Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captainpaintball

Let me explain why Savage-Weiner must be repudiated in no uncertain terms. When he turned nasty on Rush, he showed his true colors. He could have disagreed with Rush without calling him demeaning names. The one and only reason he got so nasty and personal with Rush is that he is green with envy at Rush's success as a spokesman for conservatism.

Imagine a player on your football team being so envious of the captain of the team that he tries to sabotage him. That's essentially what Weiner is trying to do with Rush. He is trying to discredit Rush so he, Weiner, can take his place as the top talk show host. And Weiner doesn't give a rat's ass that he is hurting conservatism in the process. He is a just conceited a--hole.


338 posted on 11/11/2006 7:08:27 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: RussP
He could have disagreed with Rush without calling him demeaning names. The one and only reason he got so nasty and personal with Rush is that he is green with envy at Rush's success as a spokesman for conservatism.

Like I said before, this article (RE: drivel) is all about you not liking Mike's criticism of Rush so you can call Mike an a-hole a bunch of times.

Brilliant.

Maybe you can get a job as a writer for Wikipedia, or The Nation.

352 posted on 11/12/2006 5:02:43 AM PST by period end of story (You want me to hold the chicken? I want you to hold it between your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson