>>yellowstone - strong rep 92,000 reg voters 0 of 69 reporting
I wonder why CNN have it marked as white rather than red on their electoral map? Weird.
Because, the results have been pulled altogether from the SOS's website in Montana.
Something's up there, I guess. A miscount? I'm not sure. It's been a good while, now, though. We should be getting some news soon.
Burns won Yellowstone in 2000, but only 51-47. He's running behind his 2000 totals statewide, so it could well be a wash...
Not weird at all. "CNN" was the operative word.