Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: screw boll
42 posted on
11/11/2006 7:33:15 PM PST by
angcat
("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
To: screw boll
So I guess a third term is out of the question, huh?
Ain't that just like a bunch of Commie "media" 'RATS. As if winning the election wasn't enough, they still feel the need to continue kicking the President in the head. Screw the lowlife, Commie bass turds.
44 posted on
11/11/2006 7:33:31 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Screw the election! I'm STILL going to support my president, my country and the troops!)
To: screw boll
I hear Pelosi's approval is not much better, around 35 %
To: screw boll
Looks like he will lose re-election in '08.
To: screw boll
Bush is going down in the polls... Is he on the ballot still?
To: screw boll
51 posted on
11/11/2006 7:38:23 PM PST by
cajungirl
(no)
To: screw boll
He is going to have a hard time getting elected in 2008.
54 posted on
11/11/2006 7:38:54 PM PST by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: screw boll; All
RONALD REAGAN AND HIS '6th YEAR' DEFEAT IN 1986
In 1986, Ronald Reagan and the GOP suffered HORRIBLE electoral losses:
8 SENATE SEATS
Moving the GOP from the majority (53-47 +6) to the minority (55-45 -10) . . . [At worst, GWB will face a 49-51 (-2) minority -- and that -2 will include a very GWB-leaning Independent!!]
5 CONGRESSIONAL SEATS
Giving the Democrats an even wider margin in the House
from a 253-182 (+71) majority to a 258-177 (+81) majority! . . . [It appears that GWB/the GOP will endure a much smaller (+30ishD) majority!]
Why did Reagan suffer such devastating losses in 1986?
Like President Bush, he just wasn't able to avoid the '6th' year hex! First there was Bork, then Reykjavik, then the election losses, then Iran-Contra, and then an historic 23-POINT DROP IN HIS JA RATING in just one month -- AND GUESS WHAT: THE UBER CONSERVATIVES DESERTED HIM IN DROVES [FYI: These are the same uber conservatives who today use a bastardized version of the Reagan legacy as a weapon with which to bash President Bush -- what a bunch of soul-less losers!] . . .
I'm off to watch the re-broadcast (C-Span) of today's Veterans Day Ceremony -- just in case you're wondering, the vets gave President Bush an ENTHUSIASTIC AND SUSTAINED STANDING OVATION both before and after his speech!
60 posted on
11/11/2006 7:42:41 PM PST by
DrDeb
To: screw boll
His ratings went down big time on Wednesday with us!
61 posted on
11/11/2006 7:43:38 PM PST by
MadelineZapeezda
(Madeline Albright ZaPeezda, no doubt about it!)
To: screw boll
I'm a 31%er!
65 posted on
11/11/2006 7:44:53 PM PST by
Bosco
(Remember how you felt on September 11?)
To: screw boll
31%?
it's really that high?
66 posted on
11/11/2006 7:45:21 PM PST by
eeevil conservative
(Dems win....Republicans blame conservatives? That will help..Keep attacking your base...BRILLIANT!)
To: screw boll
Wow, with only 31% popularity rate, it seems unlikely that he'll win the next Presidential election.
Heck, I bet he won't even run.
67 posted on
11/11/2006 7:45:25 PM PST by
dman4384
To: screw boll
This will never stop. To hell with their stacked polls.
80 posted on
11/11/2006 7:59:54 PM PST by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: screw boll
Bush Down In Polls: Only 31% Approve
With those kind of numbers I don't see how he can get reelected.
81 posted on
11/11/2006 8:01:22 PM PST by
Valin
(Rick Santorum 08)
To: screw boll
90 posted on
11/11/2006 8:10:25 PM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: screw boll
Bush's approval rating is important. In the case of Nixon, the left spent months driving his ratings down, so that they could get congressional support for impeachment.
The Democrats will not attempt impeachment if his ratings are too high- the backlash could hurt them.
But once he gets below a certain number, impeachment becomes a viable option.
"It's Bush's Fault" was not a joke on Fr, it was a campaign tactic.
98 posted on
11/11/2006 8:25:21 PM PST by
DBrow
To: screw boll
Bush's bailing on house conservatives is now catching up with him. His failure to preserve men like Tom DeLay and the recent electoral debacle of stay home conservatives has created a lame duck presidency that nust jump through democrate hoops just to survive.
I hope Dubyah dights them tooth and nail. He needs DeLay on his staff,post haste.
100 posted on
11/11/2006 8:32:10 PM PST by
Candor7
(Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
To: screw boll
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: BUSHSFAULT; BUSHSUCKS; IBTZ; IMPEACHBUSH; LEARNTOREADPOLLS; LESRNTOREADPOLLS; NEWSWEAK; NOMOREBUSHES; RATINGTOOHIGH; SHORTTIMER; TROLL; ZOT; ZOTMESOMETIMESOON
LOL
I support Bush. I have since the start on the war against Islamic Excremists. I will continue as long as he keeps up the good work on that front and I believe he has and will. It was actually because of Bush that I voted straight ticket Republican for the first time in my life. I did vote for Reagan my first presidental election, but even then it wasn't Republican across the board.
104 posted on
11/11/2006 8:58:22 PM PST by
YdontUleaveLibs
(Reason is out to lunch. How may I help you?)
To: screw boll
Newsweak...lemme guess- they spotted him flushing korans down the potty???
105 posted on
11/11/2006 8:59:29 PM PST by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: screw boll
He down because amnesty is back on the table.
113 posted on
11/12/2006 2:37:33 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(The snake is loose in the garden and Eve just bit the apple.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson