Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpforlife.org; scripter

Slippery slope alert!


4 posted on 11/12/2006 6:09:01 AM PST by NYer (Apart from the cross, there is no other ladder by which we may get to Heaven. St. Rose of Lima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NYer

Not anymore ~ they reached the bottom.


5 posted on 11/12/2006 6:11:49 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
compassion will override the 'rule' that life should inevitably be preserved

Ah, "compassion." That was one of the arguments for abortion, as I recall, from the 1960s. I was living in New York at the time, and all sorts of flakes from liberal Protestant churches used to float up with petitions based on the "compassionate" need to permit abortion. And guess what - the pitch worked, and they won.

6 posted on 11/12/2006 6:13:27 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; outofstyle; Lunatic Fringe
Here I go where angels fear to tread....

Catechism of the Catholic Church
Euthanasia

2276 Those whose lives are diminished or weakened deserve special respect. Sick or handicapped persons should be helped to lead lives as normal as possible.

2277 Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable.

Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.

2278 Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitimate; it is the refusal of "over-zealous" treatment. Here one does not will to cause death; one's inability to impede it is merely accepted. The decisions should be made by the patient if he is competent and able or, if not, by those legally entitled to act for the patient, whose reasonable will and legitimate interests must always be respected.

2279 Even if death is thought imminent, the ordinary care owed to a sick person cannot be legitimately interrupted. The use of painkillers to alleviate the sufferings of the dying, even at the risk of shortening their days, can be morally in conformity with human dignity if death is not willed as either an end or a means, but only foreseen and tolerated as inevitable Palliative care is a special form of disinterested charity. As such it should be encouraged.

==================================================
My snippy comments: The main problem with this issue is where is the line and who draws it? Of course it's much easier when it is a 64 year old man trying to decide how much treatment he wants while struggling with emphysema, adenocarcinoma and congestive heart failure or a 42 year old mother who is ravaged and tired of suffering and barely holding on just so she can see her youngest child make it to high school.

25 posted on 11/12/2006 6:48:15 AM PST by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Is it any surprise their bishops are either homos, lesbians or nonbelievers?


68 posted on 11/12/2006 10:56:03 AM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson