Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: Blue wave of change
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 11/8/6 | Editor

Posted on 11/08/2006 10:14:18 AM PST by SmithL

THE MESSAGE from American voters in Tuesday's midterm elections was ... change the course.

That national mood was evident from the earliest returns. Americans were angry about the war in Iraq and the corruption and scandals that have enveloped Capitol Hill.

As a result, the Democrats regained control of the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time since 1994 and, as the counting went on late into the night, were inching within striking distance of claiming a majority in the U.S. Senate.

It was a historic night for the House and one of pride and elevated clout for San Francisco. "Speaker Nancy Pelosi" is about to become a reality. After two decades in Congress, the nation's first female speaker has all the qualities for the job -- the right blend of toughness and compassion, the knack for building and rewarding loyalties. Last night, she set the right tone by promising to bring "civility and bipartisanship" to Washington and to lead with integrity and honesty.

On Tuesday, exit polls showed the depth of public anxiety with the Republican leadership in Washington. The question is whether the Bush White House will hear the chorus of the electorate.

Vice President Dick Cheney suggested in an interview with ABC News last week that the outcome of the election would not cause the administration to change direction on Iraq.

"It may not be popular with the public," Cheney said of the war. "It doesn't matter, in the sense that we have to continue the mission and do what we think is right. And that's exactly what we're doing. We're not running for office."

Unfortunately for Bush and Cheney, many of their pro-war allies who were running for office were defeated Tuesday night.

A freshly invigorated partisan counterweight will be healthy for Washington.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 4percentunemployment; asocialistamerica; belapelosiwins; noattackafter911; recordhighsinstocks; sanfranciscovalues; tempertantrum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2006 10:14:19 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A freshly invigorated partisan counterweight will be healthy for Washington.

Anyone know what that ticking sound is?....BOOM!!!

2 posted on 11/08/2006 10:16:07 AM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

San Fran Nan healthy? The diseases she will spread are not yet catalogued by science.


3 posted on 11/08/2006 10:19:36 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They're back...rested and ready!


4 posted on 11/08/2006 10:19:47 AM PST by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Somebody ought to check Alaska. Although an R Governor was elected, wife of twice Iron Dog winner, it is getting definitely bluish up here.


5 posted on 11/08/2006 10:21:24 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Perhaps the Chronicle can explain, then, why an anti-war democrat lost to a pro-war independent in Connecticut.

I think two years of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker, raising taxes and coddling illegal immigrants will put real Conservatives back into the House.


6 posted on 11/08/2006 10:24:15 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (I wouldn't believe liberals if their tongues came notarized!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Civility and bipartisanship? It was the dems who's announced plan was to obstruct Republican action. It was dems in the Senate who filibustered judicial nominees? How is electing more democrats going to encourage their cooperation?
7 posted on 11/08/2006 10:26:01 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Correction, "RED" wave of change. There's nothing 'true blue' about the democrats, and their idiological leanings are definately "RED".

I refuse to buy into the idea that Republicans should be represented by red. And yes, it is a big deal.

Communism is not dead folks. It's alive and well and the Republican party is NOT the party of communist leanings.


8 posted on 11/08/2006 10:29:40 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

""civility and bipartisanship"
Cue spew! And projectile vomiting!


9 posted on 11/08/2006 10:33:17 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; SmithL; DoughtyOne
"Somebody ought to check Alaska. ... it is getting definitely bluish up here."


Blue ice, maybe? ...

Fire and Ice

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

-- Robert Frost

So-called global warming is a masquerade. We will all perish from a new blue state ice age.

10 posted on 11/08/2006 10:39:49 AM PST by NicknamedBob (If the Supreme Court has "Judges for Life," why is there any question about Roe vs Wade?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Yesterday's NY Times crossword puzzle had some fun with this yesterday. Certain words had clues "red state" or "blue state." The "red state" words included INSOLVENCY and COMMUNISM, while the "blue state" words included MELANCHOLY and BAWDINESS.


11 posted on 11/08/2006 10:40:23 AM PST by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Anyone know what the actual vote counts were in house races?


12 posted on 11/08/2006 10:59:11 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Who's moving to AK to cause the tide?


13 posted on 11/08/2006 10:59:52 AM PST by RockinRight (The loss is temporary, hopefully we learn from our mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Approx 1/3 the population is new each year; has been this way forever. A lot come up here because of the adventure, get a taste of it and leave with lifetime memories and tall tales. They are coming up from blue states now and bringing their blueness with them.


14 posted on 11/08/2006 11:06:15 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Not sure how the vote will break down vis-a-vis urban vs rural, but one of those stupid, old white Europeans who gave up much of his life to TRY to leave us a free and prosperous nation had a few things to say about the differences between the two, to wit:

"The mobs of the great cities add just so much to the support of pure government as sores do to the strength of the human body. It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIX, 1782. ME 2:230


I think our governments will remain virtuous for many centuries as long as they are chiefly agricultural; and this will be as long as there shall be vacant lands in any part of America. When they get piled upon one another in large cities as in Europe, they will become corrupt as in Europe." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787. Papers 12:442

"I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health and the liberties of man. True, they nourish some of the elegant arts; but the useful ones can thrive elsewhere; and less perfection in the others, with more health, virtue and freedom, would be my choice." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, 1800. ME 10:173

"Our cities... exhibit specimens of London only; our country is a different nation." --Thomas Jefferson to Andre de Daschkoff, 1809. ME 12:304

"Everyone, by his property or by his satisfactory situation, is interested in the support of law and order. And such men may safely and advantageously reserve to themselves a wholesome control over their public affairs and a degree of freedom which, in the hands of the canaille of the cities of Europe, would be instantly perverted to the demolition and destruction of everything public and private." --Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1813. ME 13:401

"An insurrection... of science, talents, and courage, against rank and birth... has failed in its first effort, because the mobs of the cities, the instrument used for its accomplishment, debased by ignorance, poverty, and vice, could not be restrained to rational action. But the world will recover from the panic of this first catastrophe." --Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1813. ME 13:402

"I fear nothing for our liberty from the assaults of force; but I have seen and felt much, and fear more from English books, English prejudices, English manners, and the apes, the dupes, and designs among our professional crafts. When I look around me for security against these seductions, I find it in the wide spread of our agricultural citizens, in their unsophisticated minds, their independence and their power, if called on, to crush the Humists of our cities, and to maintain the principles which severed us from England." --Thomas Jefferson to Horatio G. Spafford, 1814. ME 14:120

Whatever the break-down, America as they and many of us older citizens knew it is largely over.


15 posted on 11/08/2006 11:11:23 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Whatever the break-down, America as they and many of us older citizens knew it is largely over.

Life moves on and the American experiment continues.

16 posted on 11/08/2006 11:24:54 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"Stabbing the troops in the back is good for America."


17 posted on 11/08/2006 11:26:07 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

They are. I saw them on tour this year.

On a more serious note, the Blue/Red key to election maps only recently changed. I still see them as Red Commies.


18 posted on 11/08/2006 11:29:13 AM PST by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Civility and bipartisanship? It was the dems who's announced plan was to obstruct Republican action. It was dems in the Senate who filibustered judicial nominees?

Something that evidently has been forgotten around here and, needless to say, by the MSM.

To see Pelosi, et al., standing up and saying it's time for bipartisanship is an amazing site; one wonder why she was struck dead by lightning on the spot.

19 posted on 11/08/2006 11:31:27 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Thanks for the submission. Good one...


20 posted on 11/08/2006 11:45:29 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson