Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians Emerge as a Force (Losertarians deep-six the GOP)
The Economist ^ | November 8, 2006 | Unattributed

Posted on 11/08/2006 2:27:12 PM PST by quidnunc

New York – Glum Republicans might turn their attention to the Libertarian Party to vent their anger. Libertarians are a generally Republican-leaning constituency, but over the last few years, their discontent has grown plain. It isn't just the war, which some libertarians supported, but the corruption and insider dealing, and particularly the massive expansion of spending. Mr Bush's much-vaunted prescription drug benefit for seniors, they fume, has opened up another gaping hole in America's fiscal situation, while the only issue that really seemed to energise congress was passing special laws to keep a brain-damaged woman on life support.

In two of the seats where control looks likely to switch, Missouri and Montana, the Libertarian party pulled more votes than the Democratic margin of victory. Considerably more, in Montana. If the Libertarian party hadn't been on the ballot, and the three percent of voters who pulled the "Libertarian" lever had broken only moderately Republican, Mr Burns would now be in office.

Does this mean that the libertarians are becoming a force in national elections, much as Ralph Nader managed to cost Al Gore a victory in 2000? Hope springs eternal among third-party afficionadoes, but the nature of the American electoral system, which directly elects representatives in a first-past-the-post system, makes it nearly impossible for third parties to gain traction. The last time it happened was in the 1850's, when the Whig party dissolved over internal disputes about slavery, opening the way for the emerging Republican party to put Abraham Lincoln in office. And acting as a spoiler is dubiously effective at achieving one's goals. In theory, it could pull the Repubicans towards the Libertarians, but in practice, it may just elect Democrats, pushing the nation's economic policy leftwards.

(Excerpt) Read more at economist.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 3rdpartylosers; callawhaaambulance; goplosers; greenpartyrejects; lol; losertarians; rinowhino; votecp; waa; waaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 421-424 next last
To: eleni121
Euthanasia. porn, homosexual "rights" ad nauseum...

i thought you were talking smack on the Libertarians, not Republican Congressmen and Religious right Megachurch Pastors.

361 posted on 11/08/2006 10:15:19 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
>>Stan Jones, the Losertarian running in Montana didn't even know which office he was running for.

He was on the ballot as a candidate for senator (to drastically reduce state government) but his campaign Web site said he was running for governor and he said that he would pardon anyone convicted under laws he considered unjust.

And a conservative third-party candidate running on a pro-trains platform cost Allen the election in VA.<<

Disclaimer: I'm never voting Libertarian even though I have some (small L) libertarian leanings. The (big L) Libertarian party is crazy.

But... The Libertarian party did not cost the Republicans the Senate.

1. The race was so close the Republicans could have done things a little different and won. Frankly if Allen had gone after Webb on substance instead of attacking the sex in Webb's war novel we'd have a Republican senate.

2. But more fundamentally, in a healthy two party system there will always be people not happy with either party. If the Libertarian party disappeared tomorrow some other small third party would emerge.

3. This is different than when a Republican loses the nomination and deliberately plays spoiler... then we CAN blame him.
362 posted on 11/08/2006 10:19:27 PM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
f you want to try the old we'll crap in the pool and ruin it for everyone tactic please feel free...I'm sure it will remove any doubt thinking people have following yesterdays performance.

You could use a lesson in logical falacies, and from what i've seen here this late evening, there aren't too many 'thinking people' on this thread. i specifically refer to those who whine about how the Evvvvvvviiiiillllllll Libertarians sunk your party when it was in fact THE AMERICAN VOTER. Deal with it.

363 posted on 11/08/2006 10:23:25 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord

I guess you gave up your buchanan as conservative champion BS. Good, it only made you look more foolish then your comic book name.


364 posted on 11/08/2006 10:25:01 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

i always thought that Buchanan was an American born Nazi. Never had any use for the SOB, merely observing that he's a good Republican the last i checked. Looks as if it was Mission Accomplished on his part.

That he paid off some campaign debts with Reform Party money means nothing to me. Good for him. i can't stand Perot either, his only real agenda was his personal hatred for the Bush Family, especially G.H.W. Bush.


365 posted on 11/08/2006 10:29:18 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
"...merely observing that he's a good Republican the last i checked."

I really do hate to point this out to you but buchanan himself renouced the Republican party seven years ago. I guess that would explain the rest of your timely political insight and grasp of politics.

366 posted on 11/08/2006 10:31:34 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I guess you gave up your buchanan as conservative champion BS. Good, it only made you look more foolish then your comic book name.

The main thing that looks foolish this evening is the Republican Kook Aid Drinkers rationalising away the fact that they're out of touch with the American Electorate, and looking to blame everyone except themselves...do keep going though, i'm certain that you can close the gap between first and second place.

367 posted on 11/08/2006 10:35:20 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord

LOL...sure thing there Calvin the Silly...advice from someone who hasn't even got a clue of pat buchanan's affiliation.


368 posted on 11/08/2006 10:36:18 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Last i saw...just this year, he's back in the GOP. Thank you for playing though.


369 posted on 11/08/2006 10:36:48 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Pssssssssst...when he appears on the boob tube as a paid talking head the like to put the Republican label under his sour puss. It makes idiots believe he's actually a Republican trashing this nation.

Hey, I guess it does work.

370 posted on 11/08/2006 10:39:00 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
my guess is Buchanan saw the way the republican cards were falling..into a socialism of corporations rich enough to contribute..lets get real..the drug plan was a way for big pharmaceuticals to subsidize their dope without competition to bring the price down, social security reform..a scheme to flood the market with tax dollars collected without making any investor culpable, bankruptcy reform, a way to make the payment to creditors higher without bringing them any additional woes
371 posted on 11/08/2006 10:40:28 PM PST by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Can't deal with the fact that you have been thouroughly and compleatly PWNED on this thread? Not much in the way of an argument, Poindexter. See, there, we can both do name calling.

Now do you have a reply concerning the issue? If so send it later, i do have to sleep once in a while, have to work for a living to pay for Republicans spending my tax money like drunken sailors after six months at sea.

Hope the Chimp doesn't loose his veto Pen again.


372 posted on 11/08/2006 10:41:54 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: rottweiller_inc
LOL! Nope, he was just still angry over being fired by President Reagan and because conservatives weren't buying his BS. His dance under the sheets with Fulani erased any doubt most folks still had....but that's old history as well.

My, you two sure are pretty far behind. No wonder you're so confused.

373 posted on 11/08/2006 10:42:50 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Name me one liberitarian who was electable and had a chance of winning a national or state election. All you people do is suck off conservative votes and allow more rats to get elected. If Libertarians had anything going for them at all, they would run as Republicans in state elections and oust the Rinos.

You can relax, sit back, and say they screwed up, as you screw up the system.


374 posted on 11/08/2006 10:42:54 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Pssssssssst...when he appears on the boob tube as a paid talking head the like to put the Republican label under his sour puss. It makes idiots believe he's actually a Republican trashing this nation.

Psssssssssst yourself..........The Republicans don't seem to mind. Care to try again?

375 posted on 11/08/2006 10:44:34 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

no libertarians hads any hand in this train wreak..not electable and all


376 posted on 11/08/2006 10:45:34 PM PST by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord

Now I remember. Didn't I see you and the little ankle bitter at my door on Halloween? I sure did.


377 posted on 11/08/2006 10:46:08 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

for being confused an awful lot of money is being paid by the federal treasure


378 posted on 11/08/2006 10:46:49 PM PST by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: rottweiller_inc

pehaps you can elighten me about..you know all this money being spent..at least democrats keep in in the country


379 posted on 11/08/2006 10:49:33 PM PST by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: rottweiller_inc

Not in this train wreck, but they did cost us a couple of seats. Rush summed it up very well today. Republicans did not distinguish themselves from the Democrats! Btw, I posted a similiar statement laast night on the election thread....wonder if he was logged on!

To: jpsb
As I have already posted on this thread, all Republicans had to do was to be conservative. Many of them can't seem to do that. Unfortunately, Bush's border stance has effected many congressional races. His stance has not been conservative. Also many Republicans, cast off their conservative shackles and tried to get the moderate vote. Republicans have not differentiated themselves enough from democrats. Also Bush, with the bully pulpit, did not bring home the "why" of Iraq to the American public.

I know there are many around here who won't support that theory, but it remains out there, nevertheless.



4,441 posted on 11/07/2006 11:38:34 PM EST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4263 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


380 posted on 11/08/2006 10:53:14 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 421-424 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson