Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrat Counterrevolution
Townhall ^ | 11/09/06 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 11/10/2006 4:29:40 AM PST by Molly Pitcher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2006 4:29:41 AM PST by Molly Pitcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher

They also can't be against everything now.


2 posted on 11/10/2006 4:30:46 AM PST by bmwcyle (The snake is loose in the garden and Eve just bit the apple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
In the end, the Republican "revolution" ran out of gas and out of vision. Too many congressional Republicans appeared to care more about maintaining power than using power to implement an agenda, which they also abandoned.
It's an interesting theory, and one that many of us conservatives are clinging to, but how does it explain the election loss of Rick Santorum?

(Just asking.)

3 posted on 11/10/2006 4:33:21 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
No they'll find something to be for: the wrong agenda!

But that's to be expected. They provided little or no content during the campaign, so even the wrong agenda wlll provide some ideas for the Rs to bounce off....who must also become more content-driven.

4 posted on 11/10/2006 4:36:17 AM PST by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher

"Republicans lost a significant part of their base in this election. Exit polls revealed nearly one-third of white evangelical Christians voted for Democrats, mostly because of perceived corruption in the GOP. They will continue to exercise influence within the Republican Party, but their days of veto power over policy and candidates may be over."

Bad logic. If anything this was an exercise of 'veto power' by the "white evangelical Christians". The only way the Republicans will have "lost a significant part of their base" is if they don't pay attention to the 'veto'. The GOP didn't lose the base, they ignored it.

I read yesterday that a number of GOP candidates that lost didn't even realize they were in trouble until a week or so before the election. That's an indicator of a failure to pay attention.


5 posted on 11/10/2006 4:38:22 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Stupidity can be a self-correcting problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher

Soon, single payer health care. We are going to be taxed to death.


6 posted on 11/10/2006 4:38:45 AM PST by bmwcyle (The snake is loose in the garden and Eve just bit the apple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Santorum went in in 94 on an ant-Clinton wave. He was always to liberal for PA.I do not believe white Evangelicals voted for Dems. I believe people lie to exit pollers. Evangelicals can never vote for Dems because of one issue-abortion period. It would be a sin to vote for the party of murder.


7 posted on 11/10/2006 4:38:46 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Santorum 's earlier elections were close.

I think it was a combination of his own falling out of line with his constituants - unfortunately cause I admire him so much - and the Dems nominating a familiar name and alternative.

8 posted on 11/10/2006 4:39:06 AM PST by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
It's an interesting theory, and one that many of us conservatives are clinging to, but how does it explain the election loss of Rick Santorum?

There are "conservatives" here on Free Republic who actively sought to purge Santorum because he didn't endorse their boy in 2004. I'm hoping that when the Islamist nukes arrive here in America, those "conservatives" catch a 400-600 REM dose--so that they can die slowly and painfully in their self-righteousness.

The American people have chosen to once again dishonor their warriors and to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

9 posted on 11/10/2006 4:45:24 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (I dare call it treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
Democrats recruited more moderate and even some conservative candidates to blur their left-wing socialist image. But their party leadership is overwhelmingly liberal.

And there's the scam, these "new" democrats will vote the radical left pelosi line.

10 posted on 11/10/2006 4:48:35 AM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

The evangelical Christians got damn near everything they wanted, and then turned traitor. They stabbed the troops in the back because they didn't get every last little bit of what they demanded.

Let them ask the Democrats--the pro gay-marriage, pro-abort, Christian-hating Democrats--for political favors from now on. They have made their bed. Let them lie in it.


11 posted on 11/10/2006 4:48:50 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (I dare call it treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
The president would be wise to build relationships, at least with the conservative and more moderate Democrats, in hopes of isolating the liberals.

Nah, he's figuring out how to work with the liberals in both parties to get his shamnesty passed. So much for that.

12 posted on 11/10/2006 4:50:36 AM PST by dirtboy (John Kerry - the world's only re-usable political suicide bomber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
All talk. Pelosi and Schumer, both of whom look like they are in a permanent orgasm, are talking the same crap the demonrats were putting out in 1994. Nonpartisan, cooperation, and comity mean do it the demonrat way.
13 posted on 11/10/2006 4:51:17 AM PST by CPOSharky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Why did we lose?

My opinion, after seeing exit polls, is the "Soccer Mom", again.

Big majority of women voted Democrat. I think maybe they cant take the body count on nightly TV. I also think they truly believe the Katrina Hurricane disaster could have been avoided.

The Soccer Mom has kids getting old enough for war, and they do not like it.


14 posted on 11/10/2006 4:52:16 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
how does it explain the election loss of Rick Santorum?

Santorum is a unique case within the election. Pennsylvania is a very strong pro-life state, even within the Democrats. Santorum got that vote the last two elections. This time, the Dems nominated Casey, who is pro-life and the son of the last staunch pro-life Democrat. And Santorum could no longer count on that vote.

Throw in some stupidity of his own (such as not living in the state but having the state taxpayers foot the bill for his kids cyber-schooling), along with becoming more and more corporatist within a very blue-collar electorate, and he was doomed.

15 posted on 11/10/2006 4:53:35 AM PST by dirtboy (John Kerry - the world's only re-usable political suicide bomber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I had heard that many conservatives did not support Santorum due to Santorum's support in the primaries (2004) for Arlen Spector instead of Spector's opponent who was a conservative.


16 posted on 11/10/2006 4:53:42 AM PST by spkpls4 (Jeremiah 29:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
The Soccer Mom has kids getting old enough for war, and they do not like it.

Do they really think that the jihadis will simply go away? Do they think that their children will be any less dead if it's of radiation poisoning here in America instead of over there, fighting the enemy?

This is the best argument for the successor state to America--whatever survives the coming harvest of Islamist wrath and Ahmadinejad's madness--to deny women the franchise. They simply cannot think.

17 posted on 11/10/2006 4:55:40 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (I dare call it treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher

When I read the headline I thought December 1944, the Battle of the Bulge.

It is now time for General Georgie Patton to readjust the direction of his attack and destroy the enemy. In the snow on impassable roads in gloomy weather he pressed the attack and prevailed.

Winning is not the objective. The complete destruction of the enemy in the field is the objective.

Who is our General Patton?


18 posted on 11/10/2006 5:02:36 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Rozerem commercials give me nightmares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
There are "conservatives" here on Free Republic who actively sought to purge Santorum because he didn't endorse their boy in 2004. I'm hoping that when the Islamist nukes arrive here in America, those "conservatives" catch a 400-600 REM dose--so that they can die slowly and painfully in their self-righteousness.
That's a tad extreme, BeHoldAPaleHorse. Just a tad.
19 posted on 11/10/2006 5:04:16 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Santorum is a unique case within the election. Pennsylvania is a very strong pro-life state, even within the Democrats. Santorum got that vote the last two elections. This time, the Dems nominated Casey, who is pro-life and the son of the last staunch pro-life Democrat. And Santorum could no longer count on that vote. Throw in some stupidity of his own (such as not living in the state but having the state taxpayers foot the bill for his kids cyber-schooling), along with becoming more and more corporatist within a very blue-collar electorate, and he was doomed.
That answers my question. Thanks.
20 posted on 11/10/2006 5:05:00 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson