Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn on the results...
Steynonline ^ | 7th november | Mark Steyn

Posted on 11/07/2006 7:44:37 PM PST by Spacewalker

Right now, this isn't a Dem landslide but a conventional Year Six election with an underperforming opposition party. 1938 Senate races: GOP picked up six seats. 1958 Senate election: Dems picked up 13 seats. 1986 Senate election: Dems picked up nine (net). In other words, by historical standards this is an excellent result for the President's party six years in. Needless to say, that's not a perspective the Dems, the media, the Europeans or the insurgents will have any time for....


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: elections; results
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: potlatch


That sounds like the 2 main food groups!



101 posted on 11/07/2006 9:24:11 PM PST by devolve ( __you_get_schmuck_in_massachussetts__)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Spacewalker

Spin it how you want but the end result is that Nancy Pelosi is the Speaker of the House and the Dems are running important committees in the midst of the war on terror. And the consequences for the border issue are tremendous. This has been a bad night.


102 posted on 11/07/2006 9:26:11 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

"xcept, what the hell was going on in the world in 1938, 1958, and 1986. NOTHING! Here we are in the beginning of a long, brutal, and bitter war and the nation throws it towards the Dems."

A joke?

1938 had Hitler
1958 was the midst of the cold war
1986 was the least perilous of the three but the cold war was still going on.


103 posted on 11/07/2006 9:27:09 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

"er our southern border and ultimately the enemy is the same.Pass an amnesty bill and we will have 40 million more illegal Latinos in a decade or less."

Bingo. Once amnesty happens we can never go back.


104 posted on 11/07/2006 9:29:38 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: newconhere
Pennsylvania is a bright blue state. That's why Santorum lost.
105 posted on 11/07/2006 9:29:43 PM PST by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Bears repeating:

The Dems startegy this time: non-stop Bush and Iraq bash with the help of the media; mudsling on every GOP candidate about sex, lies, corruption; run "conservative" and military candidates in red-state areas; say nothing in regard to plans and solutions, just muddy the water and play on the voters fear and frustration.

This daily drumbeat was not countered!

106 posted on 11/07/2006 9:31:30 PM PST by razorback-bert (I met Bill Clinton once but he didn?t really talk ? he was hitting on my wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Well, I could post a third choice but threads are too serious tonight for fooling around!!


107 posted on 11/07/2006 9:33:21 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
The point is, we are in the middle of effing war and the vast majority of the people in the United States cannot see the danger.

Most people in the Oval Office cannot see the danger either. If they had, Sadr City would have been levelled two years ago and Muqtada al-Sadr would be hanging in the gallows beside Saddam come January.

108 posted on 11/08/2006 12:42:23 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; 7thson
1958--Height of the Cold War.

And Eisenhower sent 14,000 troops into Lebanon that year:

President Eisenhower responded by authorizing Operation Blue Bat on July 15, 1958. The goal of the operation was to bolster the pro-Western Lebanese government of President Camille Chamoun against internal opposition and threats from Syria and the United Arab Republic. The plan was to occupy and secure the Beirut International Airport, a few miles south of the city, then to secure the port of Beirut and approaches to the city. The operation involved approximately 14,000 men, including 8,509 Army personnel, including a contingent from the 24th Airborne Brigade of the 24th Infantry Division (Germany) and 5,670 officers and men of the Marine Corps. The presence of the troops successfully quelled the opposition and the U.S. withdrew its forces on October 25, 1958.
And he sent the US Navy into the Taiwan Straights to support Taiwan and even threatened Nuclear War on Chinese cities to get the point across.

In 1958 the Chinese Communist Party launched the Great Leap Forward ....

From 23 August through October of 1958, the Communist government resumed a massive artillery bombardment of Quemoy and Matsu, and threatened invasion. Chinese patrol boats blockaded Quemoy and Matsu against Chinese Nationalist resupply efforts This was accompanied by an aggressive propaganda assault on the United States, threats against American naval ships, and a declaration of intent to "liberate" Taiwan. Quemoy, which lies about 10 kilometres from the mainland, had been used by the Nationalists to mount raids on mainland China.

Once the shelling began, the United States made it clear that it would support the ROC in the defense of the islands. Responding to public commitments by the US to defend Quemoy and Matsu, the Eisenhower Administration deployed forces to the region. The American response included a large naval contingent in the Taiwan Straits. The defenders of the islands were supplied by ships escorted by US naval vessels. Senior American officials, including President Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, publicly affirmed the US commitment to defend Taiwan and to counter naval threats in the Taiwan Straits. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles declared that the U.S. would take "timely and effective action to defend Taiwan".

American naval aircraft also helped the Nationalist air force establish control of the region’s airspace. Nationalist pilots flying American-made fighters defeated their Communist opponents in a series of air battles that cast doubt on the quality of Communist’s pilots and aircraft. As tension mounted between the United States and China, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff developed plans for nuclear strikes at the Chinese cities of Shanghai, Guangzhou and Nanjing. These plans were consistent with the public statements of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, who on 12 January 1954 had threatened "massive retaliation" against Communist aggression and expressed willingness to go "to the brink" of war to stop such aggression. The Joint Chiefs of Staff war plans for defense of the islands moved automatically into nuclear strikes on Shanghai and Canton, among other mainland China targets, resulting in millions of non-combatant casualties. ...

Despite Soviet support of the People's Republic of China's claims to the islands, the bombardment abated, then virtually ceased after President Eisenhower warned that the United States would not retreat "in the face of armed aggression."


109 posted on 11/08/2006 12:56:59 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
1986 was the least perilous of the three but the cold war was still going on.

In 1986 President Reagan bombed Libya and finished the deployment of hundreds of nuclear-tipped Pershing II IRBMs in Germany and England.

110 posted on 11/08/2006 1:08:50 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

But compared to 58 and 38 it wasn't quite as threatening a time.


111 posted on 11/08/2006 4:18:56 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: speedy
The Rats are never more than a tax increase away from being voted back out. They will make convenient whipping boys for the 2008 elections.

I'm ready for this. If my 401(k) loses a dime or the price of gas goes up a nickle...it's the Dimms' fault! Not to mention another attack on American soil.

112 posted on 11/08/2006 4:21:09 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GenXFreedomFighter
Of course, it'll be all Bush's fault ...

Not any more.

113 posted on 11/08/2006 4:22:04 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: newconhere

the Santorum thing is actually pretty simple. Dem voters do not look at things such as capabilities or performance
they simply look to see the "D" or "R" after a name. And with Pittsburgh and Philly solidly in control of Dem machines there just aren't enough votes left in the rest of the state to matter.


114 posted on 11/08/2006 4:37:09 AM PST by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Then who is running things? Are the generals on the ground over there running the show? Have they been too whipped by the PC police? I remember in the 90's, especially after Tailhook, how so many officers were forced to resign because of some "inappropriate" remark. I thought at the time that these were the Pattons, Ike's, MacArthur's, Lee's, Nimitz's, Halsey's, etc, that were being kicked out and when the next big one came around the pike, we would be in trouble. Well, are we in trouble? Was there not one officer of command quality in Iraq that recommended Sadr City had to go? And if there was, why was he not listened to?

It is the morning and I am still pissed off. We spend so much time arguing over details. Yeah, I know events were happening in those years. But the main point I am trying to express is was there a sense of foreboding and danger as there is today. I cannot speak for 38 because I wasn't there. Nor can I speak for 58 because I was a baby. But for the events happening in 86, I was around then. I was in the Navy. There was no sense of danger in the air.

We got boots on the ground fighting people who have said it in speeches and in writings that they want to destroy the U.S. and return to an 7th century Islamic state. I mention this to people and all I get is a blank stare. I mention The Looming Tower and I get the blank stare. I mention The Path To 9/11 and I get the blank stare. I mention Obsession and they look at me as if I am a nut. Maybe I am. Maybe I am too involved in this crap. Maybe I need a vacation.

I have been knocking an idea around in my head since before the election. The idea came from writing letters to my local paper in support of candidates and not having them printed. I get frustrated because not only my voice but I think the voices of thousands of people are not being heard. I want to start some sort of local newsletter in my county that discusses conservative Republicanism. I would want to discuss -

The definition of conservatism - it's not just about money.

The origins of the Republican Party - it's not just big business and low taxes.

Defend the miltary as a worthy and honorable institution.

Spotlight someone in the military - either a medal winner from Iraq, a local servicemember away from home, or talk about a military hero.

Discuss county issues and how they effect the citizens.

Discuss Maryland issues and how they effect the citizens.

Discuss national issues and how they effect the citizens.

Spotlight a conservative Repbublican.

And the main thing I want to do is concentrate on young people - starting from age 15 on up - and explain to them what conservatism means.

I apologize and I am sorry for my rant of last night. We all are working for the same goal. I am sorry I was such an arsehole last night.

115 posted on 11/08/2006 8:17:20 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Spacewalker; Perdogg
He's right...it's historical...let's enjoy the holiday season and start the good fight in 2007.
116 posted on 11/08/2006 8:19:49 AM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Leading up to our entry into WW II, we had one of the worst militarys in the world. The Germans and the Japanese had better militarys and better equipment. One thing we did have was a group of officers that for 20 years believed in America and trained continuously for the WW II. We had citizens who believed in America, from Hollywood on down, and volunteered to fight against these people.

I believe what some other posters have said. We need to either revamp the Republican Party or start a new one that reflects American values. We may need to spend 20, 30, 40 years in the wilderness but I think we could do this.

I apologize and I am sorry for my rant of last night. We all are working for the same goal. I am sorry I was such an arsehole last night.

117 posted on 11/08/2006 8:23:05 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru
I like your tagline. I am the same.

I apologize and I am sorry for my rant of last night. We all are working for the same goal. I am sorry I was such an arsehole last night.

118 posted on 11/08/2006 8:24:27 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Don't forget McDermott, folks. Don't forget McDermott. Of all of them, he's the most wrapped around the axle against America.


119 posted on 11/08/2006 8:26:47 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The terrorists are delighted with tonight's results.

I would put up a "Terrorists Thank You For Voting Democratic!" sign
in my front yard...
But that would probably get my house burned down here in this
"tolerant" university town.
120 posted on 11/08/2006 8:28:48 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson