1 posted on
11/06/2006 8:20:49 AM PST by
snowrip
To: snowrip
2 posted on
11/06/2006 8:22:19 AM PST by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
To: snowrip
There should be no discussion that a person should have to prove that they have the right to vote. When people who are not eligible to vote vote anyway, it infringes upon my voting rights.
3 posted on
11/06/2006 8:25:21 AM PST by
JamesP81
(Rights must be enforced; rights that you're not allowed to enforce are rights that you don't have.)
To: snowrip
A Democrat big wig said they have 7000 lawyers ready to go with the paperwork already drawn up!!!
4 posted on
11/06/2006 8:25:37 AM PST by
Suzy Quzy
To: snowrip
Yep it could be a problem for any Repub candidate who wins a very close race. Dim candidate refuses to concede, and out comes rent-a-mob chanting "Count all the votes!" And keep counting until their guy wins. Magically find a box stuffed full of uncounted ballots. Etc, etc.
5 posted on
11/06/2006 8:41:15 AM PST by
FlyVet
To: snowrip
It's not how many lawyers you have on your side that matters, it's how many judges...
6 posted on
11/06/2006 8:46:13 AM PST by
apillar
To: snowrip
I'm sorry, but this has gotten out of hand. I wonder when the Clinton Gang first hatched this approach to winning elections? Even lefties in other countries are now taking this approach when they lose an election. Reading this has caused me to amend my tagline. When reading things like this, I remember why I must vote for the GOP - not happily, though. How depressing.
7 posted on
11/06/2006 8:51:03 AM PST by
Major Matt Mason
(Both parties suck, but the Democrats are pure evil.)
To: snowrip
Al Gore opened this particular seal on a pit full of demons. Thanks a bloody lot, Al.
Regards, Ivan
11 posted on
11/06/2006 9:25:00 AM PST by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson