Posted on 11/08/2006 11:09:53 AM PST by nancyvideo
Ever wonder why questions of voter fraud are only raised when Democrats lose? When liberals prevail, not a peep is heard about intimidation, fraud or hanging chads. All but forgotten are the ten thousand lawyers standing by, ready to jump in and save our electoral system from the faulty voting machines. I guess the machines must be working after all, since they tallied in favor of the democrats. Whew, that's a relief.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightbias.com ...
You are right.
But we are dealing with, as you noted, people whose judgment of right or wrong depends solely upon whether the act accomplishes a goal. IOW, the ends justify the means.
It's what New Left Stalinists do.
It doesn't bother anyone at that university that a tenured professor in the sociology department doesn't know the difference between a "poll worker" and a "pole worker"?
Yes, but sadly, some just won't believe even the blatently obvious until it comes from Rush's mouth.
Well, think about it:
1. Voting machines are easy to tamper with.
2. Candidates are willing to spend a lot of money to win.
3. Some are willing to break the law to win.
I'd be surprised if the rats didn't rig this election. I mean, americans would have to be insane to hand over congress to the rats, considering the stakes. The terrorists are just too much of a threat for a sane person to take any chances. I hope there's a full and thouroug recount in Virginia...
Funny, to, how we got labeled the party of corruption... how soon they forget (William Jefferson anyone?)
All part of the plan. Lull them into a sense of complacency, then hack the vote in 2008. They won't see it coming.
I understand some vote machines have a button on back which allows you to vote multiple times. The 'officials' said that there is a big beep when button is activated,and this keeps it free from fraud. Right...
"It doesn't bother anyone at that university that a tenured professor in the sociology department doesn't know the difference between a "poll worker" and a "pole worker"?
Good catch. Too much. I think I'm getting my sense of humor back:)
stop talking about my sister. she works the pole at the local club and no cheating is involved.
Sound familiar?
This is an historic event. Not even Venezuelan elections could go this smoothly.
Only needing Jimmy Carter to declare them "Free and Fair".
Which I no doubt expect soon.
"I guess the machines must be working after all, since they tallied in favor of the democrats."
I just think it's easier to believe that the electorate consists of a large majority of idiots under the complete control of the MSM, than it is to believe that there was widespread voter fraud.
Chavez and Castro think the election was pretty much fair, although 128 seats over to the Ds would have been even fairer.
I'll just add this. While all of the hullabaloo was going on on TV with the Fl recount in 2000 counting ballots and hearing lawsuits, someone was comparing the voters in Miami to a list of known felons who are inelligible to vote in FL. The tally was in the paper and just kept going up until it ws 6000 by the time the Supreme Court ended everything.
Obviously voter fraud was MASSIVE in this election..
2008 will be worse... MUCH worse.. Shamnesty will make legal and illegal aliens LEGAL and not voter fraud AT ALL...
She whom should not be named will be the most powerfull socialist and corrupt leader America has ever elected in 2008..
America must be drunk, drugged and oblivious..
That, lamentably, is the least of our problems.
Bump for fraud memories.
http://www.rightbias.com/Commentary_4.aspx
"When liberals prevail, not a peep is heard about intimidation, fraud or hanging chads."
(Although I will say that in ALL elections, no matter who wins, voters should show ID because the
potential for fraud is there.)
(SATIRE):
Dems Big Night Called Into Question
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr./Rolling Stoned Magazine
The successful night the Democrats had this past Tuesday should be investigated. I have it on
high authority that DNC Chair Howard Dean was part of a vast left wing conspiracy with Diebold
and other vote counting machines to help insure a Democratic victory.
Even my own uncle's huge victory in Massachusetts was affected. Granted, he would have won
anyway, but if shenanigans by local union organizers had not taken place, he would have won by
only 35 per cent, not 40 per cent.
Diebold took bribes from major Democrats and helped to swing the election their way. "We outbid
the Republicans this time, so they had us as a client instead," said one prominent Democrat
who asked not to be named...
This was the FIRST thing I thought of when I realized it was inevitable that Republicans let the Do Nothings win. And then my 2nd realization was that Republicans NEVER cry fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.