especially Stevens replacement) is a grim and sad situation for anybody with half a brain. Nevertheless, fellow Freepers gotta admit, the news just got a lot more entertaining for all of us.
18 posted on
11/17/2006 8:42:27 AM PST by
Minn
To: Dane
The Demoncrats are fundamentally incapable of producing ... a galvanized agenda". That is a fact irrespective of "her ability to deliver a galvanized agenda"
By repeatedly declaring "we are unified" we know the opposite is true, and they are just trying to quiet dissent and analysis.
I think I'll refer to her as Speaker Pelousy.
21 posted on
11/17/2006 8:44:46 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: Dane
"The resurrected tape feasted upon by Pelosi enemies..."That's a laugh. For two weeks the MSM kept Foley on the front page for sending emails and IMs to a page. While the Foley thing was depicable, Murtha's considering bribes seems a matter of greater concern. IMO
22 posted on
11/17/2006 8:48:04 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Dane
LOL! hehehe....
NYT: Nancy..(Botox) Nancy, We hardly Knew Ya... please...don't c*@p-#ut n#w
hmmm, Holding your fiends closer...eh?
24 posted on
11/17/2006 8:48:43 AM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :^)
To: Dane
![](http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c2/Davis1950/PelosiEye.jpg)
"Don't worry, I'm keeping an eye on things!"
25 posted on
11/17/2006 8:51:31 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Dane
Ouch!
Even the NYT is tarnishing her!
30 posted on
11/17/2006 8:59:02 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Dane
We depict,.. You decide
![](http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c2/Davis1950/Dopey%20Democrats/MurthaAngry.jpg)
![](http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c2/Davis1950/Irey.jpg)
31 posted on
11/17/2006 8:59:47 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Dane
I wonder what DU has to say about this. I need to find the Dummie Funnies thread.
35 posted on
11/17/2006 9:04:24 AM PST by
diamond6
(Everyone who is for abortion has been born. Ronald Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson