Skip to comments.
Iraq Qaeda chief says Rumsfeld fleeing battlefield
Reuters ^
| November 10 2006
Posted on 11/10/2006 5:29:44 AM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Democratic talking points down to a T.
1
posted on
11/10/2006 5:29:45 AM PST
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
2
posted on
11/10/2006 5:31:43 AM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
(Thank you John Kerry, we never doubted your feelings towards us. Loser!)
To: jmc1969
Is al Qaeda a terrorist group? What are they doing in Iraq. I thought Iraq had nothing to do with the war on terror.
3
posted on
11/10/2006 5:32:50 AM PST
by
HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
(All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
To: jmc1969
when will the bleeding stop?
4
posted on
11/10/2006 5:34:19 AM PST
by
eeevil conservative
(Dems win....Republicans blame conservatives? That will help..Keep attacking your base...BRILLIANT!)
To: jmc1969
Democrats should respond with a rousing cry in support of Iraqi democracy and a denunciation of terrorism carried out by Islamic fascists.
5
posted on
11/10/2006 5:34:41 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(A living insult to islam since 1959)
To: jmc1969
Iraq Hopes Vote Means More Security From the link:
"The vote shows the Iraqi and American people are of one mind about withdrawing U.S. troops," said Falah Hassan Shanshal, who leads the parliamentary bloc of radical anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.
"We hope the Democrats don't forget their campaign promises. If they don't, we will deal with them in a brotherly way once the last American Soldier pulls out from Iraq," he said.
6
posted on
11/10/2006 5:35:08 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: jmc1969
Iraq Hopes Vote Means More Security From the link:
"The vote shows the Iraqi and American people are of one mind about withdrawing U.S. troops," said Falah Hassan Shanshal, who leads the parliamentary bloc of radical anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.
"We hope the Democrats don't forget their campaign promises. If they don't, we will deal with them in a brotherly way once the last American Soldier pulls out from Iraq," he said.
7
posted on
11/10/2006 5:35:35 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: jmc1969
Well that didn't take long. Have they given terms for our surrender yet?
8
posted on
11/10/2006 5:35:37 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: jmc1969
No question but this has shown Americas unwillingness to fight the tough battles. In the next 25-35 years America will be no more than the Soviet Union. This will lead to our demise and it may even be sooner. America can no longer be trusted and foreign countries now realize it.
9
posted on
11/10/2006 5:36:39 AM PST
by
gunnedah
To: jmc1969
Guess this is just another lesson of many we are soon to learn
10
posted on
11/10/2006 5:36:53 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
To: jmc1969
OBL knew America's leftwing Vietnam press was still in charge of this country.
He knew Americans would surrender.
To: jmc1969; Brilliant
Still no word from Zawahiri or Bin laden
12
posted on
11/10/2006 5:38:33 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
To: cripplecreek
Well that didn't take long. Have they given terms for our surrender yet?
&&
Don't worry about it; McGovern will be all over it this coming week.
13
posted on
11/10/2006 5:38:37 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
To: mewzilla
Just as we should have gotten Saddam the first time around, we should have gotten al-Sadr before stopping the offensive.
14
posted on
11/10/2006 5:39:33 AM PST
by
Pirate21
(The liberal media are as sheep clearing the path along which they will be led to the slaughter.)
To: nutmeg
15
posted on
11/10/2006 5:40:03 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
To: gunnedah
"No question but this has shown Americas unwillingness to fight the tough battles."This is true. Pretty much every rogue country out there know they do as they wish, and if we threaten war it doesn't matter. They now know that as a country we will turn back and run home as soon as we begin to take casualties. All they have to do is last long enough to kill a couple thousand or so soldiers. :(
16
posted on
11/10/2006 5:41:43 AM PST
by
KoRn
To: roses of sharon
17
posted on
11/10/2006 5:43:55 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
To: Mo1
Will someone ask Pelosi what her timetable is for capturing Bin Ladin?
18
posted on
11/10/2006 5:46:54 AM PST
by
50sDad
(I respect other religions by allowing them the right to worship. But they still are wrong.)
To: roses of sharon
Taking out Zarqawi was a feel good thing. But, it changed nothing on the ground in Western Iraq because we didn't put in large numbers of troops to Anbar to finally deal with al-Qaeda in Iraq.
With Zarqawi's death we also lost the number one political tool to convince the US public we are fighting terrorists in Iraq. After Zarqawi died the US public with help from the DNC and the MSM became convinced it is a civil war in Iraq and we have no reason to be there.
19
posted on
11/10/2006 5:47:35 AM PST
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
This is like the Socialist Workers International - all the Democrat comrades voicing support and brotherhood.
20
posted on
11/10/2006 5:48:29 AM PST
by
Truth29
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson