Skip to comments.
Global Warming Could Trigger Insect Population Boom
Live Science ^
| 11/08/06
Posted on 11/10/2006 8:14:02 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I heard England will average 80% in January 2007. I think that England is better described as 80 proof. :-)
21
posted on
11/10/2006 8:28:16 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
(Marx never could compete with the Sears catalog.)
To: edcoil
Stop talking sense! This is GLOBAL WARMING!
22
posted on
11/10/2006 8:28:19 AM PST
by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: presidio9
Does that mear Raid stocks will go up?
23
posted on
11/10/2006 8:30:25 AM PST
by
stbdside
To: presidio9
A rise in the Earths temperature could lead to an increase in the number of insects worldwide, with potentially dire consequences for humans, a new study suggests.
Whenever I see the word "could" (or it's cousin "may") in a news article, I assume that the article is not meant to inform, but to scare.
Assuming the temperature does rise, all kinds of things could happen. I suppect if there is a increase in the number of insects, there will be an equal increase on those things that eat insects.
To: Repeal The 17th
But what does more birds equal?More birdbrains?
25
posted on
11/10/2006 8:30:53 AM PST
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: presidio9
"One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves." - Kent Brockman
To: presidio9
Good news for cockroaches, uh, I mean democrats.
To: presidio9

Finally, the world will be able to feed itself. Pass the hot sauce, please.
28
posted on
11/10/2006 8:31:39 AM PST
by
OESY
To: Repeal The 17th
But what does more birds equal? Are they chickens? More fried chicken would be nice.
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
"I live in Florida. How will I know?"
LOL I was thinking the same thing! I guess those old "Attack of the ___", B-movies, were actually future documentaries.
30
posted on
11/10/2006 8:34:24 AM PST
by
moonman
(`)
To: Repeal The 17th
31
posted on
11/10/2006 8:34:32 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: presidio9
Lets add this crisis to the long list, the neverending crisis list
32
posted on
11/10/2006 8:36:28 AM PST
by
dforest
(be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
To: presidio9
Had a professor state bugs cause more waste than humans due to their numbers.
To: L98Fiero
Could, might, scientists project, possibly, etc. Lazy, pseudo-scienceThat's along the lines of what I was thinking.
Calculated, agenda-propagating spin.
34
posted on
11/10/2006 8:39:19 AM PST
by
bannie
To: edcoil
Maybe no increase in insect eaters but definitely Fatter insect eaters. I wonder if scientists will then have to monitor the cholesterol of the insect eaters. How can they keep the insect eaters healthy and trim?
35
posted on
11/10/2006 8:40:13 AM PST
by
Bitsy
To: presidio9

This will launch a whole new line of cookbooks and cartons of six-legged
(or more) chocolate delights, if not franchised chains of buggery bistros.
The environmentally-correct global swarming crowd will be ecstatic.
36
posted on
11/10/2006 8:42:06 AM PST
by
OESY
To: presidio9
Being that insects are at the very bottom of the food chain and almost all land animals feed on them or eat other animals that do, I think this is a possitive thing in the animal kingdom.
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
I live in Louisiana and I will not be able to tell the difference if the insect population increases! I've been doomed for 40 years!!!
38
posted on
11/10/2006 8:44:25 AM PST
by
Bitsy
To: Repeal The 17th
That's exactly right.
More bugs equals more birds.
But what does more birds equal?More bird poop.
39
posted on
11/10/2006 8:46:49 AM PST
by
null and void
("Jihad" just means "[My] Struggle", but then again, so does "Mein Kampf"...)
To: CIB-173RDABN
Whenever I see the word "could" (or it's cousin "may") in a news article, I assume that the article is not meant to inform, but to scare.Damm. Too long for a tagline.
40
posted on
11/10/2006 8:48:28 AM PST
by
null and void
("Jihad" just means "[My] Struggle", but then again, so does "Mein Kampf"...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson