Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2006 6:06:36 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 11/12/2006 6:07:22 AM PST by NYer (Apart from the cross, there is no other ladder by which we may get to Heaven. St. Rose of Lima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Huber; sionnsar

Ping!


3 posted on 11/12/2006 6:08:22 AM PST by NYer (Apart from the cross, there is no other ladder by which we may get to Heaven. St. Rose of Lima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org; scripter

Slippery slope alert!


4 posted on 11/12/2006 6:09:01 AM PST by NYer (Apart from the cross, there is no other ladder by which we may get to Heaven. St. Rose of Lima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

The church has eloquently stated its non-position.

The Equivocation award goes to the Bishop.


7 posted on 11/12/2006 6:15:27 AM PST by claptrap (optional tag-line under reconsideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

If they now endorse abortion, how does the Church feel about Sharia Law?

LLS


8 posted on 11/12/2006 6:19:05 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The Church of England believes doctors should be given the right to withhold treatment from some seriously disabled newborn babies in exceptional circumstances, The Observer reported.

Like if they had an ugly mother? Who determines what this horrible disability is?

9 posted on 11/12/2006 6:24:08 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The Church of England believes doctors should be given the right to withhold treatment from some seriously disabled newborn babies in exceptional circumstances, The Observer reported.
Wow!
I'm shocked --- I never knew Josef Mengele had children.

Oh well, ya learn something knew everyday.

10 posted on 11/12/2006 6:24:42 AM PST by Condor51 ("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
This is a very tangled issue. I am a militantly pro life doctor. I see babies delivered now at 23 weeks gestational age, often due to cocaine use by the mother. The normal "term" pregnancy is 40 weeks. many of these babies have life threatening abnormalities. They all have severely underdeveloped organs and have little chance of survival. Many are kept alive for months in intensive care and some who do survive are institutionalized for life. I believe that every life is priceless. However, the cost of this care is ENORMOUS. Of course the mother has no insurance. We believe in lower taxes right? We oppose socialized medicine right? What do we do?

I say we care for them. But believe me, this is a big problem.
13 posted on 11/12/2006 6:27:07 AM PST by outofstyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The Bishop of Southwark, Tom Butler, was said to have written that "it may in some circumstances be right to choose to withhold or withdraw treatment, knowing it will possibly, probably, or even certainly result in death".

How much longer before simply tossing a newborn in the garbage is considered an acceptable form of abortion? After all, no baby is capable of sustaining its own life, and mere inaction is enough to result in the infant's death.

15 posted on 11/12/2006 6:29:37 AM PST by cf_river_rat (Just another defender of the faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1737110/posts


16 posted on 11/12/2006 6:29:51 AM PST by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

If the Anglicans had half a brain, they would be in Rome on their knees begging the Pope to take them back. "Bless me father for I have sinned...."


17 posted on 11/12/2006 6:31:04 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Sounds like they wish to worship at the alter of Satan.


27 posted on 11/12/2006 6:52:34 AM PST by big'ol_freeper (It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Is this from the church adopted by Henry VIII, murderer and divorcer of inconvenient wives?

Not much of a surprise that the logical extension of abortion-on-demand is coming within grasp: the value of life is in the convenience of the beholder.
30 posted on 11/12/2006 7:00:07 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Is it any wonder Thomas Jefferson loathed the Anglican hierarchy.


34 posted on 11/12/2006 7:04:47 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

When did the Anglicans ordain NAZIs?


36 posted on 11/12/2006 7:09:50 AM PST by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The Church Of England has been taken over by pagans. Its Christian ethic is gone - snuffed out like the flame of a candle.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

42 posted on 11/12/2006 7:25:23 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

This is dangerous. It will lead to the Power of the State to make the determination.


43 posted on 11/12/2006 7:29:34 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Couple of observations:

These things used to be handled in quiet conversations between the family and the doctor. No more. Now the Anglican church wants such extremely delicate matters brought out into the open. It isn't enough that you or I grant other people the freedom to make decisions we might not agree with within the context of their own family - decisions we consider ourselves fortunate not to have to face. As long as they remain private they are between you and God - and He is distressingly silent on questions of social justice, progressive taxation, globalization, the war in Iraq and so on. No, God isn't much help these days. So it must no longer be a matter between you and God, it must become a matter between you and the medical profession and/or the state. God is thus removed from the question.

People, particularly young people, crave absolutes. If they don't find them in the Anglican church - and there's no question of that happening any more - they will look for them elsewhere. Such as in shari'a.

45 posted on 11/12/2006 7:32:32 AM PST by redbaiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
This is a tougher issue than a lot of folks on here want to make it. I'm not even sure of what to make of it and I am militantly anti-abortion. In some cases where the child is in horrible pain and will never be able to escape the pain or function I don't know if it isn't more compassionate to end what we know to be hopeless treatment. Certainly we often times will remove older patients from life support if their cases are without great hope and they are in great pain. Whats the difference?
47 posted on 11/12/2006 7:34:06 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

I'm just floored.


53 posted on 11/12/2006 8:15:36 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson