To: xzins
the high financial cost of keeping desperately ill babies alive should be a factor in life or death decisions.
Their concept is that the human costs too much so they must be destroyed. What's the view on capital punishment for murderers over there? If you want to be homicidal why stop with babies. That bishop is probably ugly as hell and should be terminated as well.
14 posted on
11/12/2006 5:29:25 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
These fine gentlemen of the church who are so overwrought regarding the pain and suffering of the wee babes should probably be guided on to a different level of existence themselves ~ and as soon as possible.
The rest of us may then struggle on as best we can unhindered with their anguished cries.
29 posted on
11/12/2006 5:35:10 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: kinoxi
"...the high financial cost of keeping desperately ill babies alive should be a factor in life or death decisions."
This is the logical end point of socialized medicine. If the state is paying to keep you alive, the state gets to decide if you are worthy of life. This is why we cannot let HillaryCare take hold here.
To: kinoxi
the high financial cost of keeping desperately ill babies alive should be a factor in life or death decisions. Now take one more step....heart patients....then another,....diabetics....then another,....surgical patients over 58 years old....then... then.... then....the Rhinelands eutopia.
To: kinoxi
Capital punishment is a no no over there last I checked in 1994.
63 posted on
11/12/2006 6:27:23 PM PST by
ROTB
(Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Q. Adams, October 11, 1798)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson