Replies

He, in fairness, said he was voting Republican after John Kerry's latest gaffe; he couldn't see how anyone else could vote Democrat. And his infamous "maybe we'll get real Republican leadership after we lose Congress" rant seems to be coming true. This past election will be the catalyst that will embolden House Republicans(I don't hold as much hope for the Republican't Senators) to step up and make an attempt to wrest the party from the limp-wrists in charge now. There is already talk on other radio programs, and I am sure there are rumblings in Washington. If you don't like him, fine. If you want to post this vanity in the wrong section of the website to get your frustration off your chest, that's OK, too. Just remember each of these talk hosts have their place, as entertainment and education. Take as much of both as you wish from all of them...but don't discount all of their message when you find something for which you find disagreement.

Let me explain why Savage-Weiner must be repudiated in no uncertain terms. When he turned nasty on Rush, he showed his true colors. He could have disagreed with Rush without calling him demeaning names. The one and only reason he got so nasty and personal with Rush is that he is green with envy at Rush's success as a spokesman for conservatism.

Imagine a player on your football team being so envious of the captain of the team that he tries to sabotage him. That's essentially what Weiner is trying to do with Rush. He is trying to discredit Rush so he, Weiner, can take his place as the top talk show host. And Weiner doesn't give a rat's ass that he is hurting conservatism in the process. He is a just conceited a--hole.