Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2006 5:21:27 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; Salvation; NYer; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg; OrthodoxPresbyterian; ...
The church stressed that it was not saying some lives were not worth living, but said there were "strong proportionate reasons" for "overriding the presupposition that life should be maintained".

The bishop's submission continued: "There may be occasions where, for a Christian, compassion will override the 'rule' that life should inevitably be preserved.

"Disproportionate treatment for the sake of prolonging life is an example of this.

The church said it would support the potentially fatal withdrawal of treatment only if all alternatives had been considered, "so that the possibly lethal act would only be performed with manifest reluctance."

2 posted on 11/12/2006 5:22:50 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

So God's Will and His Greater Plan be damned, is that it?


3 posted on 11/12/2006 5:23:16 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Being on that side of the pond, what's your take on this?


7 posted on 11/12/2006 5:26:12 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I wonder how these church leaders are going to explain this on Judgment Day?


8 posted on 11/12/2006 5:26:15 PM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

How soon before the church starts performing abortions?


10 posted on 11/12/2006 5:27:46 PM PST by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
So, as society, we are back to Sparta in ancient Greece, where the infirm elderly, the sick, the disabled, the babies no one wants, are brought to a hillside and left to die. Abortion and euthanasia are the precursors of these travesties and they are already upon us here in the United States.
May God have mercy!!!
11 posted on 11/12/2006 5:28:53 PM PST by vox_freedom (Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
You've got to be cruel to be kind. Sometimes, love hurts. This is going to hurt me more than it hurts you. Charity, Christian love, (Caritas), demands that we do not help you.

So, now at least we can fix a price on human life. Let's start the bidding at 10 pounds.... do I hear 20?

12 posted on 11/12/2006 5:29:08 PM PST by PatrickF4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

"The church stressed that it was not saying some lives were not worth living, but said there were "strong proportionate reasons" for "overriding the presupposition that life should be maintained". "

-The Church of Nazism


13 posted on 11/12/2006 5:29:20 PM PST by Vinny (You can't compromise with evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
the high financial cost of keeping desperately ill babies alive should be a factor in life or death decisions.

Their concept is that the human costs too much so they must be destroyed. What's the view on capital punishment for murderers over there? If you want to be homicidal why stop with babies. That bishop is probably ugly as hell and should be terminated as well.
14 posted on 11/12/2006 5:29:25 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Hmmm... I was was just readinfthe other day how when the Nazi's came to power, they starting killing the useless eaters, elderly, disable and deformed children, etc. etc.

Evil is as evil does. What don't this freaking idiots understand about that?

15 posted on 11/12/2006 5:29:35 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If we lose the value that human life has both sanctity and dignity and that only God can play God, I think we are finished.


16 posted on 11/12/2006 5:29:36 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The church stressed that it was not saying some lives were not worth living, but said there were "strong proportionate reasons" for "overriding the presupposition that life should be maintained".

WTF is a 'strong proportionate reason'? O_o


17 posted on 11/12/2006 5:30:15 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
The Church Of England is post-Christian. The Cross has been emptied in England of both spiritual and ethical import.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

19 posted on 11/12/2006 5:31:57 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Does "sick newborn babies" include those who have a genetic tendency to become liberals or Islamic death cult members?


21 posted on 11/12/2006 5:32:18 PM PST by Screamname (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Government is now capitalized but God is not. That is the message between the lines. It is now considered quaint and old fashioned to defend life. The government is accepted by all to be the final arbiter in this decision.

The secularists will eventually win all disputes because government gives ordinary citizens benefits and laws while God just promises eternal life. Benefits and laws are tangible while religious mores, morals and promises are intangible. The "golden calf" remains an object of worship only it is not called that.


23 posted on 11/12/2006 5:32:51 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Maybe I'm just reading this wrong but it almost sounds to me like they're saying that there are times that using every available method to extend life is not always the best decision. Sometimes it is better to let nature take its course.

I know if I had a child who was born with some type of defect that was going to kill them very quickly, I would not want that child to be hooked up to every machine possible to keep him/her alive for a few days or weeks. I would put it into God's hands and trust him to do what he knows is best. If the child dies, then they would be in heaven. If God decided to heal the child, then I would be grateful beyond words.

That said, I would not advocate killing a child because they're blind, deaf, missing an arm or leg, or something along those lines. That would be murder.

25 posted on 11/12/2006 5:32:57 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Just one day without polls would be nice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I would like for him to imagine Jesus, Himself standing right next to him, and then saying that out loud!


26 posted on 11/12/2006 5:33:02 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; pryncessraych; aroostook war; TheRake; rogator; kellynla; redgirlinabluestate; ...

+

If you want on (or off) this Catholic and Pro-Life ping list, let me know!



30 posted on 11/12/2006 5:36:32 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says ? lex injusta non obligat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; sionnsar; Coleus; wagglebee

OMG, a terrible developement in the Anglican Church.


32 posted on 11/12/2006 5:36:58 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!|What if I lecture Americans about America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The Times of London's article was vague about the authority of this submission, making it appear that this bishop might have written it on his own hook. But this article makes it appear that the bishop's submission has considerable authority as being the Church of England's position.

Utterly damnable.


34 posted on 11/12/2006 5:38:32 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson