Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Down In Polls: Only 31% Approve
NewsWeek ^ | Non

Posted on 11/11/2006 7:06:57 PM PST by screw boll

Bush is going down in the polls...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushsfault; bushsucks; ibtz; impeachbush; learntoreadpolls; lesrntoreadpolls; newsweak; nomorebushes; ratingtoohigh; shorttimer; troll; zot; zotmesometimesoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: screw boll

His ratings went down big time on Wednesday with us!


61 posted on 11/11/2006 7:43:38 PM PST by MadelineZapeezda (Madeline Albright ZaPeezda, no doubt about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SnarlinCubBear

I have been very supportive of Bush, but his handling if Rumsfeld has really shaken my faith in him.

He flat out lied about keeping Rumsfeld. I find that hard to accept.

I no longer trust him to deal properly with Iraq. I hope he does, but he seems to be a different person at this point. His courting of the Dems is sickening.

I know, he has to be civil, but he is scaring me.

I pray that I am wrong.


62 posted on 11/11/2006 7:44:05 PM PST by arjay (I would rather be right than consistent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
Waxman has already said there is so many things re: Bush to investigate that his problem is which one is first...

Folks, the next two years is going to be either investigations and hearings all the time or the President is going to hand them the keys to the barn door and do pomp and circumstance for two years.

63 posted on 11/11/2006 7:44:13 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

Someone reported this week (it may have been Rasmussen) that Pelosi's approval was 24%, the same as Hastert's.


64 posted on 11/11/2006 7:44:30 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: screw boll

I'm a 31%er!


65 posted on 11/11/2006 7:44:53 PM PST by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screw boll

31%?

it's really that high?


66 posted on 11/11/2006 7:45:21 PM PST by eeevil conservative (Dems win....Republicans blame conservatives? That will help..Keep attacking your base...BRILLIANT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screw boll

Wow, with only 31% popularity rate, it seems unlikely that he'll win the next Presidential election.

Heck, I bet he won't even run.


67 posted on 11/11/2006 7:45:25 PM PST by dman4384
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dman4384
"Wow, with only 31% popularity rate, it seems unlikely that he'll win the next Presidential election."

Think Bush's unpopularity might even cost the GOP the mid-term elections? Nah!
68 posted on 11/11/2006 7:47:38 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

After this election, it is safe to disregard the Newsweek/Time/CNN/Fox polls. They wildly overestimated the Democrat margin of victory on the generic ballot.

Rasmussen/Pew/Mason-Dixon, on the other hand, cannot be ignored. They were close to being dead on in the races they covered.


69 posted on 11/11/2006 7:48:20 PM PST by Omega Man II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb

If my memory serves me correct, 1986 was the year Reagan pushed through a huge tax reform package. There was no phasing in the reform and a lot of people were hurt financially. That didn't help...also, not only was Reagan was pounded terribly by the press, but Nancy was pounded almost daily. We didn't have a FOX news back then or internet to get the real news out and it was the MSM all the time that fed people's perceptions... all that said, I loved and cheered the man.


70 posted on 11/11/2006 7:48:38 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

~LOL~ well, she certainly isn't phased by that lack of popularity, is she? Sadly less than 50% of the country even knows who she is.


71 posted on 11/11/2006 7:50:08 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

We also didn't have GOP gerrymandered districts in 1986. Quite the opposite.


72 posted on 11/11/2006 7:50:24 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden
"If Bush's numbers keep dropping, at this rate, he'll be out of office by January 2009."

LOL! Did you think you would sneak that by?

73 posted on 11/11/2006 7:50:37 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Good point.


74 posted on 11/11/2006 7:51:22 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

He is responding to 'the realities on the ground' . . . perhaps a few more people on this thread should have worked harder to re-elect a Republican majority -- in a brutal environment in Ohio (NOT related to President Bush or Iraq by the way) my grassroots team held our ground and got our Republican Congresswoman re-elected.

Again, after Reagan's losses in the 1986 mid-term, the ubercons turned on him as well -- Republicans just love eating their own. I, however, plan to battle the real ENEMY not our Commander in Chief!


75 posted on 11/11/2006 7:51:58 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

He is responding to 'the realities on the ground' . . . perhaps a few more people on this thread should have worked harder to re-elect a Republican majority -- in a brutal environment in Ohio (NOT related to President Bush or Iraq by the way) my grassroots team held our ground and got our Republican Congresswoman re-elected.

Again, after Reagan's losses in the 1986 mid-term, the ubercons turned on him as well -- Republicans just love eating their own. I, however, plan to battle the real ENEMY not our Commander in Chief!


76 posted on 11/11/2006 7:52:03 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

It was the conservative elites/intelligentsia that turned on Reagan . . . For example, William Buckley derided him as nothing more than "a speech reader in chief" because he (Buckley) felt that Reagan had 'gone soft' vis a vis the Soviet Union -- DEJA VU?!


77 posted on 11/11/2006 7:56:14 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb

Unless Republicans are willing to make the compromises necessary to allow us to win swing districts and formerly GOP-friendly areas in PA, NY, CA and New England, the GOP will be doomed to another 40 years in the wilderness.


78 posted on 11/11/2006 7:56:25 PM PST by Omega Man II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb

I'm not battling our president. I am encouraging him to fight. He owes it to the troops.


79 posted on 11/11/2006 7:57:51 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: screw boll

This will never stop. To hell with their stacked polls.


80 posted on 11/11/2006 7:59:54 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson