Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Idaho professor an authority on Bigfoot
Associated Press ^ | 11/8/6

Posted on 11/10/2006 8:04:06 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: bert
Mostly, he, unlike a large number on this board does not, demand certainty. He does not depend on the narcotic of faith to direct his thoughts and actions.

Ha, ha, ha, ha! Good one there atheist! If he has the "hair" of a bigfoot/yete/abominal snowman/sasquatch he could prove it's existence with a DNA test. Did you used to go by A+ Bert? Yer killin' me!

41 posted on 11/10/2006 10:30:01 AM PST by subterfuge (Tolerance has become the greatest virtue, and hypocrisy the worst character defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Meldrum wonders aloud how much longer he will be on the Idaho State faculty.

Not to worry, there's plenty of room at one of our fine institutions here in California....Berserkeley perhaps, or maybe Santa Cruz.

42 posted on 11/10/2006 10:31:34 AM PST by AnOldCowhand (The west is dead. You may lose a sweetheart, but you will never forget her - Charles Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

....Yer killin' me!.....

Twist, twist, twist.

The needle is in him good now just a twist or two for max effect..


43 posted on 11/10/2006 10:35:39 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Rozerem commercials give me nightmares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
have called on the university to review his work with an eye toward revoking his tenure

I don't recall ever seeing the sentence with reference to Ward Churchill.

I believe that there is a better chance that there is a bigfoot, than there is that Churchill is a scholar.

44 posted on 11/10/2006 10:48:51 AM PST by razorback-bert (I met Bill Clinton once but he didn?t really talk ? he was hitting on my wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
[ Jeffrey Meldrum holds a PhD in anatomical sciences and is a tenured professor of anatomy at Idaho State University. He is also one of the world's foremost authorities on Bigfoot, also known by the native name Sasquatch, the mythical smelly ape-man of the Northwest woods. And Meldrum firmly believes the lumbering, shaggy brute exists. ]

What do Moonbats smell like?....

45 posted on 11/10/2006 11:01:39 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperboles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I always thought the Bermuda Triangle and Gods from Outer Space were more interesting fantasies.


46 posted on 11/10/2006 11:06:24 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

>>If he has the "hair" of a bigfoot/yete/abominal snowman/sasquatch he could prove it's existence with a DNA test.

I know that the field of DNA analysis is changing fast but I thought that DNA analysis on hair required the root of the hair. Even yet as many people as claim to have Bigfoot hair, you would have thought that at least one of them would have been the result of a snag and pulled out of the creature, leaving a root. If someone could produce a DNA sample of unknown primate from one of these samples, I'd be pretty convinced that a Sasquatch exists.

There was a documentary on National Geographic channel of a professor from MIT who is leading an expedition to try and discover an unknown, bipedal primate in Samatra. It has been described as a mini-sasquatch.

I'm skeptical of all these sasquatch stories but I find them somehow tantalizing. I am not compelled by some of the "pat" answers offered by the scientific establishment to discount some of the sasquatch observations. Not so put off however to become a believer.


47 posted on 11/10/2006 11:06:39 AM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

I'd also find it believable if there were SOME kind of evidence. It is much like the chubacabra in Mexico/Latin America or extraterrestials--lots of "stories", but NO evidence.

Don't know aabout the Hair Root thing regarding DNA.


48 posted on 11/10/2006 11:13:38 AM PST by subterfuge (Tolerance has become the greatest virtue, and hypocrisy the worst character defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Justa
My Wife's Grandfather was hunting out near Clallam Bay (Pysht tree farm area) in the early 70's and said he saw a Bigfoot walk in front of him as he was relieving himself behind a log. He says he ran off with his pants half-down and forgot his rifle because he was so terrified.

He was taught to hunt by a local Indian and knew the woods well. He was a large man, about 6'3" and said the creature stood over 7'. He is one of many in the Pacific Northwest who have seen the creature.

49 posted on 11/10/2006 11:15:28 AM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo (The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo

Hearing was enough for me. The few times that I did go into Gifford Pinchot national forest I always got a case of the creeps. I made sure to be out of there by dusk. The old, deserted campgrounds weren't much help either.


50 posted on 11/10/2006 12:06:30 PM PST by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Well, the wildlife folks in Kansas had been arguing for years that there were no mountain lions in Kansas. Folks who lived on farms said otherwise, reporting numerous sightings. Wildlife folks said that these people, who had lived in the country all their lives and hunted and trapped, were seeing dogs, bobcats, whatever. It went on and on.

Finally did DNA analysis on some reputed cougar scat from University of Kansas campus in October 2003. It was a cougar. Joe Collins, an "adjunct herpetologist" with the Kansas Biological Survey opined that "he didn't really think they posed any danger to adult people." Guess he didn't know about the what's for breakfast jogger cases in California and Colorado.

I'm a bigfoot agnostic, but cases like this make me inclined to try to look at all the evidence.


51 posted on 11/10/2006 12:33:49 PM PST by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: beer

52 posted on 11/10/2006 12:38:15 PM PST by evets (Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

He could tell students he is an expert on Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, U.F.O.'s, and E.S.P. and still be doing less damage to student's minds than a lot of professors.


53 posted on 11/10/2006 12:39:19 PM PST by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01

*snicker*


54 posted on 11/10/2006 1:35:03 PM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo (The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

>>I'd also find it believable if there were SOME kind of evidence.

There is some evidence but unfortunately for the Sasquatch crowd, what is there is weak and easily refuted.

For full disclosure, the late Grover Krantz, the physical anthropologist and Sasquatch enthusiast from Washington State University was an acquaintance of mine. (We shared a passion for Irish Wolfhounds.) Over the years, I spent a few hours talking Sasquatch with him. He was not troubled by my polite skepticism but he was a true believer. I still have a plaster cast of the Sasquatch footprint that Grover claims convinced him. You can clearly see dermal ridges which he claimed had minute details that only a few hundred people in the world would know. I asked him if a Sasquatch print could be faked by taking a human footprint and scaling it up. He told me no because the structure of the foot would have to change to support the great weight of a Sasquatch. The footprint in this cast had the proper anatomical measurements, again something that only a handful of people in the world would know how to fake.

Grover also showed me lots of casts that he said were clearly fakes. I had to admit that some of the fakes looked awfully convincing to me but each had something that showed him they were fake.

Fascinating conversations. Given all the crap Grover had to take from his colleagues, I'd always hoped that someone would obtain undeniable evidence of a Sasquatch before Grover passed away. But I'm still skeptical of Sasquatch.


55 posted on 11/10/2006 1:47:07 PM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Angelas; presidio9; Idisarthur; Hegemony Cricket; A knight without armor; ...
If Bigfoot doesn't exist, how can the author call him "smelly"? :)

Pretty underhanded, if you ask me.

Image hosting by Photobucket

56 posted on 11/10/2006 3:38:44 PM PST by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
One physics professor, D.P. Wells, wonders whether Meldrum plans to research Santa Claus, too...

Martin Hackworth, a senior lecturer in the physics department, called Meldrum's research a "joke."

"Do I cringe when I see the (cable television) Discovery Channel and I see Idaho State University, Jeff Meldrum? Yes, I do," Hackworth said.

"He believes he's taken up the cause of people who have been shut out by the scientific community. He's lionized there."

"He's worshipped. He walks on water."

"It's embarrassing."
AFAIC, Wells and Hackworth are embarrassments to Idaho State University.
57 posted on 11/11/2006 1:41:20 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Dhimmicrati delenda est! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Bigfoot science conference
The Scientist | September 8, 2006 | By David Secko
Posted on 09/08/2006 2:31:59 PM EDT by aculeus
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697943/posts

Smithsonian home to WSU prof's bones ... best friend's, 2
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003112749_bones08.html
Posted on 07/08/2006 1:13:17 PM EDT by Grendel9
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1662408/posts


58 posted on 11/11/2006 1:44:58 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Dhimmicrati delenda est! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium

We can assume when you write "mostly complete idiots"...we are talking about 98 percent?


59 posted on 11/11/2006 1:55:43 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

You can tell I never attended huh? I'm not so sure how many idiots, but I have met a few of them that were pretty wierd. I know they are not all bad.


60 posted on 11/11/2006 8:49:16 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson