Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Sabato: Election Eve 2006 (THE FINAL PREDICTIONS)
Larry J. Sabato and the University of Virginia Center for Politics ^ | 11-6-06 | Larry Sabato

Posted on 11/06/2006 8:48:16 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative

November 6, 2006

Election Eve 2006: THE FINAL PREDICTIONS

Larry J. Sabato and David Wasserman
U.Va. Center for Politics

NOTE: Races we consider "Late Breakers"--those in which we have changed our outlook or prediction since Thursday--are denoted by arrows identifying the direction of momentum. Red arrows () indicate momentum for the Republican candidate, while blue arrows () signify momentum for the Democratic candidate.

Dear loyal readers,

What a wild ride it's been! As the midterm madness of 2006 draws to a close, the Crystal Ball is reminded just how quickly the facts of our politics can change.

Just last year, we and many others wrote in awe of the 21st Century structural obstacles Democrats faced in putting a sizeable number of GOP-held seats in play. We even speculated that "an entrenched lack of competition may be all the anti-itch medication the GOP needs" to preserve congressional majorities. These days, of course, everyone is singing a much different tune.

This year's "sixth year itch" election has had its share of rollercoaster-worthy twists and turns, and overall, Republican fortunes have followed a gradually downward trajectory. Competition has expanded rapidly, even into the eleventh hour. For us, it's this volatility that has made the 2006 midterm cycle both fun to watch and difficult to gauge.

With one day to go, the situation is still very fluid. This weekend, we had a potentially pro-GOP event, the sentencing of Saddam Hussein, and a potentially pro-Democratic event, the unveiling of Rev. Ted Haggard's family values hypocrisy. The Crystal Ball's initial guess was that both news headlines, while attention-grabbing, would have only a marginal impact on the vote (and it's also worth noting that a record percentage of voters will have voted early this year, softening any impact of the last-minute headlines).

Yet something is happening. Both the Washington Post/ABC News poll and the new Pew survey show a dramatic tightening of the generic ballot vote, with Democrats leading by 4 to 6 percent. If these polls are accurate, this is bad news for Democrats, and they suggest that Democratic gains might be more limited than have been widely expected. Perhaps the Republican vote is finally coming home--much later than usual. President Bush's campaigning in red territory and the GOP's smart get-out-the-vote operation may be working at last. We will know tomorrow night.

For many a political practitioner, Election Eve is when pure nerves take over. Most of the hard work has already been done, and nearly every vote decided. Surely many Democrats will go to sleep tonight sensing the same giddy anticipation felt on Christmas Eve, with dreams of congressional majorities dancing in their heads and electoral goodies stuffed in stockings. Surely many in the GOP will go to bed dreaming that Democrats' gifts will be few and far between tomorrow--and that the "gifts" are mainly coal and switches!

Although we're not out to determine who's been naughty or nice (believe us, that's a subject for many other Crystal Ball emails--and both parties have their fair share of people on both lists), we did make a list of predictions on Thursday, and we promised we would check it twice. The result of our re-checking is a last-minute batch of ratings changes, and even several changes of our predictions.

So thanks for staying with us this election year--now fasten your seat belts and hang on for the ride as the Crystal Ball calls 'em all!

Our best Election Day wishes to all of you,

The Crystal Ball Team

THE SENATE: +6 Dems = 51D, 49R

Despite hard-fought campaigning in every battleground state up until the very end, the overall Senate picture has not changed much since our Thursday assessment. The Crystal Ball still sees 4, 5 or 6 seats going to the Democrats, resting party control of the Senate squarely on the edge of the butter knife.

The Democrats must win all the close ones and capture all the toss-ups to gain control, which is very tough to do. The safe bet is that Democrats will gain no more than five seats, and thus the GOP will remain in charge by a fingernail of the upper chamber of Congress. But what the heck? We'll live dangerously. We think the Democrats may replicate their feat from 1986 (the sixth year election of Ronald Reagan's Presidency) and capture just enough seats to take over. This is our least confident prediction. We believe the Democrats have excellent chances to win the House and take a majority of the Governorships, while a thin Senate majority has odds no better than 50.1 percent to 49.9 percent.

Contests remain extremely close in the "Threshold Three"--Missouri, Tennessee, Virginia--with close races still possible in Maryland, Montana, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, where Democrats hold narrow leads. Our outlooks have not changed, save to tilt Tennessee towards the Republicans. When we add together all our predictions, Democrats pick up six seats, sufficient to wrest control from the GOP. Here our our final picks:

Final Senate Predictions

Republican Held Seats up for Election in 2006: 15 (out of 55 held)

Solid R (7) Likely R (0) Leans R (2) R Toss-up (0) D Toss-up (2) Leans D (2) Likely D (1) Solid D (1)

IN (Lugar) AZ (Kyl) VA (Allen) MT (Burns) OH (DeWine) PA (Santorum)

ME (Snowe) TN (OPEN) MO (Talent) RI (Chafee)

MS (Lott)

NV (Ensign)

TX (Hutchison)

UT (Hatch)

WY (Thomas)

WV (Byrd)

WI (Kohl)

NY (Clinton)

NM (Bingaman)

ND (Conrad)

MA (Kennedy)

HI (Akaka)

FL (Nelson)

WA (Cantwell) DE (Carper)

NE (Nelson) CT (Lieberman*)

MN (OPEN) VT (OPEN)

NJ (Menendez) MD (OPEN) MI (Stabenow) CA (Feinstein)

Solid R (0) Likely R (0) Leans R (0) R Toss-up (0) D Toss-up (1) Leans D (1) Likely D (4) Solid D (12)

Democratic Held Seats up for Election: 18 (out of 45 held)

The Brutal B - November 6, 2006: +4 to +6 D

Click here for individual Senate race analysis.

THE HOUSE: +29 Dems = 232D, 203R

We admit: the Crystal Ball approaches the task of predicting the range of Democratic gains in the House with some anxiety. Politically, the House has always been the more volatile chamber of Congress this year; it has been the locus of far more scandal, and as always, there are more than ten times as many seats up for grabs in the House than there are in the Senate. In a "wave" election year, House races often surprise even the most astute observers by sneaking up into competition under the radar screen close to Election Day.

Even since we last published on Thursday, our list of late breaking races has grown much longer, and most of the shifts we have seen have favored the party out of power. Many of these contests emerged as horse races too late for the major parties to compete dollar-for-dollar in the districts at stake, and many are in such deeply red territory that they might not be good long-term investments for Democrats anyway. The Democratic thinking goes: "if we're headed for a majority, why play in states like Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, or Wyoming only to lose the seats in a less favorable political environment two years later?" Still, we'll bet outcomes in one or two of these places will surprise us. For Democrats, will these "late breakers" prove heartbreakers or supermajority-makers? It's anyone's guess, and we'll only know after the polls close.

The Crystal Ball believes that Democrats will likely win more than enough races to take control (+25 to 33), and could see even larger gains if a large wave crashes even deeply red territory. By the same token, Democrats may end up leaving several of their 2nd or 3rd tier candidates stranded on 2nd or 3rd base with 47 or 48 percent of the vote on Election Night. We are betting that the toss-ups split evenly between the parties, 18 apiece. When we add up all of our predictions, Democrats gain 29 seats in the House to command the same size majority the GOP currently holds, 232-203. Here are our final picks, with our "late breakers" first:

Final House Predictions: The 20 Late Breakers

Republican Held Seats in Play: 70 (162 Safe/Solid R)

Likely R (10) Leans R (13) R Toss-up (18) D Toss-up (17) Leans D (9) Likely D (3)
CO-06 (Tancredo) CA-04 (Doolittle) AZ-01 (Renzi) AZ-05 (Hayworth) FL-13 (OPEN) AZ-08 (OPEN)
FL-08 (Keller) CA-50 (Bilbray) KS-02 (Ryun) CA-11 (Pombo) IN-02 (Chocola) CO-07 (OPEN)
FL-09 (OPEN) CO-05 (OPEN) KY-03 (Northup) CO-04 (Musgrave) IA-01 (OPEN) IN-08 (Hostettler)
IN-03 (Souder) IL-10 (Kirk) MN-01 (Gutknecht) CT-02 (Simmons) NY-24 (OPEN)
MI-07 (OPEN) IA-02 (Leach) MN-06 (OPEN) CT-04 (Shays) NC-11 (Taylor)
MN-02 (Kline) KY-02 (Lewis) NE-03 (OPEN) CT-05 (Johnson) OH-18 (OPEN)
NH-01 (Bradley) NV-02 (OPEN) NV-03 (Porter) FL-16 (OPEN) PA-06 (Gerlach)
NY-03 (King) NJ-07 (Ferguson) NY-19 (Kelly) FL-22 (Shaw) PA-07 (Weldon)
OH-12 (Tiberi) NY-29 (Kuhl) NY-25 (Walsh) ID-01 (OPEN) PA-10 (Sherwood)
WV-02 (Capito) NC-08 (Hayes) NY-26 (Reynolds) IL-06 (OPEN)
VA-10 (Wolf) OH-01 (Chabot) IN-09 (Sodrel)
TX-23 (Bonilla) OH-02 (Schmidt) KY-04 (Davis)
WA-05 (McMorris) PA-04 (Hart) NH-02 (Bass)
PA-08 (Fitzpatrick) NM-01 (Wilson)
VA-02 (Drake) NY-20 (Sweeney)

WA-08 (Reichert) OH-15 (Pryce)
WI-08 (OPEN) TX-22 (OPEN)

WY-AL (Cubin)

WV-01 (Mollohan)
VT-AL (OPEN)
TX-17 (Edwards)
IA-03 (Boswell) OH-06 (OPEN)
IL-08 (Bean) LA-03 (Melancon)
GA-12 (Barrow) GA-08 (Marshall) IN-07 (Carson)
Likely R (0) Leans R (0) R Toss-up (0) D Toss-up (1) Leans D (3) Likely D (6)

Democratic Held Seats in Play: 10 (193 Safe/Solid D)

The Brutal B - November 6, 2006: +25 to +33 D

Click here for individual House race analysis.

THE GOVERNORSHIPS: +7 Dems = 29D, 21R

The Crystal Ball continues that Democrats will easily claim a majority of the statehouses after the votes are counted, moving from 22 today to 28-30. Although we could be surprised elsewhere, the gubernatorial race that we are most torn about is Minnesota's, where we are calling it for the Democrat simply because of the state's strong Democratic tide.

Note that the endangered Democratic incumbent governors may all win--not because they are strong, but because the GOP is so weak this year (think Michigan, Oregon, Maine, Wisconsin, and Illinois). Also keep in mind that even strong GOP governors may lose simply because of the R next to their name (think Maryland and Minnesota). Here are our final picks:

Final Governor Predictions

Republican Held Seats up for Election in 2006: 22 (out of 28 held)

Solid R (6) Likely R (4) Leans R (4) R Toss-up (2) D Toss-up (0) Leans D (1) Likely D (4) Solid D (1)

CT (Rell) AL (Riley) AK (OPEN) MN (Pawlenty) MD (Ehrlich) AR (OPEN) NY (OPEN)

HI (Lingle) CA (Schwarzenegger) FL (OPEN) ID (OPEN) CO (OPEN)

NE (Heineman) GA (Perdue) NV (OPEN) MA (OPEN)

SD (Rounds) SC (Sanford) RI (Carcieri) OH (OPEN)

VT (Douglas)

TX (Perry)

WY (Freudenthal)

TN (Bredesen)

WI (Doyle) PA (Rendell)

MI (Granholm) OK (Henry)

ME (Baldacci) NM (Richardson)

IA (OPEN) NH (Lynch)

OR (Kulongoski) IL (Blagojevich) KS (Sebelius) AZ (Napolitano)

Solid R (0) Likely R (0) Leans R (0) R Toss-up (0) D Toss-up (1) Leans D (5) Likely D (1) Solid D (7)

Democratic Held Seats up for Election: 14 (out of 22 held)

The Brutal B - November 6, 2006: +6 to +8 D

Click here for individual Governor race analysis.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004moonbatpoll; 2006moonbatpoll; bbcprediction; moonbat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Andrewksu

Ping for archiving


21 posted on 11/06/2006 9:05:05 AM PST by centurion316 (Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida WorldwideA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

If Lieberman wins = then, as far as Iraq goes - he will be as good as a republican -


22 posted on 11/06/2006 9:07:20 AM PST by maine-iac7 ( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Who can shed some light on this question? How do the pollsters adjust for the fact that Republican likely voters are more likely to actually vote than Democrat likely voters?

Zogby uses his "special sauce" but what do the others use?


23 posted on 11/06/2006 9:07:31 AM PST by cpdiii (Oil Field Trash and proud of it, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative; Corin Stormhands
Considering that Sabato has been one of the leading forces pushing the whole "Macacagate" fiasco? Considering that Mr. Macaca himself was a student in one of Sabato's UVa classes? Considering that Sabato was instrumental in getting out the "Allen was a racist at UVa in the '70s stories"--stories whose primary source was a known long-time Democratic activist in North Carolina, a fact that Sabato didn't mention?

Larry Sabato could tell me the friggin' sky was blue and I wouldn't believe him till I could look out a window. He's a liberal, always has been, always will be, and he's got a personal vendetta against George Allen.

}:-)4

24 posted on 11/06/2006 9:08:02 AM PST by Moose4 (They caught me white and nerdy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“I hope that someday your children and grandchildren will tell of the time that a certain president came to town at the end of a long journey and asked their parents and grandparents to join him in setting America on the course to the new millennium—and that a century of peace, prosperity, opportunity, and hope followed. So, if I could ask you just one last time: Tomorrow, when mountains greet the dawn, would you go out there and win one for the Gipper?” —Ronald Reagan, November 7, 1988


25 posted on 11/06/2006 9:10:05 AM PST by Jeffrey_D.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4; GraniteStateConservative; Coop

If Allen pulls this off, and today I'm much more optimistic, Larry Sabotage will be more depressed than Webb.

I've never had much respect for him. But he blew any pretense of non-partisanship and credibility with that whole "I ~know~ he said it" crap.


26 posted on 11/06/2006 9:16:54 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (Who the hell cares about the truth about Jim Webb? After all, George Allen said "macaca.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee
This guy is smoking crack, there is no way all three Republican incumbents (House) will lose. I predict they will retain 2 of the 3 seats.

Call me ridiculously optimistic or just plain crazy - but I think CT will retain all three Republican incumbents. I'm pretty secure Simmons and Johnson will win... isn't the Shays/Farrell race within the margin of error?

Unfortunately I can't help any of them, since we're now stuck with the RAT Larson. A few years ago our congresscritter was Nancy Johnson... Of course she's a huge RINO, but I'll take her over John Larson any day...

27 posted on 11/06/2006 9:19:03 AM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

One needs an "adult diaper" to hold that much crap.


28 posted on 11/06/2006 9:19:09 AM PST by Petronski (Why won't Diebold talk about RYMB.DLL?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee

BTW, FWIW... I'm pretty sure Larry Sabato is a 'RAT himself... wishful thinking on his part perhaps?


29 posted on 11/06/2006 9:20:12 AM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii; #1CTYankee; GraniteStateConservative; BlackElk
Who can shed some light on this question? How do the pollsters adjust for the fact that Republican likely voters are more likely to actually vote than Democrat likely voters?

Plus the fact that so many Republicans don't partake in polls because they simply won't answer their phones (at least those of us with Caller ID).

30 posted on 11/06/2006 9:22:08 AM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

I don't buy this - it's leaning towards the D's even more than the Dems own optimistic predictions.


31 posted on 11/06/2006 9:23:28 AM PST by RockinRight (Maintaining a Republican majority is MORE IMPORTANT than your temper tantrum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

placemarker for later "neer - neer - neering"


32 posted on 11/06/2006 9:25:36 AM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Menendez is poised to reap the benefits of Democrats' organizational advantages in places like Essex, Hudson, Camden, and Union counties, even if his ethnic last name costs him some votes in other regions of the state.

What a pig Sabato is, implying that Republicans won't vote for Menedez because he's got a hispanic last name.

We won't vote for him because he's proven himself to be a blatently corrupt scumsucking toadie of Bob Torricelli.

Sabato can shove that "ethic last name" line up his ass. Jackass.

33 posted on 11/06/2006 9:26:13 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

Let me see if I understand Sabato here.

Bob Corker, running against a black candidate considered conservative for a Democrat, will be helped by a marriage amendment referendum that will turn out black voters.

Huh?


34 posted on 11/06/2006 9:27:42 AM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
"I'm pretty sure Larry Sabato is a 'RAT himself... wishful thinking on his part perhaps?"

His numbers in the house look too high, wishful thinking? I'd say so.

35 posted on 11/06/2006 9:28:29 AM PST by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Larry Sabotage: Another liberal macaca, deeply saddened on Wednesday.


36 posted on 11/06/2006 9:34:42 AM PST by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

....he said that George Allen said the N word....

**
He did? When?


37 posted on 11/06/2006 9:36:13 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

I would love for Sabato to read the posts on this thread. Who does he think he is fooling?


38 posted on 11/06/2006 9:36:29 AM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
In order to maintain control of the Senate, we need to win only one of the 6 races Sabato shows us losing to the Dems. Allen, Burns, and Steele all seem like possible wins. I say all three pull it out to leave us at -3 in the Senate.

In the House, I think we take the following races that Sabato has going to the RATs:

Az(05)
Ca (11)
Co(04)
Ga (12)
Mn (06)
Ct (02)
Ct (05)
Fl (16)
Fl (22)
Il (06)
In (02)
In (09)
Ky (04)
Oh (15)
Nm (01)
Id (01)

I see us with -13 in the House to hold control by one vote. It could go either way, but I don't think either party has control by more than 5 seats.

39 posted on 11/06/2006 9:39:04 AM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
my fear is too many idiots are going to buy into the: "if you don't vote for the crooked leftist from memphis,you are a racist load of crap
40 posted on 11/06/2006 9:40:12 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson