Skip to comments.
FedEx cancels order for 10 Airbus A380s
AP newswire ^
| 7 Nov 2006
| AP
Posted on 11/07/2006 8:50:00 AM PST by Rokke
MEMPHIS, Tenn. - FedEx Corp. said Tuesday it has canceled its order for 10 Airbus A380 jets, the new jumbo double-decker plane that has been dogged by numerous delays.
The company's FedEx Express unit has ordered 15 Boeing Co. 777 Freighters, and has options to purchase an additional 15, FedEx said in a news release. The company cited Airbus' production delays as the reason for the decision.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airbus; boeing; mayday; sacrebleu; usausausa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: Rokke
There is always the 747-8F freighter.
To: Red Badger; dcam
Airbust: "Boeing, Boeing.... GONE!"
To: Patton@Bastogne
"I believe (not positive) that Honeywell Commercial Aerospace acquired Fed-Ex a couple of years back. "
Definitely not. FedEx could buy Honeywell as a financial snack.
43
posted on
11/07/2006 9:15:56 AM PST
by
Rokke
To: Gay State Conservative
Nah. That honor is falling on the TnNG. They are bringing in some flying monstrosity and the airport is undergoing a refit and expansion. FDX is just too happy to "assist" with it financially.
44
posted on
11/07/2006 9:16:43 AM PST
by
Maigrey
(A vain thin-skinned condescending blueblood with no sense of his ridiculousness - M Steyn on JCarry)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Was that the one where they were having problems retracting the landing gear? I loved their solution, put a slick Teflon like coating where the parts were rubbing and when that didn't work, I think they covered it with grease. Even then it didn't work too smoothly. LOL!
45
posted on
11/07/2006 9:17:00 AM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: DungeonMaster
The real problem.
The plane came in several tons overweight than what was contractually promised.
46
posted on
11/07/2006 9:17:04 AM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
"There is always the 747-8F freighter."
FedEx is convinced that the 747 is not economical for the type of cargo (all containerized) we carry. But I sure wish we'd buy them too.
47
posted on
11/07/2006 9:17:59 AM PST
by
Rokke
To: Pukin Dog
Yup.. this plane is over weight, and were in the world are they going to get rid of more weight ? not fly PAX on it ?
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Let's hope the Dem/Libs/MSM go the way of the A-380.
To: Rokke
H***, my company sends out product by the ton with you guys every night. I'd be worried sending the product we send out on a french flying can.
50
posted on
11/07/2006 9:22:29 AM PST
by
Maigrey
(A vain thin-skinned condescending blueblood with no sense of his ridiculousness - M Steyn on JCarry)
To: armymarinemom
Nope. And Memphis isn't the only airport redoing runways, taxiways and ramps
Oh man. Leave it to the french ( KERRY ) to hurt others while they shoot themselves in the foot.
To: sausageseller
OOOOOOPPPPPSSSSS.
52
posted on
11/07/2006 9:23:22 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: Rokke
Built it and they aren't coming.
53
posted on
11/07/2006 9:23:44 AM PST
by
razorback-bert
(I met Bill Clinton once but he didn’t really talk — he was hitting on my wife)
To: Rokke
Just yesterday a FReeper was saying that should two major buyers of the A380 cancel their pre-orders, the entire program will be canceled.Suddenly, with this article, that statement makes sense....I think this is "Major buyer number 1".
To: Psycho_Bunny
That Freeper was Pukin Dog. Despite being a Navy guy, he's also occasionally correct.
55
posted on
11/07/2006 9:26:51 AM PST
by
Rokke
To: Rokke
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall an article in the Indianapolis Star indicating that FedEx was already upgrading their facilities at the Indianapolis airport to handle the 380. (I think at least one of the runways could already handle the 380 without needing an upgrade).
But I've been wrong before...
56
posted on
11/07/2006 9:26:56 AM PST
by
ChromeDome
(Every person's death diminishes me. Some more than others.)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
They would have to use more lightweight materials in the interior, such as composite materials for all the seat frames, etc...
but that raises the price of the plane greatly and the customers are going to demand Airbust pay for these, not them.
57
posted on
11/07/2006 9:28:02 AM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Psycho_Bunny
I expect Emirates to cancel some of their A-380 orders and by some 747-8Is
To: Plutarch
To: ChromeDome
"But I've been wrong before..."
Not this time. You are correct. Same at Anchorage. Like I said, they've already spent millions of dollars preparing for the 380. And Fred Smith does NOT like to waste money. That's why this decision is such a big indicator of major problems with the 380. I suspect it is toast.
60
posted on
11/07/2006 9:29:35 AM PST
by
Rokke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson