To: blogblogginaway
My only concern is were those cross checked with registration rolls and were the rolls purged of ineligibles prior to the election?
2 posted on
11/06/2006 7:59:21 AM PST by
doodad
To: blogblogginaway
To: blogblogginaway
...so the Rats can see how many more votes they need in key districts...........This SMELLS BIGTIME!...........
5 posted on
11/06/2006 8:18:41 AM PST by
Red Badger
(ECCLESIASTES 10 The heart of the wise inclines to the RIGHT, but the heart of the fool to the LEFT.)
To: blogblogginaway
So the RATS will know how many votes they have to create sooner in the recount process???
7 posted on
11/06/2006 8:24:09 AM PST by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: blogblogginaway
with all the so called voter machine problems they had in past elections I would think that state would be going strictly by the book. I am assuming this is to make sure they get all the black votes.
9 posted on
11/06/2006 8:29:53 AM PST by
jetson
To: blogblogginaway
On Saturday, the secretary of state's office said counties must secure access to scanning locations, ensure that two bipartisan overseers control absentee ballots and that totals not be disclosed until the polls close on Tuesday."Yeah, bipartisan. I am, trust me. That's the ticket. "
13 posted on
11/06/2006 9:56:42 AM PST by
FlyVet
To: blogblogginaway
results of these early scans will only be "leaked" if it shows democrats ahead...
14 posted on
11/06/2006 10:35:25 AM PST by
dubie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson