Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyering Up: Election By Litigation
RedState ^ | 11/6/06 | California Yankee

Posted on 11/06/2006 8:20:48 AM PST by snowrip

Lawyering Up Election By Litigation

The New York Times reports hundreds of the 7,000 lawyers working on the election for the Democratic National Committee are being sent to Arizona, Florida, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio and 13 other states. The left-leaning Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the N.A.A.C.P., and the People for the American Way Foundation are despatching 2,000 lawyers to 20 states.

To hold off that juggernaut, 150 lawyers will be sent by the Republican National Committee to help hundreds of local lawyers in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Tennessee and other states.

Read on.

About 800 Justice Department lawyers will be in troubled polling locations in 20 states to referee and ensure voting rights laws are obeyed.

The Republican lawyers are outnumbered at the state level as well:

* In Maryland, the Democratic Party has 400 roving attorneys. * In Michigan, the Democratic Party, is dispatching 800 lawyers statewide. * In St. Louis, Missouri, the Democrats are trying to obtain credentials for 300 lawyers to work as poll challengers.

What is it that these legions of lawyers are supposed to do? The same thing we saw in 2000 and 2004. The Republicans want to deter vote fraud by guarding against ineligible people trying to vote. The Democrats, of course, take the opposite position fighting voter suppression by trying to allow everyone who shows to vote, regardless of qualifications.

It all comes down to two sides of the same coin. One lawyer's fight against fraudulent voting is another lawyer's fight against voter suppression.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/06/2006 8:20:49 AM PST by snowrip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snowrip

Echoes of Florida 2000.


2 posted on 11/06/2006 8:22:19 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

There should be no discussion that a person should have to prove that they have the right to vote. When people who are not eligible to vote vote anyway, it infringes upon my voting rights.


3 posted on 11/06/2006 8:25:21 AM PST by JamesP81 (Rights must be enforced; rights that you're not allowed to enforce are rights that you don't have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

A Democrat big wig said they have 7000 lawyers ready to go with the paperwork already drawn up!!!


4 posted on 11/06/2006 8:25:37 AM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Yep it could be a problem for any Repub candidate who wins a very close race. Dim candidate refuses to concede, and out comes rent-a-mob chanting "Count all the votes!" And keep counting until their guy wins. Magically find a box stuffed full of uncounted ballots. Etc, etc.
5 posted on 11/06/2006 8:41:15 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

It's not how many lawyers you have on your side that matters, it's how many judges...


6 posted on 11/06/2006 8:46:13 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
I'm sorry, but this has gotten out of hand. I wonder when the Clinton Gang first hatched this approach to winning elections? Even lefties in other countries are now taking this approach when they lose an election. Reading this has caused me to amend my tagline. When reading things like this, I remember why I must vote for the GOP - not happily, though. How depressing.
7 posted on 11/06/2006 8:51:03 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (Both parties suck, but the Democrats are pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

He's lying.


8 posted on 11/06/2006 9:01:53 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet; All

It has come to the point where the dimocrats actually RELY on massive voter fraud.

I joined FR on election night 2000, when conservative Florida became suddenly too close to call.


9 posted on 11/06/2006 9:07:44 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1L

How many lawyers DO they have ready to go then??


10 posted on 11/06/2006 9:24:14 AM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Al Gore opened this particular seal on a pit full of demons. Thanks a bloody lot, Al.

Regards, Ivan

11 posted on 11/06/2006 9:25:00 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Probably no more than a thousand across the country. About 15 of which are worthy of attention.

The good lawyers aren't going to waste their time showing up somewhere to watch. They are also going to demand they get paid, and there isn't that much money to pay them what they will charge.

Don't think that there are thousands of pro-bono attorneys in force. There may be a bunch (many or most of whom are law school grads perhaps with a bar card, but no real legal skills), but none of them are worth a damn. I've seen the so-called attorneys that show up for RAT causes.


12 posted on 11/06/2006 10:07:47 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson