Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hillary factor
New York Daily News ^ | November 11th, 2006 | KENNETH R. BAZINET, THOMAS M. DeFRANK and MICHAEL McAULIFF

Posted on 11/13/2006 12:32:50 AM PST by Cincinna

Will Hillary run? That depends on a bigger question: Can she win? In the next month, New York's junior senator will embark on the most monumental, emotional gut-check of her life - and weigh whether she thinks she can win the White House.

Then, not too far into 2007, she will make her intentions known.

"She has to wait until she's made a decision and it's a decision she's comfortable with," said Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf, who supports Clinton.

Getting comfortable could be hard, and some of her closest political allies hope she resists the urge. But a lot has been going her way lately.

Democrats proved last week they can win in red states, taking Senate seats, House seats and governor's mansions. Would-be Hillary slayer Mark Warner, Virginia's former governor, has dropped out of 2008 contention, and 2004 nominee John Kerry shot himself in the foot with a flubbed joke.

Poll numbers on matchups with top GOP rivals John McCain and Rudy Giuliani have improved to statistical ties or slight leads for her.

A Newsweek poll released yesterday found 53% of those surveyed said there's a chance they'd vote for her - virtually identical to McCain and Giuliani. And while many Americans see her as a polarizing figure, the key issue of whether they think she can win is trending up. A recent Gallup poll found 57% of Democrats say she could win it all.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2for1; arkansasgrifters; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: IrishBrigade

tell that to all the people that pay money for tickets to be on the view....

I wouldn't go there if it was free....


41 posted on 11/13/2006 7:01:41 AM PST by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1737741/posts

Here is what I am talking about....


42 posted on 11/13/2006 7:03:33 AM PST by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: slaymakerpowertape

JFK Jr was an accomplished pilot, business man, and beloved in NY. If he put his hat in the ring, Hillary wouldn't stand a chance.


43 posted on 11/13/2006 8:06:51 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: slaymakerpowertape; xtinct; Cobra64; des; mariabush; Dahoser; gridlock
posted earlier... but incase someone missed it
--

get some popcorn, sit back, and make sure the tin foil is snug... I'm gonna spin a tale...(try to not skip ahead)

The date, sometime before summer 1998. Imagine you are politically hyper-active, power hungry, and love the life style afforded the highest office in the land. You realize it will all end in 2.5 years, at which point you will be pushed to the side. This just won't do. You are HRClinton, what's your next step?

You have all your friends in the media begging you to run, but you have never held office, any office, at any level. You aren't stupid and know you'd never make it. Therefore, you will have to hold some high level office in 2000. So that rules out running for POTUS in 2000. 2004 would also be out since you'd only be a freshman. You know you'll have to serve one successful term without controversy and without pissing off too many people.

This leaves you with 2008 and 2012. 2012 would be out since you'd be getting even longer in the tooth and the shine would be too far off the apple (being as nice as possible here) to sell. Therefore, 2008 it is.

No problem. If a democrat wins in 2000, he'd run again in 2004. If he wins in 2004, his running mate would be tossed to the 2nd seat again in 2008, if you put your hat in the ring. If he loses in 2004, you're set for an uncontested shot at 2008 top slot.

Only a democrat loss in 2000 causes problems, because you'd have to insure a democrat loss in 2004. This could be accomplished after the DNC in July 2004 by reduced or unflattering news coverage. Potentially leaking of damaging information (which you have, of course) would also insure a democrat loss in 2004.

So... you have it all set. You figure it's a no brainer. You only have to pick the type of high level office you want. This leaves governor, senate, or congress. Congress doesn't yield enough power. Governor's do a lot of work, and run the higher risk of pissing people off. That leaves the Senate. Powerful, low risk, most people don't even know their senators. Therefore, senator clinton it is. Next question, which state? Has to be a big, powerful state with the possibility of getting in. The 4 most powerful states would be (in no particular order): Texas, California, New York, and Florida. Texas and Florida are off the ticket right away. California is unlikely, and that leaves New York. No problem.

So the only thing you need to do is buy a house in New York.

Then the unthinkable. Someone has the gaul to actually suggest they want to run for the same seat! YOUR seat! This person can't just be dismissed, unlike the others. This one is a democrat! And he's well respected by democrats AND republicans! Whoa! This isn't good. He's well liked by all demographics. He has actually had a successful business in New York and the people genuinely like him. Worse still, the media loves him... they swoon all over him!

This cannot be allowed to stop *US*, the co-presidents! How dare he?!

The question: You're HRClinton, what do you do?

Yes, we have all heard the term 'arkan-cide'.. and you've deflected all the stories in the passed, what's one more? This guy even flies a personal airplane (what was he thinking?!). No problem.

Question: Who do you think that 'pretender' was?

 

      JFK Jr.

 

  Remember, they were found, all three of them, still in the plane. None of them even tried to unbuckle their belts. My guess, something in their drinks to help them sleep. Don't forget... they were also given a 'burial at sea'. Nah... no cover up here.

The outrage or shock you may be feeling is due to the subconscious realization of just how well that all fits.

You are not alone. I have seen people jump up from a table upon hearing the name. Shock and disbelief in their eyes... from it 'clicking' into place.

44 posted on 11/13/2006 8:18:32 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: slaymakerpowertape

Also, in JFK, Jr's magazine, he had just run an unflattering article about hillary.


45 posted on 11/13/2006 8:23:07 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bannie
Also, in JFK Jr's magazine, he had just run an unflattering article about hillary.

I did not know that. Hmmm. check my post #44. that tidbit adds more to the thought...

46 posted on 11/13/2006 8:28:16 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sten
Hey, I've theorized about that conspiracy all along. I also believe that they "encouraged" Sonny Bono's run into a tree because he was to be on the "jury" at billyblythe's impeachment trial.

Yup, I'm a consipracy theorist.
47 posted on 11/13/2006 8:34:42 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
Now what will be interesting to watch, is what happens to Missus Pelosi when Missus Clinton finally figures out what is going on...

You are right!

48 posted on 11/13/2006 11:04:53 AM PST by syriacus (Millions in South Korea are free because 30,000 US troops DIED in 3 years under TRUMAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sten
after all, it was his death that cleared the way for her.

How's that?

49 posted on 11/13/2006 11:09:35 AM PST by Jim Noble (To preserve the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

"I doubt that Hillary could lead the military...or the nation for that matter."

Well, you can bet the farm that she will be leading it with one less soldier and one less Marine. (read my tagline)


50 posted on 11/13/2006 11:09:52 AM PST by SAMS ("I may look harmless, but I raised a U.S. MARINE!" Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: slaymakerpowertape
Was Clinton accomplishing nothing to 'keep the seat warm' for Gore?

I think do-nothing Clinton was afraid to "rock the boat" (eg, fight terrorists) for fear Hillary would not be able to run as president, if he made some major blunder.

Never again should we elect a president whose wife has made known her intention to run for the presidency.

Such a president will think of his wife's future first and his country's future second.

51 posted on 11/13/2006 11:13:38 AM PST by syriacus (Millions in South Korea are free because 30,000 US troops DIED in 3 years under TRUMAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sten
JFK Jr was an accomplished pilot, business man, and beloved in NY

He was a recent student pilot, and obviously not very good. He had no track record in business whatsoever. And he was only "beloved" by sicko Kennedy worshippers.

52 posted on 11/13/2006 11:14:12 AM PST by Jim Noble (To preserve the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

My remark was one of sarcasm. She will run despite the fact that she promised NY she would not. Hence the barf animation.


53 posted on 11/13/2006 11:42:37 AM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Rosie is a problem.


54 posted on 11/13/2006 1:56:59 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

I went to get the paper yesterday and who was on the cover of New York Magazine, Hillary! With the headline saying something like the election for 2008 begins.

I thought in my head, no the cheerleading for 2008 begins.


55 posted on 11/13/2006 1:59:42 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

You're right about that. W's DUI hurt him among Republicans, not RATS. Same with Foley. Sometimes it's a bit too high a standard.


56 posted on 11/13/2006 2:51:55 PM PST by Dahoser (It's going to be a long and miserable two years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MrRights
"Step ONE for all of us... Next year, register as a Democrat, then vote for anyone-but-hillary in the Primaries."

Actually I think we should do the opposite - I don't think she has a chance of winning the general election - unless McCain runs independent as a spoiler.

57 posted on 11/13/2006 3:14:32 PM PST by bluetone006 (Peace - or I guess war if given no other option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sten

How much earlier? I seem to remember a post like this, but it was a few years back.


58 posted on 11/13/2006 3:20:52 PM PST by Dahoser (It's going to be a long and miserable two years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: slaymakerpowertape

Willy Clinton shouldn't have abused the power of his office to seduce a barely out of her teens worker in that office to perform "lazy one-sided sex" on his fat self. How many others were there? Monica evidently was forewarned to bring her Presidential Kneepads.

You see, there was to be a "Clinton Dynasty", with Bill having 8 yrs., and then puppet Gore having 8 yrs. and then Hillary having 8 yrs., then who?, Chelsea? . . ironically, SHE may just be the most capable one of the bunch. It didn't work out, as the Lord chose that Willy's numerous puerile sexual escapades got shouted from the housetops just like Christ once mentioned. I always had thought
Christ was talking about the "shouting from the housetops" coming after death, but in Clinton's case, he got the shouting going on the roofs while he was still in this mortal coil. Mia T. has it right. The Clintons have lumbered roughshod over too many little people for it to be silenced.

*See tagline.


59 posted on 11/13/2006 4:48:11 PM PST by Twinkie (GET BUSY, NANCY . . AL QAEDA IS EXPECTING A LOT FROM YOU!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sten

JFK Jr was popular in the way that a movie star or a prince is popular, because of his parentage and because he was very charming and extraordinarily handsome. However, I wouldn't say that he was respected. All he did was run a stupid magazine. He failed the bar exam twice. His wife was known around town as "difficult" (i.e., a crazy bitch) and possibly a drug addict with an eating disorder. At the time, it seemed that he was happy doing what he was doing. So he didn't have the resume to be a senator and moreover, there's no reason to think that he actually wanted to be one or was making a run for office. Anyway, pilot error - i.e. stupidity - is much more consistent with the rest of the facts than murder by a power-hungry Hillary Clinton. Why would she take such a risk? If anyone found out, she'd get lynched.


60 posted on 11/13/2006 9:19:14 PM PST by slaymakerpowertape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson