Posted on 11/17/2006 12:03:43 AM PST by BurbankKarl
The UCLA student stunned with a Taser by a campus police officer has hired a high-profile civil rights lawyer who plans to file a brutality lawsuit.
The videotaped incident, which occurred after the student refused requests to show his ID card to campus officers, triggered widespread debate on and off campus Thursday about whether use of the Taser was warranted. It was the third in a recent series of local incidents captured on video that raise questions about arrest tactics.
Attorney Stephen Yagman said he plans to file a federal civil rights lawsuit accusing the UCLA police of "brutal excessive force," as well as false arrest. The lawyer also provided the first public account of the Tuesday night incident at UCLA's Powell Library from the student, Mostafa Tabatabainejad, a 23-year-old senior.
He said that Tabatabainejad, when asked for his ID after 11 p.m. Tuesday, declined because he thought he was being singled out because of his Middle Eastern appearance. Yagman said Tabatabainejad is of Iranian descent but is a U.S.-born resident of Los Angeles.
The lawyer said Tabatabainejad eventually decided to leave the library but when an officer refused the student's request to take his hand off him, the student fell limp to the floor, again to avoid participating in what he considered a case of racial profiling. After police started firing the Taser, Tabatabainejad tried to "get the beating, the use of brutal force, to stop by shouting and causing people to watch. Generally, police don't want to do their dirties in front of a lot of witnesses."
He said Tabatabainejad was hit by the Taser five times and suffered "moderate to severe contusions" on his right side.
UCLA officials declined to respond directly to Yagman's statements, saying they still were conducting their internal investigation of the incident.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
"The guy sounds like a faggot..."
You might not agree with his opinion (neither do I), but that comment was uncalled for.
Whoops!
After re reading the posts, I realized you were talking about the guy who was tazed!
Sorry!
Not enough coffee yet.
Oh, please--in other stories Voter photo ID is blocked by activist judges. Can one really have it both ways?
That explains it. You must be one of those "Bloomberg" republicans.
Yup.....and we taxpayers are paying for their meal ticket.
Lying on the floor (whether "peaceably" or not - I'd love to see an aggressive or hostile lying on the floor) when given a lawful command (unless the command was to lie down) would be resisting.
The wimpy student was no match for the several police officers.Do you think it's better when it's a "fair fight" and more people get hurt and get hurt more seriously? The idea of overwhelming force is to reduce harm.
... clearly this act of violence threatens us all.
The use of the word "clearly" does not turn an assertion into an argument.
I think it might help if you told your story. As a former LEO I see tasers as life-saving tools. They give more refinement to the "use of force" continuum. Without a taser, there is the use of pain-compliance techniques, like holds and pressure points, the use of the baton, which can also be fatal when used in the real world. The baton ideally is used on soft tissue -- like triceps, gluteus maximus, and quadriceps -- but when the baton is out, the citizen doesn't always hold still, so the baton can land in unintended places. Oh yeah, there's also the gun.
For better or for worse, in New York City or LA, if you do not comply with a lawful order, you take a chance. Even if the order is unlawful, regrettably, noncompliance is risky. It is prudent, circumstances permitting, to weight the consequences of noncompliance and assess whether the principle involved is worth the risk. I'm sure that sometimes it is, but I'm not sure that I would go to the mat over being asked to show my ID.
Yes there are some bad cops in LA. There are some bad people who aren't cops there too. The world is littered with bad folks.
Now, that's my attempt at a rebuttal to the charge of excessive force. Would you care to articulate what you think the police SHOULD have done?
Will you please tell me what the police officers should have done when the kid refused to show ID then told them to F-off?
He had already obviously defied campus security officers who had asked the police to take over.
I don't know why the kid couldn't have just shown the ID or got up and left, acknowledgeing he either forgot it or didn't have one.
I watched the video, the kid was begging for this situation for whatever personal reason. The Taser's they used were obviously not all that strong, as the kid was not disabled in any way. You could still hear his foul mouth spewing.
I guess the police should have said...'well, okay, since you don't want to leave...just stay'.
You gotta be kidding?
"I'd say the police officer was the provocateur the moment he put his hand on the person who appeared to have been leaving the premises on his own accord."
The kid refused to leave.
You cite an article which says they're planning an autopsy as evidence that shows that he was killed by a taser? Instead of an autopsy they should have called you? This is not reasonable.
It [the taser]should be used if at all as a last resort.
So FIRST we shoot them, THEN we can tase them? Oh, that's smart!
If every time there's a story about a cop, a bunch of folks come streaming out of the woodwork complaining about the coming police state, people will stop listening.
This is especially true is the complaints are vague, overstated, and irrelevant.
The guy disobeyed a legal order, reacted violently to a legal touch. He got tased. There is no brutality here, just good appropriate policing.
Another thing which gets in the way of your alarms being believed is that you and binnewhaatevershow no real understanding of policing. You try it, do some ride-alongs, realize that a badge is a good target for a bogey to aim at, live and deal with not knowing when a guy approaches you with a frown on his face whether he's going to ask for directions or pull a knife and attack you, with knowing that you don't know and that you may find out too late to prevent getting hurt or killed.
And as for biinejerk's "poor little police man - did he get his feelings hurt?" I am no longer a cop. If you want to say that to me face to face without hiding behind your computer, freepmail me, and I'll set up the meeting. Now that I'm no longer wearing a badge, I'll be happy to comp you some brutality as an amateur.
But to tell you the truth, I'd prefer to see you do what police do and then think about the nonsense you've been spouting.
Moral of story. Cops ask you for your ID, present it and keep your mouth shut. Screaming about the Patriot Act and going limp is not going to endear you to the police.
Well, actually he was tasered the first time prior to the beginning of the recording. But it certainly doesnt help to start screaming about the patriot act when all you have to do is present your ID and follow their instructions to leave.
Although I agree with pretty much everything in your thread I do not think it applies in this particular case.
You are mistaking my powerful and effective use of words for strong and bitter.
I must say though you are as good as they are on the left at taking words out of context to bend their meaning toward your bias.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.