Skip to comments.
A Question from a Webb Supporter
The Washington Post ^
| November 14, 2006
| John Whitesides
Posted on 11/14/2006 1:51:18 PM PST by DCBandita
The announcement by McCain, who has put together campaign organizations in many of the states with early nominating contests, was widely expected. The intentions of Giuliani, who has been less active in early organizing, had been less clear.
Giuliani's campaign team said the committee was simply an opening move designed to keep his options open, with a final decision still to come.
"This filing affords him the opportunity to raise money and put together an organization to assist him in making his decision," Giuliani adviser Anthony Carbonetti said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: conservatives; neocons; theocons; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 661-662 next last
To: concerned about politics
I had a "That's him?" reaction. It sounded like he'd swallowed a badger at first, then he was cognitive dissonance in motion.
I had expected someone more articulate.
Regards, Ivan
41
posted on
11/14/2006 2:07:03 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: DCBandita
Sounds like your pro-abortion stance is the only reason you are a Dem?
Or are there others?
To: DCBandita
You may find your answers over here.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1738502/posts
To: SJackson
I did. And to promote full disclosure, I was an active volunteer for the Webb campaign.
To: DCBandita
Hm... Well, "my" party just put a pro-gun Senator in the Capitol. As to their stand on immigration, I can't abide it but that doesn't mean I don't think some semblance of balance (legislative vs. executive) is a bad thing. LOL! He will march to harry Reid's tune.
Like Pt Barnum said there is s sucker born every minute and you are bearing out his adage to be true.
45
posted on
11/14/2006 2:07:29 PM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: DCBandita
Guliani would win in a national election if he survived the primaries. He is too liberal on social issues. Supporting gay marriage and abortion on demand makes him unpalatable to a lot of people not just the religious right. I am a moderately religious Hindu and both gay marriage and abortion are abhorrent to me and not because of my religion. Marriage is a building block of society and altering that definition leads to a road which ends in Scandinavia and we don't to be like them. Killing unborn babies is also murder and any compassionate person with a would would think that.
That being said, if Guliani does survive the primary I will vote for him because Hillary is liberal in every sense. On national security and crime issues, Rudy is very strong, on fiscal issues I don't know enough about him.
46
posted on
11/14/2006 2:08:00 PM PST
by
Maneesh
(A non-hyphenated American.)
To: DCBandita
""my" party just put a pro-gun Senator in the Capitol." No they didn't.
They put a "pro-sportsmen" Senator in.
Shame you didn't know any more about Webb than his Party.
But of course that was all you needed to know.
47
posted on
11/14/2006 2:08:05 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: DCBandita
The only problem I have with Guiliani is that he's pro-choice. However, if he seeks the GOP nomination, I think he'll become pro-life as that is the only way he'll get it.
An aside: what keeps you in the democrat party these days?
To: ConservativeTerrapin
I wish we wouldn't label as a ZOT! anyone who merely asks a provocative question. The poster isn't being disrespectful, merely openly explains that he's a moderate Dem asking a question we SHOULD be asking.
Or are we going to out-DU DU in their "tombstoning" of anyone not towing the party line?
49
posted on
11/14/2006 2:08:16 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Republican, atheist, pro-lifer, stranded in Blue Boston)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Why would he be zotted? Seems like a respectful reasonable guy to me.
50
posted on
11/14/2006 2:08:31 PM PST
by
DManA
To: theDentist
Straw man. Next you'll ask me if murder should be legislated. It's a losing argument on either side.
To: DCBandita
A moderate democrat? You should fit in here very nicely. They've all but taken over FreeRepublic, a Conservative site in name only.
52
posted on
11/14/2006 2:08:42 PM PST
by
Godebert
To: Prov3456; DCBandita
Good point Prov. What's wrong, DC, with the Right's religious figures speaking their mind, while the Left's figures get carte blanche?
53
posted on
11/14/2006 2:09:07 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: DCBandita
So you prefer not to answer?
54
posted on
11/14/2006 2:10:01 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: DManA
I agree. He just asked what "IBTZ" means.
55
posted on
11/14/2006 2:10:05 PM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
To: FJB2
Don't you think that a person can be pro-life or pro-choice without especially promoting an "agenda"? Look at how many pro-life Democrats there are... Their stance, however, is that they have personal pro-life beliefs and will not try to push the issue one way or the other legislatively.
To: ansel12
There is nothing moderate about being a member of the democrat party, why is a democrat troll even starting his own threads on FR?Because he/she/it can.
He/she/it could never get away with a reasonable discussion on a left wing site. He/she/it would have been beheaded by now.
To: DCBandita
I did. And to promote full disclosure, I was an active volunteer for the Webb campaign.You do realise that the presence of Webb and other Democrats makes it look like America doesn't want to fight the War on Terror any longer. You do also realise that this has given heart to America's enemies.
This is what is being portrayed here. Blair and the other British politicians and people who have stood with America are having to backtrack because now it looks like you're not so sure.
This election's results were a disgrace. Iran and Syria are laughing their arses off.
Ivan
58
posted on
11/14/2006 2:10:38 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: theDentist
Presumably he is against the Iraq effort if he campaigned for Webb.
To: DCBandita
Their stance, however, is that they have personal pro-life beliefs and will not try to push the issue one way or the other legislatively.Oh? Will they allow Roe versus Wade to be overturned and for the matter to be decided by the states (rather like gay marriage) as the Constitution provides?
I don't think so!
Ivan
60
posted on
11/14/2006 2:11:54 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 661-662 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson