Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Admin Moderator
2 posted on
11/07/2006 3:34:05 AM PST by
don-o
(Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
To: Admin Moderator
Alex, I'd like to buy a "NOT", please....
To: Admin Moderator
Shouldn't that be DON'T POST EXIT POLLS? ;)
5 posted on
11/07/2006 3:34:43 AM PST by
small voice in the wilderness
(The dems. can't have a fool-proof plan. There would be no one left in their base.)
To: Admin Moderator
Shouldn't that be "Do NOT post..." etc.
GOTV!
Good luck!
6 posted on
11/07/2006 3:34:45 AM PST by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: Admin Moderator
Everyone - get out and vote or we'll get more of this:
In our brave new schools, Johnny can't say the pledge, but he can recite the Quran. Yup, the same court that found the phrase "under God" unconstitutional now endorses Islamic catechism in public school.
A Clinton appointed judge ruled in California's 9th Circuit Court that it's okay for kids to be forced to recite aloud Muslim prayers that begin with "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful . . . ."
Memorizing the Muslim profession of faith: "Allah is the only true God and Muhammad is his messenger."
Chanting "Praise be to Allah" in response to teacher prompts.
Professing as "true" the Muslim belief that "The Holy Quran is God's word."
Giving up candy and TV to demonstrate Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of fasting.
Designing prayer rugs, taking an Arabic name and essentially "becoming a Muslim" for two full weeks.
Parents of seventh-graders, who after 9-11 were taught the pro-Islamic lessons as part of California's world history curriculum, sued under the First Amendment ban on religious establishment. They argued, reasonably, that the government was promoting Islam.
But a federal judge appointed by President Clinton told them in so many words to get over it, that the state was merely teaching kids about another "culture."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25311
8 posted on
11/07/2006 3:34:55 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Admin Moderator
Bully, Bully!
We learned in 2004 that Exit Polls are manipulative BS.
There is no way the early exit polling could have been true, given the eventual result. The fix was in then, it will be in today.
Go vote. They can print that headline, and EAT IT!
11 posted on
11/07/2006 3:35:41 AM PST by
gridlock
(The GOP will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: Admin Moderator
12 posted on
11/07/2006 3:36:10 AM PST by
dakine
To: All
The exit polls will most likely be skewed RAT, due to heavy GOP early/absentee voting.
Get out there and vote! If tens of of thousands of DEAD Democrats can come out and vote, then you certainly have no excuse. VOTE!!!
To: Admin Moderator
But President Kerry says he REALLY enjoys the exit polls...
BTW everyone, GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!!
18 posted on
11/07/2006 3:38:03 AM PST by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Admin Moderator
Exit polls will be prone to be even stupider then usual, since so many Republicans have voted early.
19 posted on
11/07/2006 3:38:05 AM PST by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: Admin Moderator
20 posted on
11/07/2006 3:38:42 AM PST by
KoRn
To: Admin Moderator
Here are exit poll results. GOP wins, Pelosi despondent, Rove you magnificent Bastard!
To: Admin Moderator
absolutely....
remember Florida in 2000, the central time zone area thought the state was already in Algore's bag. Lots of folks did not vote. And the GOP generally owns the panhandle.
I agree heartily.....NO EXIT POLLS!
25 posted on
11/07/2006 3:40:12 AM PST by
Vaquero
To: Admin Moderator
Can we post TradeSports prices?
26 posted on
11/07/2006 3:40:53 AM PST by
Momaw Nadon
("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
To: Admin Moderator
I am the Dwead Piwate Wove, all your worst nightmares are about to become twuuuu
29 posted on
11/07/2006 3:41:49 AM PST by
nativist
To: Admin Moderator
I plan on voting at 5pm today.
32 posted on
11/07/2006 3:44:52 AM PST by
NapkinUser
(Why isn't there a 'virtual fence' around the White House?)
To: Admin Moderator
While I have been critical and sometimes perplexed at many of the "Mods" decisions in the past, this one is right on the money.
Why not take a page out of the Dhimis' Playbook: "Vote Early and Vote Often." LOL
To: Admin Moderator
Ugh, you mods spoil all the fun ;o)
MM
40 posted on
11/07/2006 3:48:41 AM PST by
motormouth
(Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.)
To: Admin Moderator
What do you have against exit poles???
41 posted on
11/07/2006 3:48:41 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Admin Moderator
At 6:05 AM in Upstate NY, there were 3 Votes, and the voters exited.
fortunately, no one tripped over the "exit pole"
42 posted on
11/07/2006 3:48:45 AM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson