1 posted on
11/12/2006 8:01:50 AM PST by
rhema
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: merry10
2 posted on
11/12/2006 8:04:38 AM PST by
merry10
To: rhema
Thank you for the post.
Many forget that after Iraq was invaded under the watchful eye of the embedded media, Rummy was considered a rockstar, and some wanted him to be considered for the Presidency.
Rummy's only crime was to be the smartest guy in the room.
3 posted on
11/12/2006 8:06:17 AM PST by
Pukin Dog
(Being a Liberal is just a coping mechanism for low self esteem and/or bad parenting.)
To: rhema
Don Rumsfeld goes the bum's rush because he sought to transform the U.S military into a post-Cold War institution. Actually a small force did a magnificient in Iraq. We accomplished in three weeks of the war with a force less than a third the size we deployed in Desert Storm. The Democrats opposed that war too just like they opposed Operation Iraqi Freedom. The war's aftermath is not Rumsfeld's fault. We had to strike a balance between doing too much and doing too little. None of Rumsfeld's critics have ever stated how they would have done things there differently. I think in retrospect, Rumsfeld fell because he was just too honest. Its not a quality that commands much respect in contemporary Washington.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
4 posted on
11/12/2006 8:10:37 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
bttt
5 posted on
11/12/2006 8:12:51 AM PST by
clyde asbury
(It's too late to lose the weight you used to need to throw around.)
To: rhema
The Donald Rumsfeld I know isn't the one you knowAll this crap about Rumsfeld "not listening to his Generals" is BS. Rumsfeld is a very intelligent man doing what he thinks is right. It's his job. What the press means is that he doesn't succumb to the opinions of some of the Generals who think like liberals do. That is my opinion. Rumsfeld is like Bolton. mischaracterized and disrespected for doing his job.
To: rhema
History will remember him well, long after we've forgotten his poll driven critics. He seems to be a lot like Churchill in that he did what needed to be done and then was discarded when the politics of the moment changed.
7 posted on
11/12/2006 8:14:49 AM PST by
GBA
(God Bless America!)
To: rhema
Something I recall George Will saying when Don Rumsfeld became Sec. Def. (I paraphrase) Don Rumsfeld is Washington's worst nightmare, a 70 year old rich man who's not looking for the next job.
He will be missed, but I've a sneaking suspection that we've not heard the last of Rummy.
9 posted on
11/12/2006 8:18:32 AM PST by
Valin
(Rick Santorum 08)
To: rhema
This is a great article from someone who knew the great man..I think the whole country should read this..what an amazing man..
11 posted on
11/12/2006 8:22:47 AM PST by
Beth528
To: rhema
Superb article. Thanks for sharing it.
Rumsfeld's fierce intelligence and intellectual honesty could be seen right away during his "rock star" press briefings for the war in Afghanistan.
The only reason he was trashed by the press was because he was right, everyone knew he was right, and as a credit to our military and our nation, this man was a very real threat to liberalism.
Can you imagine having him as a dad or uncle? How great would THAT be?!
12 posted on
11/12/2006 8:22:53 AM PST by
Silly
(still being silly)
To: rhema
The best and brightest leaders in government are always beat on and driven out. It seems they (the best) make the majority of incompetents look even more incompetent.
The State dept. for example is nothing buy rotting OLD wood. S.D. has probably not had a new idea since 1901 and would die of heart failure if someone suggested another course like "tell it like it is"!
13 posted on
11/12/2006 8:23:19 AM PST by
Tannerone
(FEED ALL TERRORIST LIVE AND OTHERWISE TO STARVED HOGS)
To: rhema
I have finished reading "Cobra II". It does not paint a favorable picture. However, its omissions are quite apparent.
The Zinni plan, later put forward (not pushed) by Shinsheki was for over 400,000. No mention of post-Iraq appears. No mention of securing the countless WMD sites appear. No mention of sectarian violence and revenge killings appear.
Just 400,000 to overrun Iraq. Why? WMD. How many were they forecasting to die? I don't recall them reporting but I would guess 10-15% or between 40,000-60,000. Then one needs the cemetary troops and logistics to evacuate the wounded and dead. And, they still need the logistics to prosecute the conflict.
Rumsfeld did it with a lot less. And there were the same oversights WRT aftermath as at any previous sanctimonious time. Cobra II points out that Rumsfeld and Franks overlooked the Saddam Fedayeen, who turned out to be the most tenacious fighters (according to the book).
Until we overthrew Baghdad, no one could know how the various factions would react. Many would have thought the regulars would have dispensed with the Foreign fighters.
And of course, Bremer, by disbanding all units and officials did not help matters. If any blemish is to be found on Rumsfeld record, it would be the Bremer authority (imo - I thought Bremer was a Colin Powell plant).
17 posted on
11/12/2006 8:38:27 AM PST by
Prost1
(Fair and Unbiased as always!)
To: rhema
Only thing Rummy missed is that ANY democrat military officer is a security risk..
If they had any sense they wouldn't even be a democrat...
18 posted on
11/12/2006 8:41:40 AM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperboles)
To: rhema
This is a great article. The writer presents the Donald Rumsfeld I saw on the News, and the Donald Rumsfeld I hoped was working for our country. It's good to know that my perception of Donald Rumsfeld was right. He is a good man.
19 posted on
11/12/2006 8:49:01 AM PST by
bd476
To: rhema
[...December 2002, Haynes, brought Rumsfeld news that (snip) questioned the legality of the additional (interrogation) techniques. Rumsfeld (snip) in short order directed Haynes to revoke the authority for the new techniques. ... the cruel and sexually bizarre behavior at Abu Ghraib occurred many months later...]
The media will ignore this.
Great Post!
20 posted on
11/12/2006 8:50:19 AM PST by
Jo Nuvark
(Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
To: rhema
No wonder the dems are afraid of him. He is natural leader and thinker.
To: rhema
You are soooooooo right "rhema"!!
But for me, all I did was listen to him via the TV...he makes sinse, is clearly in possession of a good mind, and is "...a gentleman and a scholar..."...articulate...wise...the list goes on and on. I think so many people have lost the ability to think for THEMSELVES. It is hard NOT to see what a great man he is.
Thanks!!!
Nancee
24 posted on
11/12/2006 8:57:15 AM PST by
Nancee
To: rhema
Very well written. Nice summary. And this is the view I always had of Rummy.
To: rhema
26 posted on
11/12/2006 8:59:42 AM PST by
ADemocratNoMore
(Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
To: rhema
I agree that Rumsfelds departure is a sad event but in politics 5 years is a lifetime ....we should rejoice he was able to accomplish what he did
27 posted on
11/12/2006 8:59:52 AM PST by
woofie
(If not this war then which one?)
To: rhema
the Rumsfeld caricature
Interesting tactic of the left. They create a caricature of someone, react to that caricature as though it were the real person, and before long, most Americans believe the caricature more than their own eyes and ears. In the MSM, and probably to most Americans, President Bush IS the caricature created by the left.
28 posted on
11/12/2006 9:00:26 AM PST by
ChocChipCookie
(Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson