Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: calcowgirl
Hmm ... Sounds like Dems are already coming up with far-fetched before-the-fact excuses as to why they're going to lose.
To: calcowgirl
Oakland basedSounds like a setup for voter fraud complaints
3 posted on
11/04/2006 2:23:49 PM PST by
PatrickF4
To: calcowgirl
What in the world would a company selling voting machines be thinking, to put an external switch on the machine that could affect the totals. Beeper or not, this is outrageous.
4 posted on
11/04/2006 2:26:12 PM PST by
Vermonter
To: calcowgirl
"You can't do it surreptitiously," said Guy Ashley, spokesman for the Alameda County Registrar of Voters. "You have to know what you're doing.
Okay, so here's how you do it...
5 posted on
11/04/2006 2:26:36 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: calcowgirl; MikefromOhio
It's a featureNot something we really want to hear on a voting machine.....
6 posted on
11/04/2006 2:26:44 PM PST by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: calcowgirl
How many times are dead people allowed to vote? Who is Chavez favoring in the election?
To: calcowgirl
Louisiana has been using electronic voting machines for decades now. If I'm not mistaken, that button is what the attendant presses to enable the next person in line to vote after one person already has. In order for a voter to screw around with that, he would have to literally walk all the way around the machine, right next to where the attendant is, then walk back into the booth and vote again. Unless Helen Keller is working the booth, it's impossible not to get caught.
Hooray, we're ahead of the curve on something!
To: calcowgirl
On our electionic voting machines you receive a plastic data card that serves as a single ballot. I've never seen a variation on this for an electronic machine. One ballot, one vote. What are they doing in CA?
13 posted on
11/04/2006 2:37:03 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: calcowgirl
Question: why do we spend hundreds of millions on voting machines that are used one or two days a year?
16 posted on
11/04/2006 2:51:29 PM PST by
BW2221
To: calcowgirl
Electronic voting should NEVER be permitted.
17 posted on
11/04/2006 2:52:39 PM PST by
Jim Noble
(If we can't leave a democracy behind, we should at least leave the corpses of our enemies.)
To: calcowgirl
"If the machine beeps loudly and someone has their arms wrapped around the machine, the poll workers are going to become suspicious,"What if the poll workers are the ones pushing the button?
22 posted on
11/04/2006 3:16:11 PM PST by
expatpat
To: calcowgirl
I'm not worried about fraud during the actual polling time. I'm worried more about fraud before and after. If I'm the organized Party of Vote Fraud, I rig the voting before or after, not during the voting.
23 posted on
11/04/2006 3:16:49 PM PST by
Tall_Texan
("Journalislam" - reporting about murderous extremists as if they are moral equivalents.)
To: calcowgirl
Perhaps a moderator could update the subject line to indicate this machine is made by the HUGO CHAVEZ owned company??
To: calcowgirl
In Florida, it looked at early voting that it would be easy to pocket the voter card. Nobody was attending the table where the cards are turned in. It was self service.
30 posted on
11/04/2006 3:46:52 PM PST by
floriduh voter
(www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
To: nnn0jeh
31 posted on
11/04/2006 3:47:52 PM PST by
kalee
To: calcowgirl
WTF? Who designs these things? School kids?
33 posted on
11/04/2006 4:04:19 PM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: calcowgirl
I've said it before and I'll say it again, you can only get away with this kind of stuff if you're a poll worker or in cahoots with a poll worker.
At the end of the day (*), the poll workers have to reconcile the number of votes the machine says it registered with the number of signatures in the roster, plus absentee ballots handed in, etc. If those don't match, somebody down at election HQ will get involved and have to either resolve it or throw them out or something.
It's impossible that the machine will show 1000 votes and the precinct roster will have 500 signatures and that precinct's 1000 votes will be accepted.
(*) One of the few times this phrase is appropriate to a discussion, if I may say so myself.
34 posted on
11/04/2006 4:08:09 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: calcowgirl
A piece of cardboard, some duct tape and problem is solved on election day.
36 posted on
11/04/2006 4:39:35 PM PST by
Doctor Raoul
(Difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic is that the Free Clinic knows how to stop a leak.)
To: calcowgirl
Remember who demanded such machines post-2000, DEMOCRATS!
37 posted on
11/04/2006 4:40:48 PM PST by
Doctor Raoul
(Difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic is that the Free Clinic knows how to stop a leak.)
To: calcowgirl
I have only one question: Does this help or hurt Republicans?
38 posted on
11/04/2006 4:43:56 PM PST by
streetpreacher
(What if you're wrong?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson